| Author |
Message |
Forum: Cycling Topic: A video of loads of cyclists riding on the pavement! |
| weepej |
|
Posted: Sat Nov 19, 2016 16:18
|
|
Replies: 20
Views: 23920
|
| Try telling this poor lady that cyclists aren't dangerous. http://www.shropshirestar.com/news/emergency-services/2016/11/10/woman-pedestrian-suffers-serious-head-injuries-in-telford-cycle-collision/ We can all pick individual cases graball. And you when you say "that cyclists aren't dangerous&... |
|
 |
Forum: Cycling Topic: A video of loads of cyclists riding on the pavement! |
| weepej |
|
Posted: Fri Nov 11, 2016 13:30
|
|
Replies: 20
Views: 23920
|
You rather have your body have to deal with 40,500 joules of kinetic energy (1000kg car at 20mph) than 3,700 (92kg of person and bike at 20mph)?
Really? |
|
|
Forum: Cycling Topic: A video of loads of cyclists riding on the pavement! |
| weepej |
|
Posted: Thu Nov 10, 2016 21:33
|
|
Replies: 20
Views: 23920
|
| Your example makes no sense as 50 people would be clearly visible to both cyclist and driver and they would both stop or would not be on the pavement in the first place, well not the driver at least unless it is a deliberate act of aggression. It is far more likely that both would hit a single or s... |
|
|
Forum: Cycling Topic: A video of loads of cyclists riding on the pavement! |
| weepej |
|
Posted: Thu Nov 10, 2016 09:50
|
|
Replies: 20
Views: 23920
|
| On the subject of physics, the bike's weight is not that relevant if a 80Kg rider is on it and hits you at 20mph, what is more important is all of the pointy bits. Being hit at 20mph by a cyclist may be more dangerous than by a car as the car has been built with rounded surfaces designed to minimis... |
|
|
Forum: Cycling Topic: A video of loads of cyclists riding on the pavement! |
| weepej |
|
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2016 21:01
|
|
Replies: 20
Views: 23920
|
Neither are drivers.
Which is worse in your eyes though, cycling along a pavement, or driving along it? |
|
|
Forum: Cycling Topic: A video of loads of cyclists riding on the pavement! |
| weepej |
|
Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2016 10:46
|
|
Replies: 20
Views: 23920
|
My point is can you not see the difference between somebody in a large vehicle with limited visibility driving along a pavement and somebody on a 28lb bike?
We're talking physics here. |
|
|
Forum: Cycling Topic: A video of loads of cyclists riding on the pavement! |
| weepej |
|
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2016 20:12
|
|
Replies: 20
Views: 23920
|
| I don't condone cyclists doing it in the main, although I'm not going to get too angry at say a mum riding carefully on the pavement with her child. Can't you see the difference between somebody on a bike doing it and somebody in a car doing it though? If you can't, no wonder you find me so confusing! |
|
|
Forum: Cycling Topic: A video of loads of cyclists riding on the pavement! |
| weepej |
|
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2016 19:15
|
|
Replies: 20
Views: 23920
|
It's an important point, not trolling!
People do all sorts of stupid things, not car drivers, not cyclists, people... |
|
|
Forum: Cycling Topic: Bike pile-up on a London cycle super-highway |
| weepej |
|
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2016 16:04
|
|
Replies: 5
Views: 10030
|
PeterE wrote: weepej wrote: There are idiot's on bikes and idiots in cars. Don't you get this? Wow, you still around?  Many cyclists don't seem to accept the former. Stray apostrophe, btw 
Many cyclists? How many have you asked? |
|
|
Forum: Cycling Topic: A video of loads of cyclists riding on the pavement! |
| weepej |
|
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2016 16:02
|
|
Replies: 20
Views: 23920
|
|
|
Forum: Cycling Topic: Lorries face London ban 'to protect cyclists' |
| weepej |
|
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2016 16:01
|
|
Replies: 6
Views: 16370
|
malcolmw wrote: weepej wrote: malcolmw wrote: I still can't think of another activity promoted by the Government which is known to increase the danger to its population. Driving? You think driving is "promoted" by the Government? Quite the reverse.
Are you kidding? |
|
|
Forum: Cycling Topic: Lorries face London ban 'to protect cyclists' |
| weepej |
|
Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2016 22:50
|
|
Replies: 6
Views: 16370
|
malcolmw wrote: I still can't think of another activity promoted by the Government which is known to increase the danger to its population.
Driving? |
|
|
Forum: Cycling Topic: Bike pile-up on a London cycle super-highway |
| weepej |
|
Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2016 22:45
|
|
Replies: 5
Views: 10030
|
| They want motorists to give them five feet of space when overtaking, but happily ignore it themselves! Spot the difference. 28lb bike and rider going past with a speed differential of 5mph or so, one tonne vehicle going past at 20mph +.. And not all cyclists behave the same as this idiot! There are... |
|
|
Forum: Cycling Topic: The cyclist is in the wrong |
| weepej |
|
Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2016 07:34
|
|
Replies: 2
Views: 10129
|
| Grist to the mill that having video recording equipment on you can turn you into a complete arsehole! The lady probably should've waited behind the cyclist, but still it was a fair pass and she didn't cut him up. The cyclist is being roundly condemned on the Facebook page, which is full of cyclists ... |
|
|
Forum: Speed, Safety, Driving and The Law Topic: Busy road turned into a head-on death trap after council ... |
| weepej |
|
Posted: Wed Feb 17, 2016 08:38
|
|
Replies: 10
Views: 16343
|
Article wrote: Transport for London (TfL) suggested there has been a "statistically significant reduction in vehicle speeds" as a result of removing the central markings.
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-35480736 |
|
|
Forum: Speed, Safety, Driving and The Law Topic: Busy road turned into a head-on death trap after council ... |
| weepej |
|
Posted: Wed Feb 17, 2016 08:37
|
|
Replies: 10
Views: 16343
|
jomukuk wrote: Few cyclists use the lane anyway, they use the pavement.
No wonder, with people like you ignoring the cycle lane markings! |
|
|
Forum: Cycling Topic: Number of cyclists in court for ignoring road signs doubles. |
| weepej |
|
Posted: Sat Jan 30, 2016 17:27
|
|
Replies: 13
Views: 19421
|
botach wrote: I could go back over lots of Weepy's posts and drag up the evidence.
No you couldn't.
botach wrote: I'd prefer not to -as I'm for road safety BY ALL ROAD USERS,
Me too, that's a given, but which sign being ignored causes more societal harm?
 or the one with the bike in a red circle? |
|
|
Forum: Speed, Safety, Driving and The Law Topic: Busy road turned into a head-on death trap after council ... |
| weepej |
|
Posted: Fri Jan 15, 2016 16:09
|
|
Replies: 10
Views: 16343
|
| This neigh defies belief! They have a legal obligation to provide proper marking on the road. Even to do this as an experiment seems that it ought to be illegal as it's totally unpredictable, unexpected (no warning signs of road or marking changes, no warning of no central line), and whilst it does... |
|
|
Forum: Cycling Topic: Number of cyclists in court for ignoring road signs doubles. |
| weepej |
|
Posted: Fri Jan 15, 2016 15:57
|
|
Replies: 13
Views: 19421
|
| So what if there was a voluntary registration for cyclists? A chip you can allocate to a bike and let's just say for sake of argument that the existing cameras could pick it up and ID it? Would you then register ? You'd need all sorts of legislation and laws passed to get this through and allow it ... |
|
|
Forum: Cycling Topic: Number of cyclists in court for ignoring road signs doubles. |
| weepej |
|
Posted: Fri Jan 15, 2016 15:53
|
|
Replies: 13
Views: 19421
|
Botach, you're making stuff up again.
botach wrote: Cyclist mows pedestrian down- pedestrian got in path of cyclist.
Where did I say this?
botach wrote: Cyclist runs into back of parked black cab- cab is guilty.
Where did I say this? |
|
|
| Sort by: |
Login
Register
FAQ
Search
Members