Hi Mike,
Yes, I'm very aware of these issues. I have looked at content management systems (CMS) and there are both advantages and disadvantages. One massive disadvantage is breaking thousands of links around the web to specific Safe Speed pages. Another is that it would become much harder to find a page by rememering its title - something that I do a few dozen times each day - and frequently to guide others on the phone.
The present structure has grown miles beyond the intentions of the original design, and I agree there are some problems. It isn't as bad for me as you guess, because I do have a subdirectory structure at this end. I like to keep the URLs short and logical for easy quoting, so dumping everything into the root of the web site itself is highly deliberate.
I'm more concerned about helping visitors to find the content they are looking for, and I have here about 4 different menu and index structures all of which have advantages and disadvantages. The next structural alteration will probably be the addittion of a user-optional frames based index.
A long term background project is a thing I call the "guide". It's a 3,000 word page with a description of the entire content with links to every other page. For those who want to try and read the web site like a book, this will provide the logical structure required to know how far you have dug into it, and also provides the chance to read everything. The guide is nearly ready.
Thanks for the comments and suggestions.
btw, I moved this message because I always intended this forum section for this sort of discussion. "Opinions" is supposed to be for folk to tell us how wonderful our approach to road safety is.
I get loads of these by email, but few are intended for posting in public. I'd better do something better because part of the hearts and minds battle involves not having extreme or minority views. It's far too easy for the "antis" to dismiss safe Speed as fringe or mionority views.