Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Sun Nov 09, 2025 22:26

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 41 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 11:10 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 00:24
Posts: 2400
Location: Kendal, Cumbria
SafeSpeed wrote:
malcolmw wrote:
We should not dilute (or corrupt) the message here by mixing in global warming.


Graeme wrote:
I think you (as SafeSpeed) should stay out of the "denial of global warming" arena.


Benj wrote:
I think challenging the validity of human contribution to global warming is a bit far out for SafeSpeed. I myself am extremely skeptical but associating the campaign with what is still looked upon by the vast majority of the media as a bit of a "luncatic fringe" viewpoint might damage your reputation with them.


OK OK! You're all correct, and I know it. :thumbsup:

I agree too...




...but I still can't help but think that we need to do something about this. The whole thing just has "load of bollocks" written all over it, and seems to have so many parallels with the great speed camera swindle that it seems like a huge missed opportunity not to link the two.

As for "looking after the future" I'd hate to think that by letting all this nonsense go on now I was thereby resigning my children to 40 years of crippling taxation, lost opportunity, and living in a regime bordering on "green totalitarianism".

_________________
CSCP Latin for beginners...
Ticketo ergo sum : I scam therefore I am!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 11:15 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 22:02
Posts: 3266
Any way I believe the Daily Mail... If I drive down to the corner shops I will get eaten by a polar bear :shock:

Therefore I must pay gordon brown an extra £4000 a year?
These polar bears are running a realty nasty protection racket.....

_________________
Speed limit sign radio interview. TV Snap Unhappy
“It has never been the rule in this country – I hope it never will be - that suspected criminal offences must automatically be the subject of prosecution” He added that there should be a prosecution: “wherever it appears that the offence or the circumstances of its commission is or are of such a character that a prosecution in respect thereof is required in the public interest”
This approach has been endorsed by Attorney General ever since 1951. CPS Code


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 11:34 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 14:26
Posts: 4364
Location: Hampshire/Wiltshire Border
JT wrote:
...but I still can't help but think that we need to do something about this. The whole thing just has "load of bollocks" written all over it, and seems to have so many parallels with the great speed camera swindle that it seems like a huge missed opportunity not to link the two.


So, in a democracy, what you do is vote out the party which has ideas opposed to yours. Who would you vote for out of the 3 major parties then?

The reason democracy is failing us and people are not voting at elections is that there is no choice. All the conviction politicians of yesteryear are gone and we just have centre ground poseurs who will say anything to get a vote.

You have no chance to start a new party with any meaningful chance of success. Just look at UKIP. They have the best supported single issue campaign with grassroots voters and cannot get anywhere.

What do we do? Emigrate.

_________________
Malcolm W.
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not represent the views of Safespeed.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 12:04 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 00:04
Posts: 2311
anton wrote:
Any way I believe the Daily Mail... If I drive down to the corner shops I will get eaten by a polar bear :shock:


unbelievable, isn't it?

Quote:
However frightening the men’s ordeal may have been, the animal’s hunger illustrates how global warming is beginning to make life harder for polar bears.

Is anyone crazy enough to think that polar bears have only recently thought of eating just about anything that moves?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 12:11 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 00:24
Posts: 2400
Location: Kendal, Cumbria
malcolmw wrote:
JT wrote:
...but I still can't help but think that we need to do something about this. The whole thing just has "load of bollocks" written all over it, and seems to have so many parallels with the great speed camera swindle that it seems like a huge missed opportunity not to link the two.


So, in a democracy, what you do is vote out the party which has ideas opposed to yours. Who would you vote for out of the 3 major parties then?

None of them, as they are all singing from the same songsheet.

It strikes me that after all these years of brainwashing about "Global Warming" all the major parties now realise that the majority of voters now believe in it, ergo it would be political suicide for any of them to go against that way of thinking, regardless of what the truth might actually be.
Quote:
What do we do? Emigrate.

Ten years ago I'd have said "Never!", as I'm very patriotic and truly love my country, but there does reach a point where you start to wonder...

_________________
CSCP Latin for beginners...
Ticketo ergo sum : I scam therefore I am!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 12:22 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2006 13:01
Posts: 472
I guess you have to decide whether campaigning to alter the perception of the public (and authorities) about road safety sits comfortably with entering the debate on global warming.

If you do the latter it could be construed that the former is not the true aim of the organisation.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 12:29 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
B cyclist wrote:
I guess you have to decide whether campaigning to alter the perception of the public (and authorities) about road safety sits comfortably with entering the debate on global warming.

If you do the latter it could be construed that the former is not the true aim of the organisation.


Quite right. We're not going to be getting involved.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 12:30 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 22:02
Posts: 3266
Ten minuite rule bill:
Ban international air travel without a permit, rebuild butlins, the cornish riviara, blackpool, bognor, the Isle of White. Plant the set aside land with trees or wind farms. Stop the wars, Re-call all enviromentalists to the UK. Train our own nurses and doctors, plumbers brickies and electricians.
After lunch we can organise duel weekly rubbish and recycling collection and cars bikes and busses can share the same road to save tarmac and aliminium signs. And we can move road tax to petrol.

_________________
Speed limit sign radio interview. TV Snap Unhappy
“It has never been the rule in this country – I hope it never will be - that suspected criminal offences must automatically be the subject of prosecution” He added that there should be a prosecution: “wherever it appears that the offence or the circumstances of its commission is or are of such a character that a prosecution in respect thereof is required in the public interest”
This approach has been endorsed by Attorney General ever since 1951. CPS Code


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 12:36 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
I watched the Stern report launch conference on TV. And I realised -

It's a bloody religion. Believe and 'we will save you'. Fail to pay your tithes and you will send your children to hell. Do not argue - to argue is heresy.

And anyway - hasn't all religion been based on man attempting to communicate with the weather?

God is dead. Long live glodal warming. :(

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 16:35 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 18:38
Posts: 396
Location: Glasgow
I heard a radio programme at the weekend on offsetting carbon emissions when you buy a landrover. You buy what appeared to be some trees in Scotland, from a company, when you buy your car and this will supposedly offset for 3 years your carbon. On investigation, the trees were already planted so you wern't paying for new planting just a guarantee that some trees will not be chopped down. Even then the landowners said they had no intention of cutting the trees down anyway. Sounded like one big con, with the middle company getting the profits.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 16:41 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2006 11:59
Posts: 32
Location: Lowestoft, Suffolk
I think it fair to say that the ABD website has a lot of info about global warming and the hysteria that has been whipped up.
There's only one solution- turn the sun off :evil:

_________________
I walk I cycle I drive and I vote


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 17:23 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 22:02
Posts: 3266
SafeSpeed wrote:
And anyway - hasn't all religion been based on man attempting to communicate with the weather? :(


This is where we can blame cameras

We have been praying to our gods that we didn't miss a mobile/specs/gatso
We have stopped praying to god for the right weather....
And look at the result :lol:

_________________
Speed limit sign radio interview. TV Snap Unhappy
“It has never been the rule in this country – I hope it never will be - that suspected criminal offences must automatically be the subject of prosecution” He added that there should be a prosecution: “wherever it appears that the offence or the circumstances of its commission is or are of such a character that a prosecution in respect thereof is required in the public interest”
This approach has been endorsed by Attorney General ever since 1951. CPS Code


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 18:13 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
anton wrote:
SafeSpeed wrote:
And anyway - hasn't all religion been based on man attempting to communicate with the weather? :(


This is where we can blame cameras

We have been praying to our gods that we didn't miss a mobile/specs/gatso
We have stopped praying to god for the right weather....
And look at the result :lol:


:hehe:

But seriously the 'religion' parallels are absolutely everywhere. I find it really quite disturbing. The more you look, the more obvious it gets. Almost all the news coverage fits the pattern.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 18:53 
Offline
New User
New User

Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 18:30
Posts: 9
fergl100 wrote:
I heard a radio programme at the weekend on offsetting carbon emissions when you buy a landrover. You buy what appeared to be some trees in Scotland, from a company, when you buy your car and this will supposedly offset for 3 years your carbon. On investigation, the trees were already planted so you wern't paying for new planting just a guarantee that some trees will not be chopped down. Even then the landowners said they had no intention of cutting the trees down anyway. Sounded like one big con, with the middle company getting the profits.

It might well be a con, although with their con they charge just £31 for the equivalent of a year's 4x4 emissions (on average mileage). And yet Richmond Council would have you believe the 4x4's emissions are worth £700+, while that prat Miliband wants to slap a couple of grand tax on them. :banghead:

There's an online petition been set up about this at http://www.petitiononline.com/greentax/petition.html - I hope Paul doesn't mind me mentioning it here (by all means delete if inappropriate).

Please sign up to it and pass the link on if you agree with its sentiments. Thanks. :)


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 19:07 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
And when did any UK political party bypass the idea that some new theory was not an invitation to make brits guilty ,and then slap another tax on the country to make the voters feel that they had performed some act of absolution.

Henry V111 chased out the pope and payment for absolution of sins , to be replaced years later by a Labour Government determined to make us pay through the nose to absolve our crimes against any thing they thought fit.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 19:17 
Offline
New User
New User

Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 18:30
Posts: 9
botach wrote:
And when did any UK political party bypass the idea that some new theory was not an invitation to make brits guilty ,and then slap another tax on the country to make the voters feel that they had performed some act of absolution.

What really winds me up about this is that we're not being given a choice. Labour, Lib Dems and Tories all have their snouts in the same trough on this.

Now there's a good argument for rule by referendum if ever there was one.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 19:29 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
overtaxed wrote:
botach wrote:
And when did any UK political party bypass the idea that some new theory was not an invitation to make brits guilty ,and then slap another tax on the country to make the voters feel that they had performed some act of absolution.

What really winds me up about this is that we're not being given a choice. Labour, Lib Dems and Tories all have their snouts in the same trough on this.

quote]

Trouble is that as voters ,we have not put enough mustard in the trough to deter putting snouts in there :roll:


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 23:35 
Offline
User

Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2006 00:51
Posts: 160
so called Global warming is a Natural Occurance, Do Politicians think we are all Stupid?

_________________
Welcome to the UK, the Land of "Selective Freedoms"


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 31, 2006 00:14 
Offline
New User
New User

Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 18:30
Posts: 9
traitorblair wrote:
Do Politicians think we are all Stupid?

Damn right they do. :x

At least the people aren't being fooled - even the BBC's Have Your Say, usually dominated by Guardianistas, is filled with anger about YET MORE taxes being dumped on us all.

The big problem is that all the main parties are now trying it on and the electorate just won't be given a choice on this issue.

How exactly do we rebel against this nonsense?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 31, 2006 00:36 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 00:04
Posts: 2311
overtaxed wrote:
How exactly do we rebel against this nonsense?


It's Guy Fawkes night on sunday :twisted:


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 41 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.031s | 11 Queries | GZIP : Off ]