Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Tue Nov 11, 2025 06:07

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Dec 02, 2004 16:53 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 09:16
Posts: 3655
Quote:
Freeze on fuel duty ignores the environment, says Transport 2000

We’re disappointed but not surprised that the Chancellor has dropped the fuel duty increase. The increase would have been minimal but it sends a crucial message to motorists.
:cry:

Quote:
This decision is everything to do with a coming election and nothing to do with the environment.
:roll:

Quote:
Despite the rise in crude oil prices, more fuel efficient cars means that motoring costs are not in fact increasing.

And you point is....

Use more fuel they moan, use less fuel they moan...You just can't please some people... :evil:

_________________
Speed camera policy Kills


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 02, 2004 19:36 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2004 13:36
Posts: 1339
Quote:
Freeze on fuel duty ignores the environment, says Transport 2000

We’re disappointed but not surprised that the Chancellor has dropped the fuel duty increase. The increase would have been minimal but it sends a crucial message to motorists.


The message that they shouldn't go to work or buy food shopping? :?

Quote:
Despite the rise in crude oil prices, more fuel efficient cars means that motoring costs are not in fact increasing.


And I suppose they would like to see cars use more fuel per mile just in order to screw the motorist? Yet in the last paragraph they said it was about environmental concern... unbelievable.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 03, 2004 17:52 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2004 16:02
Posts: 372
It's about cost. Their idea is tokeep raising the fuel duty to make it too expensive for people to drive their own cars and force us onto public transport.

The new Dot Web site thingy says it will take 3-5 times longer for me to get to work on public transport than by car.

(for those that don;t know it they have a new £50m scheme that you can put in a start and destination postcode and it is supposed to give you the best travel times by car, train, bus etc - except it doesn't work properly)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 03, 2004 18:45 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 09:16
Posts: 3655
stackmonkey wrote:
It's about cost. Their idea is tokeep raising the fuel duty to make it too expensive for people to drive their own cars and force us onto public transport.


What the tw*ts at T2000 don't realise is that if they made car driving as expensive as public transport WE WILL STILL USE OUR CARS.

Mine is parked outside the house, avalable 24/7, has climate control, a decent sound system, good seats and is fun to drive.

You don't get that on a number 19 bus.... :lol:

_________________
Speed camera policy Kills


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 03, 2004 18:51 
Offline
User

Joined: Thu Jul 08, 2004 21:17
Posts: 15
The idea to get the great unwashed out of their cars and into public transport is a EU idea (notice politicos never give up their cars which the tax payer generously funds).
I wonder what 50m could have been better spent on and it's a fair bet that outside of London you'll be quicker and (currently) cheaper by car. I wonder how high fuel tax will go if there is a labour chancellor after the next election

_________________
Stupid is as Stupid does


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 04, 2004 02:27 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 11:18
Posts: 67
Location: Nottingham
I sometimes use the bus to go into town (Nottingham) to shop or for a few drinks, etc. I have intended to use it 15-20 times in the last year. 4 of these times the damn thing didn't turn up, seriously screwing with my plans. Two of these times I got a taxi, the other two I got in the car and drove.

We have no good alternative to the car unlike our european neighbours.

Similarly my journey to work is 12 miles and takes 20 - 35 minutes by car. To attempt the same journey on the bus takes over an hour and involves 2 buses into and out of town.

It is a shame as on the surface we have a cracking bus service but it is not reliable and difficult to use unless you are going to the city.

The government have us all over a barrel.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 27, 2005 00:54 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 23:09
Posts: 6737
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
http://www.transport2000.org.uk/news/ma ... icleID=241

"An increase in rail freight would reduce our reliance on oil."

Accompanies picture of diesel loco. Doh!

_________________
"Show me someone who says that they have never exceeded a speed limit, and I'll show you a liar, or a menace." (Austin Williams - Director, Transport Research Group)

Any views expressed in this post are personal opinions and may not represent the views of Safe Speed


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 27, 2005 01:07 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2004 23:42
Posts: 3820
PeterE wrote:
http://www.transport2000.org.uk/news/maintainNewsArticles.asp?NewsArticleID=241

"An increase in rail freight would reduce our reliance on oil."

Accompanies picture of diesel loco. Doh!


:lol: :wink:

Says it all really! :roll:

_________________
Take with a chuckle or a grain of salt
Drive without COAST and it's all your own fault!

A SMILE is a curve that sets everything straight (P Diller).

A Smiley Per post
FINES USfor our COAST!


Approach love and cooking with reckless abandon - but driving with a smile and a COAST calm mind.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 27, 2005 21:28 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 09:16
Posts: 3655
I wonder what the fuel consumption of a bus with half a dozen passengers on board is?

A lot more than 6 cars I'll bet.

_________________
Speed camera policy Kills


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 28, 2005 22:21 
Offline
New User
New User

Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2005 19:00
Posts: 6
PeterE wrote:
http://www.transport2000.org.uk/news/maintainNewsArticles.asp?NewsArticleID=241

"An increase in rail freight would reduce our reliance on oil."

Accompanies picture of diesel loco. Doh!


I wonder if T2000 have the figures available for how many town centres, supermarkts, garages, hospitals, schools, engineering firms, building sites, to name a few, have their own railway sidings. :evil:

_________________
English first, British second,
European? What's that?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 29, 2005 17:13 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 18:38
Posts: 396
Location: Glasgow
T 2000 say about there forum:-
Please note too that any messages containing inappropriate language are automatically filtered out.

I posted a message which did not contain inappropriate language, it's not my style, but it was not put on the forum. They must filter for other reasons. At least safe speed's forum gives all views a voice.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 29, 2005 17:34 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2005 04:56
Posts: 95
Location: Hertfordshire
Gizmo wrote:
I wonder what the fuel consumption of a bus with half a dozen passengers on board is?

A lot more than 6 cars I'll bet.



I read somewhere (sorry don't have the reference) that it had been worked out that a full passenger train, with every seat occupied, used about twice as much fuel, and had about twice the environmental impact, as the same number of people in private cars.

Does anyone know the source of this study? :?

_________________
'The normally careful and competent actions of a reasonable person should be considered legal, regardless of the letter of statute'

Rioman, Herts


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 29, 2005 17:42 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2005 14:00
Posts: 1271
Location: Near Telford, UK / Barcelona, Spain
fergl100 wrote:
T 2000 say about there forum:-
Please note too that any messages containing inappropriate language are automatically filtered out.

I posted a message which did not contain inappropriate language, it's not my style, but it was not put on the forum. They must filter for other reasons. At least safe speed's forum gives all views a voice.

I think you'll find that they filter out anyone with the independence of mind or the temerity to express an heretical opinion..

"Apostate! Burn Him!! :)

_________________
"Politicians are the same the world over... We build bridges where there aren't any rivers." - Nikita Kruschev


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 29, 2005 18:06 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member

Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2004 13:50
Posts: 2643
pogo wrote:
I think you'll find that they filter out anyone with the independence of mind or the temerity to express an heretical opinion..


No wonder they're so entrenched in their beliefs - they never see an opposing point of view.

Or do the moderators think that their members aren't intelligent enough to fight their own battles?
Could be that that's what they're worried about - any intelligent members might up and leave if they were allowed to think for themselves.

Cheers
Peter


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 29, 2005 18:08 
Offline
User

Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 09:26
Posts: 350
I like to think of T2000 as the opposite of ABD. Both have extreme views at opposite ends of the spectrum. Fortunately the majority of us fall somewhere in between.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 29, 2005 18:19 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 23:09
Posts: 6737
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
Peyote wrote:
I like to think of T2000 as the opposite of ABD. Both have extreme views at opposite ends of the spectrum. Fortunately the majority of us fall somewhere in between.

There is an important difference - T2000 is funded by the public transport industry, the ABD is funded entirely by individual subscriptions and donations.

_________________
"Show me someone who says that they have never exceeded a speed limit, and I'll show you a liar, or a menace." (Austin Williams - Director, Transport Research Group)

Any views expressed in this post are personal opinions and may not represent the views of Safe Speed


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 29, 2005 18:26 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member

Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2004 13:50
Posts: 2643
Peyote wrote:
I like to think of T2000 as the opposite of ABD. Both have extreme views at opposite ends of the spectrum. Fortunately the majority of us fall somewhere in between.


I don't believe the ABD views can be classed as 'extreme'.

Cheers
Peter


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 02, 2005 16:59 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 18:38
Posts: 396
Location: Glasgow
Quote:
Both have extreme views at opposite ends of the spectrum


I don't like the word "extreme" to describe views, I think it's overused.
On two occasions recently I have been labelled an extreme atheist. It's a cheap way of putting someones arguement down.
Although both T2000 and the ABD have different views I'm not going to call either extreme.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 12, 2005 15:43 
Offline
New User
New User

Joined: Thu May 12, 2005 11:51
Posts: 7
Rioman wrote:
Gizmo wrote:
I wonder what the fuel consumption of a bus with half a dozen passengers on board is?

A lot more than 6 cars I'll bet.



I read somewhere (sorry don't have the reference) that it had been worked out that a full passenger train, with every seat occupied, used about twice as much fuel, and had about twice the environmental impact, as the same number of people in private cars.

Does anyone know the source of this study? :?


If i recall correctly it was carried out at Bristol Uni - if thats any help


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 12, 2005 19:40 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
stackmonkey wrote:
It's about cost. Their idea is tokeep raising the fuel duty to make it too expensive for people to drive their own cars and force us onto public transport.

The new Dot Web site thingy says it will take 3-5 times longer for me to get to work on public transport than by car.

(for those that don;t know it they have a new £50m scheme that you can put in a start and destination postcode and it is supposed to give you the best travel times by car, train, bus etc - except it doesn't work properly)


Don't need the web site thingy - know that if i get a bus at 6.30 and another two trains and then walk about half a mile i'll still be half an hour late, then at stopping time . i'll have to walk about half a mile to get a train half an hour later to then have to wait up to an hour for a bus or walk 2 miles to get home at 7.30 at night.
By car it's about 20 mile on the M6 or 12 by the lanes - takes about half an hour.
Now why do i have a car??


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.015s | 11 Queries | GZIP : Off ]