SafeSpeed wrote:
Outcast wrote:
How much support do people think the under equipped & underpaid soldiers who were sent to a streetwar we had no business being in will give to our government ?
To the Squaddies reading this...
I support you 100%
Not the reasons you were sent there though.
This is a difficult area for me personally. I have a hard time supporting (in spirit) soldiers who went into a war that every thinking person knew was illegitimate. Yet I want to be able to support those who 'fight for our country'.
Should I be happy that our soldiers were perhaps 'unthinking'?
Does anyone want to help me unravel these moral questions?
Yes you should be happy, you are confusing your moral objection to the conflict with the absolute need for members of the armed forces to do as they are ordered. Aim your ire at the government, but don't ever suggest that our soldiers are 'unthinking' just because they dutifully go off and serve their country. You do not get to hold the moral highground on us/them just because you have the luxury of being able to 'advocate' everything in your own mind before acting. If the armed forces were given the remit to do similar for every scenario they found themselves in, we would be in a right mess, unable to act in the knowledge that the troops on the ground would do as they were instructed. Before I departed these shores in 2003 for goodness knows where, I stated to my colleagues that had 'a bad feeling about it all'.
But I still went. Why? Becuase I had signed up to service in HM forces, had drawn the pay for more 20 odd years and had known
exactly what the conditions were all along. If I had decided to try and back out because my (or even someone else's) moral compass told me it was not right, then I would have been ashamed of myself for the rest of my life.