Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Tue Apr 28, 2026 20:23

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 50 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jul 01, 2007 16:58 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
bombus wrote:
Paul, as an ardent smoker (still, AFAIK), what are your views on the smoking ban?


Call me a happy smoker. No plans to quit. And ESPECIALLY no plans to quit under government pressure.

I think the ban is highly objectionable, a) because the science does not support it, b) because the market can (and has been) accomodating the desires of all, c) because the state has no business interfering (what next? dangeous sports?), d) because the ban is extremely expensive to taxpayers everywhere, e) because it further divides society, and f) because it encourages petty hitlers, nimbys and the 'ban it' culture.

And finally because I used to enjoy a cigarette in a cinema (yeah, long ago) or after a meal.

edited to add: g) - I almost forgot - because of the inevitable damage to pubs, clubs and restaurants.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jul 01, 2007 17:41 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 00:11
Posts: 764
Location: Sofa
malcolmw wrote:
Peter,

Do you know typical circumstances for people getting fined for smoking in vehicles? This seems strange at first glance. Who reports them?
Not that difficult to spot, TBH. Liveried vehicle? Anyone smoking? If the answer to both is yes then an offence is being committed, most likely.

Chances are it's one council department catching another in the council car park!

_________________
Less Kodak, more Kojak.
In times of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jul 01, 2007 17:45 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 00:11
Posts: 764
Location: Sofa
SafeSpeed wrote:
I think the ban is highly objectionable, b) because the market can (and has been) accomodating the desires of all
Paul, you are living in cloud cuckoo land if you think the 'desires of all' were accommodated before the ban came in.

_________________
Less Kodak, more Kojak.
In times of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jul 01, 2007 17:46 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 23:09
Posts: 6737
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
MrsMiggins wrote:
Chances are it's one council department catching another in the council car park!

Yes, that's what I suspected, particularly as you can't fine anyone unless you know who they are.

_________________
"Show me someone who says that they have never exceeded a speed limit, and I'll show you a liar, or a menace." (Austin Williams - Director, Transport Research Group)

Any views expressed in this post are personal opinions and may not represent the views of Safe Speed


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jul 01, 2007 17:54 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 23:09
Posts: 6737
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
MrsMiggins wrote:
SafeSpeed wrote:
I think the ban is highly objectionable, b) because the market can (and has been) accomodating the desires of all

Paul, you are living in cloud cuckoo land if you think the 'desires of all' were accommodated before the ban came in.

There was a growing number of pubs that were either entirely or mainly non-smoking.

One pub I regularly visit decided last year to confine smoking just to the tap-room, leaving the rest of the pub non-smoking. This was in accordance with the wishes of the customers was generally regarded as fair. But the best craic was always in the tap-room.

In reality, the number of people who were so opposed to smoking that they were disinclined to visit pubs altogether was always pretty small and therefore operators saw little benefit in catering for them.

There have been examples of pubs banning smoking and then having to back-track, as trade fell off a cliff, for example this one in Swansea.

Also Wetherspoon's said they would make all their pubs non-smoking before the ban, and then rapidly had second thoughts:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/4769474.stm

Quote:
While total sales rose 1% to £406.3m, revenues at its non-smoking pubs fell 7.6%, as the outlets sold less beer but more food, the group said.

By the way, for the avoidance of doubt, I am a non-smoker of many years' standing and have never smoked more than occasionally.

_________________
"Show me someone who says that they have never exceeded a speed limit, and I'll show you a liar, or a menace." (Austin Williams - Director, Transport Research Group)

Any views expressed in this post are personal opinions and may not represent the views of Safe Speed


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jul 01, 2007 17:57 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
MrsMiggins wrote:
SafeSpeed wrote:
I think the ban is highly objectionable, b) because the market can (and has been) accomodating the desires of all
Paul, you are living in cloud cuckoo land if you think the 'desires of all' were accommodated before the ban came in.


Really? So the market couldn't make no smoking pubs, clubs and so on, if the demand was there?

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jul 01, 2007 17:57 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 12:01
Posts: 4815
Location: Essex
Our firm has banned people from smoking in their own cars while on company premises - including the car park.

I have visions now of cars queueing up the road, causing chaos, while the one in the front of the makeshit queue finishes their smoke before turning off the road into the car park. No doubt hooting will ensue and encourage this renegade behaviour.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jul 01, 2007 17:59 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 23:09
Posts: 6737
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
Roger wrote:
I have visions now of cars queueing up the road, causing chaos, while the one in the front of the makeshit queue finishes their smoke before turning off the road into the car park. No doubt hooting will ensue and encourage this renegade behaviour.

A Freudian slip? :lol:

_________________
"Show me someone who says that they have never exceeded a speed limit, and I'll show you a liar, or a menace." (Austin Williams - Director, Transport Research Group)

Any views expressed in this post are personal opinions and may not represent the views of Safe Speed


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jul 01, 2007 18:04 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 12:01
Posts: 4815
Location: Essex
:oops: :oops: oops :lol: :lol:


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jul 01, 2007 18:06 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 23:09
Posts: 6737
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
I saw one on another forum the other day when someone (who admittedly has severe dyslexia and struggles to spell words correctly) described a dispenser as a depeniser :yikes: :lol:

_________________
"Show me someone who says that they have never exceeded a speed limit, and I'll show you a liar, or a menace." (Austin Williams - Director, Transport Research Group)

Any views expressed in this post are personal opinions and may not represent the views of Safe Speed


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jul 01, 2007 18:12 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 00:11
Posts: 764
Location: Sofa
I found that going out with a group of friends was always a problem if one was a smoker. "I won't go if I can't smoke" was always the refrain, which to me seems pretty selfish if everyone else would prefer not to spend the evening in a smoke filled environment and end up with stinking clothes; but I suppose going without a substance you are addicted to isn't anyone's idea of a fun night out either.

So we went from one extreme - let's go where the smokers want or we can't go at all - to the other extreme - don't let anyone smoke and to hell with what the smokers want. Did all the smoking friends lock themselves at home and refuse to go to work or out for a drink a la jp? Of course not. They adapted and we still go out for the evening. If they want to smoke they pop outside and it's not a huge imposition. Many of them gave up instead and are happy that they took the opportunity to do so. If we go out with smokers in the group we try to go somewhere with decent outdoor facilities, but it's never been a huge issue since the ban came in up here and most smokers I know wonder why it took so long to ban it.

I'm really torn about the ban, TBH. Like you Pete I'm not happy about the ever increasing regulation of our lives but, on the other hand, I'm happy that I can go to the pub and enjoy a drink without all that smoke/smell etc On balance I think the ban was the right thing.

Does being a member here but agreeing with the smoking ban make me a hypocrite? Maybe...

_________________
Less Kodak, more Kojak.
In times of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jul 01, 2007 18:18 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 23:09
Posts: 6737
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
MrsMiggins wrote:
So we went from one extreme - let's go where the smokers want or we can't go at all - to the other extreme - don't let anyone smoke and to hell with what the smokers want. Did all the smoking friends lock themselves at home and refuse to go to work or out for a drink a la jp? Of course not. They adapted and we still go out for the evening. If they want to smoke they pop outside and it's not a huge imposition. Many of them gave up instead and are happy that they took the opportunity to do so. If we go out with smokers in the group we try to go somewhere with decent outdoor facilities, but it's never been a huge issue since the ban came in up here and most smokers I know wonder why it took so long to ban it.

It isn't true to say life just goes on as before, it doesn't.

There's plenty of evidence that the ban has had a significant effect on the licensed trade in Scotland, for example:

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/u ... 555585.ece

Quote:
Smoking ban has hit pubs, Scots say

Publicans in Scotland gave a stark warning to their counterparts in England over the impact of a smoking ban, saying that jobs had been lost in a third of pubs since the restriction came into force (David Lister writes).

Approaching the first anniversary of the ban, the Scottish Licensed Trade Association said that 34 per cent of pubs had laid off staff, and only 3 per cent had taken on more. According to a survey of 530 of its members, 56 per cent reported fewer visits from regulars and 30 per cent complained of fewer new customers. Drink sales have fallen by 11 per cent and food sales by 3 per cent, the poll suggested.

I suppose at the end of the day it's a question of what is more important to you, the company of smokers or avoiding the smell of smoke.

_________________
"Show me someone who says that they have never exceeded a speed limit, and I'll show you a liar, or a menace." (Austin Williams - Director, Transport Research Group)

Any views expressed in this post are personal opinions and may not represent the views of Safe Speed


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jul 01, 2007 18:23 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
MrsMiggins wrote:
I found that going out with a group of friends was always a problem if one was a smoker. "I won't go if I can't smoke" was always the refrain, which to me seems pretty selfish if everyone else would prefer not to spend the evening in a smoke filled environment and end up with stinking clothes; but I suppose going without a substance you are addicted to isn't anyone's idea of a fun night out either.


I'm absolutely vicious about that - no smoking means no custom. And I'm most certainly not going to change my behaviour for a government ban. So now I'm banned from pubs, clubs and restaurants. Tough. I hope they all go broke for failing to stand up for their customers' rights. Of course if everyone stood by such principles we wouldn't have these bans...

MrsMiggins wrote:
Does being a member here but agreeing with the smoking ban make me a hypocrite? Maybe...


I can't see why. This campaign is about the best way to make the roads safer. If 'ban it' looked like the answer we'd have to support it.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jul 01, 2007 18:33 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 00:11
Posts: 764
Location: Sofa
PeterE wrote:
I suppose at the end of the day it's a question of what is more important to you, the company of smokers or avoiding the smell of smoke.
OR

It's up to the smokers really. What's more important to them? Their cigarettes or a night out with their friends?

_________________
Less Kodak, more Kojak.
In times of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jul 01, 2007 20:02 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 09:01
Posts: 1548
bombus wrote:
When I gave up I found that my sense of smell and taste improved markedly. I hadn't really noticed that they had got worse in the first place. I can now smell a crafty ciggy from miles off, and realise that there must have been times that I thought I was undetectable but wasn't. :( TBH that was about the only thing I did notice when I stopped (no great fitness improvement or anything like that, alas).

Same here, even after such a short time off the fags I can smell a cigarette on the go at 500 paces (not literally of course, but I'm sure you get my drift).
I have also noticed that I can smell a smoker from a reasonable distance before they get to me as well.

Fitness wise I doubt things will improve.
My last check up 2 months ago showed a heart rate of 63 with a BP of 110/65 which (according to my GP) is pretty good. On the spirometry test, I blew it off the scale.

All the above figures certainly surprised me, because I do all the things that are bad for you to excess and I have to be one of the laziest ba****ds on the planet when it comes to actually exerting myself.

_________________
What makes you think I'm drunk officer, have I got a fat bird with me?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jul 01, 2007 20:53 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 14:26
Posts: 4364
Location: Hampshire/Wiltshire Border
I am waiting for a report back from my bingo hall correspondent on tonight's arrangements. The point is that a much greater proportion of bingo attendees smoke than in the general population and I will be interested to see what the effect is on this more extreme situation.

... and no I don't smoke and never have.

_________________
Malcolm W.
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not represent the views of Safespeed.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jul 01, 2007 20:56 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 14:26
Posts: 4364
Location: Hampshire/Wiltshire Border
Gixxer wrote:
My last check up 2 months ago showed a heart rate of 63 with a BP of 110/65 which (according to my GP) is pretty good. On the spirometry test, I blew it off the scale.

Blood pressure seems to be a "moveable feast" as a few years ago I was considered to have OK pressure. Now, with the same numbers, I am over the safe limit as the guidance has changed.

You are right though, your numbers look good. :)

_________________
Malcolm W.
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not represent the views of Safespeed.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jul 01, 2007 21:23 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
MrsMiggins wrote:

It's up to the smokers really. What's more important to them? Their cigarettes or a night out with their friends?


Or a compromise - i was used to the old fashioned work bench - we all had ashtrays on our bench, and probably let more fags burn out than actually smoked. Before i gave up , it became custom to ask any non smokers in the vehicle if hey minded, if we opened windows. I am still accustomed to smokers - half the blokes at work do , but they respect our rights, so no one is offended. Likewise at home Mrs B smokes - has tried to pack in ,but can't ,so it's something i've got to live with. On reflection , possibly i was one of the worst offenders ,smoking in open company -so why can i critisise something i was guilty of .I've seen too many hardened ex smokers preach.

Something the ex smokers should think on, prehaps .

_________________
lets bring sanity back to speed limits.
Drivers are like donkeys -they respond best to a carrot, not a stick .Road safety experts are like Asses - best kept covered up ,or sat on


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jul 01, 2007 21:48 
Offline
Magistrate
Magistrate

Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2005 13:58
Posts: 1155
SafeSpeed wrote:
So now I'm banned from pubs, clubs and restaurants.

And I'm allowed to go to pubs, clubs and restaurants.

I am old enough to remember the days when country pubs were going to disappear because the breath test had been brought in.
I shall be interested to see what difference it actually makes.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jul 01, 2007 21:50 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 23:09
Posts: 6737
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
fisherman wrote:
SafeSpeed wrote:
So now I'm banned from pubs, clubs and restaurants.

And I'm allowed to go to pubs, clubs and restaurants.

I am old enough to remember the days when country pubs were going to disappear because the breath test had been brought in.

Vast numbers of country pubs have disappeared - hadn't you noticed?

_________________
"Show me someone who says that they have never exceeded a speed limit, and I'll show you a liar, or a menace." (Austin Williams - Director, Transport Research Group)

Any views expressed in this post are personal opinions and may not represent the views of Safe Speed


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 50 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 48 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.071s | 11 Queries | GZIP : Off ]