Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Sun Jun 07, 2026 00:28

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 48 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 20, 2006 10:47 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 00:45
Posts: 1016
Location: Mighty Tamworth
Economic Left/Right: -3.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.72

_________________
Oct 11 Birmingham Half Marathon. I am running for the British Heart Foundation.
http://www.justgiving.com/Rob-Taylor


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 20, 2006 20:57 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Jul 23, 2006 20:35
Posts: 75
Location: Lincoln
Economic L/R -6.25
Social Lib/Auth -3.85

Further left than I thought but, like other folks, I wasn't happy with any of the available responses for some questions. Still, somewhere near Ghandi so not too bad. :)

_________________
"Experience isn't everything - but it's most of it".

Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to get you.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 21, 2006 03:27 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 00:01
Posts: 2258
Location: South Wales
Economic Left/Right: -4.63
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.59

So that's libertarian left.

And I'm more anti-artifically-low-speed-limit than anti camera. If the law wasn't wrong then the cameras would not be necessary to enforce it.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 21, 2006 12:52 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 23:17
Posts: 499
My political compass:
Economic Left/Right: 2.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.10

I would have described my political orientation as right wing liberal, before taking this test, and this test has confirmed it!

I am antispeed camera but not anti speed enforcement. I too would like to add that this view point was formed on the the basis of evidence rather than emotion.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 21, 2006 13:19 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 20:28
Posts: 1267
Location: not too far in front, not too far behind.
My political compass:
Economic Left/Right: -5.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.59

Closer to Gandhi than Thatcher. I don't own any flip flops though.

Has anyone plotted all of the answers on a graph yet?

_________________
COAST Not just somewhere to keep a beach.

A young loner on a crusade to champion the cause of the innocent, the helpless, the powerless, in a world of criminals who operate above the law.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 21, 2006 19:18 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 10:30
Posts: 2053
Location: South Wales (Roving all UK)
right wing libertarian,

did it 5 years ago and was the same.

3.50 & -1.78ish


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 21, 2006 20:06 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 23:17
Posts: 499
There are lots of left-wingers on here according to the results, just out of interest who reads the Guardian? Would be interesting to see if there is a correlation between estimated political orientation and news paper choice.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 21, 2006 20:41 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 00:01
Posts: 2258
Location: South Wales
I don't read any papers, but if I did I would probably pick a more right wing publication.

The reason for this is it's easier to pick out bullshit if the paper isn't pandering to your views, so you're more likely to form a valid opinion


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 21, 2006 23:41 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 18:54
Posts: 4036
Location: Cumbria
What I want to know, is how on earth they got Stalin and Hitler to fill in the online questionnaire?!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 21, 2006 23:58 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
Mole wrote:
What I want to know, is how on earth they got Stalin and Hitler to fill in the online questionnaire?!


:rotfl:

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 22, 2006 00:12 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 21:10
Posts: 1693
I must say, I would like to know *how* they work out where diferent political parties/individuals actually lie ( :lol: )

There may be a way of checking this (Though it may take a little while)

I am interested however in just *how* strongly many people round here seem to congragete in the "Lower left corner" of the map though!

This isnt just "diferent" to the current political enviroment! It is "Diametrically opposed" to it!

According to "Political map" almost everybody here would be Green if they (The Greens) werent so anti-car (ie anti-Personal transport! it doesnt mean we are all terminal petrol-heads you know!(But I *do* miss My Jag V12 HmNNNNNN :D ))

And it is true! I am Green! I care about my enviroment and that is why I support the mass construction of pebble bed reactor Nuclear power stations! along with photovoltaics on all new build houses ( a more detailed description of my energy policy is available on request :) )

_________________
"The road to a police state is paved with public safety legislation"


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 22, 2006 01:26 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 16:51
Posts: 1323
Location: Stafford - a short distance past hope
Dusty wrote:
According to "Political map" almost everybody here would be Green if they (The Greens) werent so anti-car (ie anti-Personal transport! it doesnt mean we are all terminal petrol-heads you know!(But I *do* miss My Jag V12 HmNNNNNN :D ))

And it is true! I am Green! I care about my enviroment and that is why I support the mass construction of pebble bed reactor Nuclear power stations! along with photovoltaics on all new build houses ( a more detailed description of my energy policy is available on request :) )


I'm really green too! I want fusion asap!!!!

Seriously though, the "grid" has problems with the siting of the greens - the green "politicals" are, IMHO, actually authoritarian (or would be given half a chance) - they are also diametrically opposed to the "orthodox" extreme left in being both un- and anti-scientific (even in their anti-capitalism - which evidences no understanding of how that system works)


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 22, 2006 01:44 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2004 18:42
Posts: 1283
Location: Essex
Economic Left/Right: -5.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.87

_________________
Gordon Brown saying I got the country into it's current economic mess so I'll get us out of it is the same as Bomber Harris nipping over to Dresden and offering to repair a few windows.

Chaos, panic and disorder - my work here is done.

http://www.wildcrafts.co.uk


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 22, 2006 06:26 
Offline
Suspended
Suspended

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 14:55
Posts: 364
Location: Ignoring the mental pygmies (and there are a lot of them here)
..

_________________
Q. Are you a stupid fascist with limited reading skills or are you just a retard?


Last edited by FJSRiDER on Wed Oct 04, 2006 14:58, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 22, 2006 07:19 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 22:02
Posts: 3266
Economic Left/Right: -2.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.18

One third in the direction of Nelson Mandella... :)

_________________
Speed limit sign radio interview. TV Snap Unhappy
“It has never been the rule in this country – I hope it never will be - that suspected criminal offences must automatically be the subject of prosecution” He added that there should be a prosecution: “wherever it appears that the offence or the circumstances of its commission is or are of such a character that a prosecution in respect thereof is required in the public interest”
This approach has been endorsed by Attorney General ever since 1951. CPS Code


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 22, 2006 09:29 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 21:10
Posts: 1693
FJSRiDER wrote:
Dusty wrote:
I am interested however in just *how* strongly many people round here seem to congragete in the "Lower left corner" of the map though!

This isnt just "diferent" to the current political enviroment! It is "Diametrically opposed" to it!

According to "Political map" almost everybody here would be Green

It could be the political parties that are diametrically opposed, is this so different to the real 'political map'? The populous appear to be effectively disenfranchised from the political process by spin doctoring and obfuscation that I'm not sure how much of 'the peoples' views are represented anyway.


Thats why I sad "Political Enviroment" rather than "What most people think"

I would be interested in the result from, say 1000 people taken at random! (Subject, of course, to their assessment of the various political parties being correct-which it may not be)

Might explain why turnout is so low these days

_________________
"The road to a police state is paved with public safety legislation"


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 22, 2006 09:39 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 23:09
Posts: 6737
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
I was listening to Radio 5 Live last night and they had as a guest Sean Gabb of the Libertarian Alliance who was saying that all the main political parties now put forward variations on the same theme, so a lot of people (possibly most people) are effectively disenfranchised.

Parties are now more like businesses trying to get the electorate to buy their particular product rather than actually representing a particular set of ideas and values.

_________________
"Show me someone who says that they have never exceeded a speed limit, and I'll show you a liar, or a menace." (Austin Williams - Director, Transport Research Group)

Any views expressed in this post are personal opinions and may not represent the views of Safe Speed


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 22, 2006 09:40 
Offline
User

Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2005 18:39
Posts: 346
Economic Left/Right: -3.63
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.62

Dammit - a libertarian pope :lol:


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 22, 2006 10:15 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
Dusty wrote:
I would be interested in the result from, say 1000 people taken at random! (Subject, of course, to their assessment of the various political parties being correct-which it may not be)


Surely a sample of 1,000 should end up as average (0,0) and if they didn't then there's something wrong with the centering of the scales? What other yardstick could we possibly have?

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 22, 2006 10:25 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 23:09
Posts: 6737
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
SafeSpeed wrote:
Surely a sample of 1,000 should end up as average (0,0) and if they didn't then there's something wrong with the centering of the scales? What other yardstick could we possibly have?

I think the scales are rather American-biased. Virtually all people here come out with a minus score on the Social Libertarian/Authoritarian axis, which I think stems from the fact that a lot of the questions have a religious element, and we in the UK are much less religious than the Americans.

If translated to the UK we might have more questions like "Should convicted paedophiles automatically be imprisoned for life?" or whatever.

_________________
"Show me someone who says that they have never exceeded a speed limit, and I'll show you a liar, or a menace." (Austin Williams - Director, Transport Research Group)

Any views expressed in this post are personal opinions and may not represent the views of Safe Speed


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 48 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.058s | 11 Queries | GZIP : Off ]