Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Fri Jul 24, 2026 05:18

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 43 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 16, 2005 17:34 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 09:59
Posts: 3544
Location: Shropshire
Pete317 wrote:
Rigpig wrote:
SafeSpeed wrote:
The law depends on the perception that it's fair.


Does it? If the well off are forced to pay higher fines than those on lower wages then former may think this is unfair, the latter would probably maintain that it was fair.
If on the other hand everyone has to pay the same fine for similar offences, the less well off may argue that they are paying out more of their disposable (er) income than the 'toffs'. In other words, the former think this is fair, the latter, unfair.
So by who's perception does the law have to be seen to be fair?


It's the Law which must be seen to be fair. You're talking about the punishment.

If there was a law against stepping on cracks on the pavement, or against coughing in a public place, and the police were ready to pounce on everybody who accidentally stepped on a crack, or coughed, the law would be seen as being grossly unfair by virtually everyone. Nobody would be arguing over the amount of the fine, they'd be rightly calling for the law to be scrapped.

Regards
Peter


Fair point, well presented.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 16, 2005 22:10 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 09:16
Posts: 3655
Zamzara wrote:
copyright isn't a criminal matter.


Think again...
http://www.bva.org.uk/content.asp?id=6822&headline=38

_________________
Speed camera policy Kills


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 17, 2005 12:34 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 08, 2004 22:20
Posts: 26
spankthecrumpet wrote:
Quote:
If a "poor" person is fined £50 for an offence (based on the day nett income model) and a "rich" person is fined £500 for the same offence, what would happen if they both refused to pay and were sent to jail?

Would the £500 defaulter be sentenced to a longer stretch than the £50 convict? Which is the more serious crime?


Oooh, that does get rather interesting - presumably the seriousness is proportional to the income. So billy gates could probably get around 2 hours in gaol for the full 15 grand fine, where as a tramp would get life for £50....


No. Following the same logic as 'the more you earn, the more you get fined' :roll: you would spend longer in jail if you had a longer projected lifespan. i.e. if you were 18 years old you'd get 6 months, if you were 70 years old you'd get a week. :lol:


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 43 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 171 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.049s | 11 Queries | GZIP : Off ]