Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Thu Apr 23, 2026 23:42

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Big brother get nearer
PostPosted: Thu Sep 30, 2004 09:21 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 09:16
Posts: 3655
Quote:
The AA Motoring Trust has been reading the runes about what's likely to happen with the proposed new driving licence system, and reckons that, following consultations earlier this year, the idea of needing to carry a paper counterpart of the photo card (the paper document being as big as the one used on its own at the moment) seems likely to be scrapped.

It's happy about that, but doesn't altogether like the Department for Transport's proposal to have a "smart chip" on the licence. The Trust's position is that, "If a smart chip is introduced, then the Government should only allow driver information that is already on the paper licence to be on the chip.

"We need to be clear from the start how much information goes on it, what the information is, and who it can be read by. Drivers must also have ready access to the information on the chip, just like they can with the current paper counterpart."

There are, of course, deep suspicions in certain quarters about the possibility of the chip having far more personal information on it than the authorities in a non-police state have any business knowing.

Meanwhile, the Association of British Drivers has drawn attention to a proposal by the DVLA to introduce a new annual fee, £4.50 being the sum mentioned, to be paid along with the Vehicle Excise Duty charged for every vehicle registered on its system - but also including cars which are currently exempt from VED, like those run by disabled drivers, pre-1973 classic cars, and cars kept off the road under the SORN regulations.

Reason for the proposed new impost? To help pay for the introduction of the photo licences.


You can just imagine the future scenario. You have to put your driving licence into a reader before you use the car. Pay per mile tax (the card could store mileage information). GPS tracking, Speed cameras reading transponder information transmitted by the car...need I go on?

_________________
Speed camera policy Kills


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 30, 2004 10:29 
Offline
User

Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 14:16
Posts: 109
Quote:
You can just imagine the future scenario. You have to put your driving licence into a reader before you use the car. Pay per mile tax (the card could store mileage information). GPS tracking, Speed cameras reading transponder information transmitted by the car...need I go on?


Please don't! Basingwerk will have to break out the tissues to clean his monitor if you do :lol:


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 31, 2004 01:20 
Offline
Suspended
Suspended

Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 22:27
Posts: 45
The people who want all these brave new world rules and regulations, are the same as soon get upset when they are applied to their driving.

You want liberal society, or harsh rules?

The easiest rules to catch you out on are driving regs, vote for harsh rules and get more of the same, if you are a parish priest like me who doesnt drive then you havent anything to lose whichever way it goes.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 31, 2004 01:47 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 23:09
Posts: 6737
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
speed kills wrote:
The easiest rules to catch you out on are driving regs, vote for harsh rules and get more of the same, if you are a parish priest like me who doesnt drive then you havent anything to lose whichever way it goes.

Thanks for confirmation of your total ignorance of the subject that you choose to pontificate about.

Parish Priest? Oh where's your Christian charity?

_________________
"Show me someone who says that they have never exceeded a speed limit, and I'll show you a liar, or a menace." (Austin Williams - Director, Transport Research Group)

Any views expressed in this post are personal opinions and may not represent the views of Safe Speed


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 01, 2004 01:03 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2004 15:43
Posts: 2416
speed kills wrote:
The people who want all these brave new world rules and regulations, are the same as soon get upset when they are applied to their driving.
You mean us? We're against them, end of story. What's wrong with being upset about it being inflicted on us?

On the other hand, if you're talking about locals demanding a speed camera which then goes on to ping most of the people who wanted it in the first place, you make a very good point. :twisted:

_________________
Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler - Einstein


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.011s | 12 Queries | GZIP : Off ]