Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Mon Feb 02, 2026 13:30

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 63 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 16:25 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 16:04
Posts: 816
BBC News

Quote:
Thousands of council staff are being trained to police the smoking ban in bars, restaurants and shops in England.

Ministers have given councils £29.5m to pay for staff, who will be able to give on-the-spot £50 fines to individuals and take court action against premises.

They will have the power to enter premises undercover, allowing them to sit among drinkers, and will even be able to photograph and film people.

Smokers' groups and industry officials said the plans were a "waste of money".

The smoking ban is due to come into force on 1 July. It covers virtually all enclosed public places including offices, factories, pubs and bars. But neither outdoor space nor private homes will be affected.


The idea of getting public officials to snoop on people is distasteful and disproportionate
Simon Clark,
Forest

Business owners also have a duty to ensure their customers comply - they are liable for £200 fines if proper signs are not displayed and, potentially, fines of £2,500 if they refuse to enforce the ban.

Local authorities have been given the power to enforce the ban so it does not consume police time.

A government-funded course is expected to train 1,200 council officers in the next few months with more expected to follow later.

Councils will use these fully-trained officers to brief other staff on how to enforce the law as many towns and cities will have scores of officers patrolling public places.

The teams will be made up of new staff and existing officers who will be freed up to carry out inspections and offer advice.

In London, there will be several hundred of the so-called anti-smoking police, with 40 in Westminster alone.

Two approaches

Ian Gray, policy officer for the Chartered Institute of Environmental Health and chief trainer for the government course, said he expected most councils would take a "softly, softly approach" at first.

"But there will be some occasions where action has to be taken and I am sure the compliance officers will not shy away from that," he added.

"These officers do not have to identify themselves when they go into premises and they can even film and photograph people to gather evidence although this may not be appropriate in many cases.

"There will be two ways of doing this, either staff can go in and identify themselves to the landlord, but they don't have to."


We want to make our presence felt from the start
Andy Hull,
Liverpool City Council

In Nottingham, there will be about 30 officers patrolling the city, composed of new staff and existing environmental health officers.

But the council is also exploring the possibility of getting street wardens, who currently aid the local police force, to help ensure the ban is effectively enforced.

Steve Dowling, director of environment and public protection at Nottingham City Council, said: "We have about 100 wardens and they could keep an eye on whether people are smoking in pubs as they go about their other duties.

"But it is not just about pubs and restaurants.

"We will also be looking at the likes of car garages and shops are complying as well."

'A sledgehammer'

In Liverpool, there will be a core team of about 20 to 25 staff keeping an eye on public places, although in the first few days after the start of the ban the council is planning to do a mass patrol of the city with 200 staff.


HAVE YOUR SAY
If only this money could be spent on having real police on our streets catching and deterring real criminals
Dan Hassett, Folkestone

Send us your comments

Liverpool City Council official Andy Hull said: "We want to make our presence felt from the start, and while we will probably just issue warnings on the first day, we won't be afraid of making an example of people or businesses if they try to make a stand."

And across Wales, where the smoking ban comes into force in April, 500 officers will be carrying out inspections after councils received just under £3m.

But Simon Clark, director of smokers' lobby group Forest, said: "The idea of getting public officials to snoop on people is distasteful and disproportionate.

"It is like taking a sledgehammer to crack a nut. Smokers will abide by the law so it will be a complete waste of public money."

And a spokesman for the British Beer and Pub Association added the approach was too "heavy-handed and elaborate", especially when the experience in Scotland, which has already introduced a ban, is considered.

"In Scotland, there have been just 11 fixed penalty notices issued to premises in the last 10 months, with many councils having issued none at all."


The HYS is quite lively too.

_________________
Prepare to be Judged


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 16:40 
Offline
User

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 12:33
Posts: 770
Location: Earith, Cambs
In his wildest dreams, Adolf Hitler could not have hoped for what's going on in 2007 Britain.
He wouldn't have needed the Gestapo, as the surveillance and petty laws enforced by local gov't officials would have covered everything he wanted. He could have labelled the Jews as 'terrorists' and used surveillance and tracking to control everyone's activities 100% of the time.
Private correspondence could have been monitored and new laws made to label anyone he wished as a criminal.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 17:22 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 00:45
Posts: 1016
Location: Mighty Tamworth
I do not smoke so this is not a great worry to me, HOWEVER I feel this is the tip of a very nasty ice burg. This now confirms to me we are living in a police state. It will only get worse. I am sure this activity must be illegal in the EU court of human rights?!. One also wonders what type of person would do this job. I suspect a petty minded (little man/woman) who love the tiny little bit of power they have. Perhaps PCSO rejects? I wonder what would the fine be if I was to shove the camera up their arse?

_________________
Oct 11 Birmingham Half Marathon. I am running for the British Heart Foundation.
http://www.justgiving.com/Rob-Taylor


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 17:32 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 14:06
Posts: 3654
Location: Oxfordshire
Covert video surveillance? Does that not require a court order?

Stroke of genius introducing the ban in the summer, when smokers will be perfectly happy to go outside for a tab, and won't kick up any fuss until the weather starts to turn inclement several months down the road. Manipulative buggers!

I hope they've only hired big burly guys as the inspectors. How do you think its gonna play out when some jumped-up little sh*t goes up to a group of drunk lads in the local pub who've just sparked up and tells them to put it out, waving his fine pad and camera at them; the evidence in court will likely look more like a colonoscopy! :lol:


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 17:37 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2005 08:22
Posts: 2618
Well, as a none-smoker, am I going to have the right to ask that my identy be disguised on the films they collect?

_________________
Science won over religion when they started installing lightning rods on churches.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 17:43 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 15:27
Posts: 683
Location: New Forest
I thought they had to decriminalise illegal parking before local authorities could go around fining people for that offence.

So how come civilians will be able to give out on-the-spot fines for the criminal activity of smoking in a public place? And who gets the money?

_________________
It's tricky doing nothing - you never know when you're finished


Last edited by Grumpy Old Biker on Thu Feb 15, 2007 17:45, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 17:44 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 00:45
Posts: 1016
Location: Mighty Tamworth
RobinXe wrote:

I hope they've only hired big burly guys as the inspectors. How do you think its gonna play out when some jumped-up little sh*t goes up to a group of drunk lads in the local pub who've just sparked up and tells them to put it out, waving his fine pad and camera at them; the evidence in court will likely look more like a colonoscopy! :lol:


They may need the police around late evening?
:scratchchin:

_________________
Oct 11 Birmingham Half Marathon. I am running for the British Heart Foundation.
http://www.justgiving.com/Rob-Taylor


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 19:02 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 16:37
Posts: 265
Grumpy Old Biker wrote:
I thought they had to decriminalise illegal parking before local authorities could go around fining people for that offence.

So how come civilians will be able to give out on-the-spot fines for the criminal activity of smoking in a public place? And who gets the money?


EHOs et al can already hand out FPNs for littering, fly tipping and the like.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 19:19 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:16
Posts: 7986
Location: Moved to London
Soon they'll be handing out fines for smoking in your own homes......


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 19:29 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 21:10
Posts: 1693
smeggy wrote:


A while back i predicted that smoking parents whose children have a history of respriritory illness will eventually be treated as child abusers (I believe that over 80% of under 5's admitted to hospital with chest problems have smoking parents so there is some justification in this)

Its later than you think!

(Mind you, speaking as a non-smoker, while I may be prepared to tolerate a smoky pub I do NOT see why I should have to tolerate other peoples smoke in the privicy of my own home! so I think the complainers have a point)

_________________
"The road to a police state is paved with public safety legislation"


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 19:33 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2004 14:47
Posts: 1659
Location: A Dark Desert Highway
Dusty wrote:
smeggy wrote:


A while back i predicted that smoking parents whose children have a history of respriritory illness will eventually be treated as child abusers (I believe that over 80% of under 5's admitted to hospital with chest problems have smoking parents so there is some justification in this)


I have often thought that smoking in the presence of young kids was borderline child abuse.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 19:37 
Offline
Camera Partnership Staff
Camera Partnership Staff
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2005 19:48
Posts: 1995
i for one will continue to smoke where and when i want, its perfectly healthy to do so, if they dont like me smoking then i would advise them to stop breathing

money making scheme to the core

_________________
now retired


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 19:43 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2004 14:47
Posts: 1659
Location: A Dark Desert Highway
ree.t wrote:
One also wonders what type of person would do this job. I suspect a petty minded (little man/woman) who love the tiny little bit of power they have. Perhaps PCSO rejects? I wonder what would the fine be if I was to shove the camera up their arse?


Well I'd do it for free and in my own time. Oh to dish out some revenge on smokers.

I like farting and one day I hope to be able to fart the national anthem, but I don't do it in public. If you want to smoke fine, just don't do it anywhere near me or anywhere I'm likely to go, ever.

It's not that long ago that I had to give to full Alex Ferguson hair dryer (fergie would be cowering in the corner after one of mine) to some prat that was alot bigger than me who thought it ws ok to smoke in my room at college. He soon found out how wrong he was.

A year or too before that I was asked by my then boss to give 2 casuals a lift home because it was on my. No problem. We'd finished for the (long) day and I wanted to go home. "I'm going now, so put your fag out and let's go". There were complaints about me not letting them smoke in MY car. Then feel free to walk was my response. Tossers.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 19:57 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 02:50
Posts: 2868
Location: Dorset
Sixy_the_red wrote:
Well, as a none-smoker, am I going to have the right to ask that my identy be disguised on the films they collect?

No no, you have nothing to worry about. They will only keep it for 30 years. Nobody other than the police (and anyone else they decide at a later date) will be able to view it. Auntie-terror purposes you understand. :roll:

camera operator wrote:
money making scheme to the core

:lol: It's not their only one. ;)

_________________
Andrew.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 19:58 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 14:26
Posts: 4364
Location: Hampshire/Wiltshire Border
RobinXe wrote:
How do you think its gonna play out when some jumped-up little sh*t goes up to a group of drunk lads in the local pub who've just sparked up and tells them to put it out, waving his fine pad and camera at them; the evidence in court will likely look more like a colonoscopy! :lol:


What will actually happen is analogous to speed cameras. The offence is filmed, reported and the landlord will get a fine in the post later. (Well, an oversimplification but ...)

You don't really think someone working for the council will actually approach anyone directly do you. Bad for Health and Safety.

_________________
Malcolm W.
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not represent the views of Safespeed.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 20:18 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 07:53
Posts: 460
Although a non-smoker I have absolutely no problem in people smoking. Ironic though isn't it? The Police cannot attend a burglary or deal with drug pushers through lack of resources yet Councils can find oodles of money to pay dickheads to go around pubs and video-tape people having a smoke and a pint. No doubt they will be fined for littering too. 1300 pubs closed alone last year, is this a backdoor alchohol ban too. WTF is happening to OUR country where you get put under surveillance for smoking a bloody cigarette whilst drug dealers are openly selling drugs in the Highstreet or Asda's car park. SICK!

ps, Andy Hull, you are a prat!!!


Last edited by wayneo on Thu Feb 15, 2007 20:45, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 20:27 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 15:30
Posts: 643
camera operator wrote:
i for one will continue to smoke where and when i want, its perfectly healthy to do so, if they dont like me smoking then i would advise them to stop breathing

money making scheme to the core


'They' will have 'safety' cameras to stop you :D

Smoking actually does kill after all!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 21:02 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 00:04
Posts: 2311
smeggy wrote:


in this case I have to agree with them. In one of my previous flats we couldn't open the lounge or bedroom windows in summer because the people downstairs were chain smokers (or at least seemed to be) and always had theirs open so the smoke would come straight into our place. If nothing else, I can do without the hassle of explaining to a landlord why my walls are stained by cigarette smoke when I've signed a lease saying I'm a non-smoker!


Last edited by johnsher on Thu Feb 15, 2007 21:02, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 21:02 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 00:11
Posts: 764
Location: Sofa
camera operator wrote:
i for one will continue to smoke where and when i want, its perfectly healthy to do so, if they dont like me smoking then i would advise them to stop breathing

money making scheme to the core
Now, now cam-op. Defiance of the law is not on. If you don't like the law you should campaign to change it. :wink:

_________________
Less Kodak, more Kojak.
In times of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 22:26 
Offline
Camera Partnership Staff
Camera Partnership Staff
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2005 19:48
Posts: 1995
semitone wrote:
camera operator wrote:
i for one will continue to smoke where and when i want, its perfectly healthy to do so, if they dont like me smoking then i would advise them to stop breathing

money making scheme to the core



Smoking actually does kill after all!


rubbish they say about cancer and the like, everyone has cancer cells it takes something to trigger them off

Quote:
MrsMiggins

Now, now cam-op. Defiance of the law is not on. If you don't like the law you should campaign to change it. Wink


whats the website ???

its not a law in the criminal aspect its a ban in a civil aspect

_________________
now retired


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 63 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.347s | 13 Queries | GZIP : Off ]