Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Mon Nov 10, 2025 09:18

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu May 03, 2007 10:12 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 09:16
Posts: 3655
http://www.edie.net/news/news_story.asp?id=12971&channel=0
Quote:
Tower Bridge commuters exhaust emissions to be tested as 'Accuscan' comes to town (2 May 2007)

On May 15th 2007, air quality monitoring specialists - Enviro Technology - will be demonstrating the abilities of the Accuscan 4600 remote sensing device on vehicles passing by Tower Bridge, City of London.

This demonstration is the first of a number of Accuscan events taking place in 2007. The event comes hot on the heels of a number of successful demonstrations, and customer-led data surveys, which took place in 2007.

Professionals from London borough councils will be able to actively see the device in action, while getting a real-time taster of the level of harmful exhaust emissions being pumped into the city's air by both large and small vehicles.

The Accuscan 4600 can test up to 4,000 vehicles per hour and will operational from 08.30 - 15.30 on Tuesday 15th May.

In 2005 Enviro Technology was appointed as the sole UK distributor for Tucson, USA, based Environmental Systems Products (ESP) the worlds premier vehicle inspection company and manufacturers of the Accuscan 4600.

Says Duncan Mounsor, Enviro Technology Operations Director: "Our UK Accuscan demonstrations went so well throughout 2006 that, this year, we are inviting many more people to our London event.

"Having worked with local authorities on vehicle emissions surveys in 2007, we are now even better placed to advise potential users on the merits of using the equipment for vehicle emission testing."

The Accuscan 4600 works by measuring tailpipe emissions as motor vehicles pass through ultraviolet and infrared beams stationed at either side of the road.

"Remote sensing devices (RSDs) are the worlds fastest and most convenient form of motor vehicle emissions testing.

"The Accuscan 4600 provides a simple diagnostic solution for the ever present vehicle emissions pollution problem affecting our major UK cities. With its ability to monitor thousands of vehicles in a day and provide reliable information as to emissions, the Accuscan 4600 really is the only option for those cities looking to research and, if needed, implement low emissions zones."

The Accuscan 4600 measures vehicles for the emission of Nitrogen Oxides (NOx), Carbon Monoxide (CO), Carbon Dioxide (CO2), Hydrocarbons (HC) and the 'smoke factor' - a measurement technique specifically developed for assessing particulate emissions from diesel vehicles.

The system also records the speed and acceleration of the vehicle. All the data is referenced to an image of the registration plate which has been captured by a high speed camera, thus allowing the identification of polluting vehicles.

"Several major UK cities are interested in setting up low emissions zones and this kind of technology simplifies the screening of clean and grossly polluting vehicles without having to stop the vehicles to conduct the test - or having to involve third parties such as the police," adds Duncan.

Representatives from ESP and Enviro Technology will be on hand during the day to discuss how the Accuscan 4600 can help environmental professionals with regard to Air Quality Management areas.

For further information on the Accuscan 4600 London Wall Demonstration please contact Jackie Yarnham or email Jackie.yarnham@et.co.uk



Looks like in the future we will get fixed penalty fines whe you drive past a polution camera.... :x

_________________
Speed camera policy Kills


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 03, 2007 10:31 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
Quote:
The Accuscan 4600 works by measuring tailpipe emissions as motor vehicles pass through ultraviolet and infrared beams stationed at either side of the road.
[...]

The Accuscan 4600 measures vehicles for the emission of Nitrogen Oxides (NOx), Carbon Monoxide (CO), Carbon Dioxide (CO2), Hydrocarbons (HC) and the 'smoke factor' - a measurement technique specifically developed for assessing particulate emissions from diesel vehicles.


Is this a joke? Or a con trick?

Even if what they are claiming is technically possible - which I doubt - the most they could possibly measure is 'highest concentration' of those gasses. And you can defeat such a measurement in a flash by adding air to the exhaust gasses.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 03, 2007 10:40 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:16
Posts: 7986
Location: Moved to London
http://www.et.co.uk/cgi-bin/press.cgi?s ... 00&ID=2039


Here it is:

Image

_________________
Views expressed are personal opinions and are not necessarily shared by the Safe Speed campaign


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 03, 2007 11:03 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 16:04
Posts: 816
I fit's used in London then you can probably get good odds on all the public transport vehicles being fined :wink:

_________________
Prepare to be Judged


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 03, 2007 11:15 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 09:16
Posts: 3655
R1Nut wrote:
I fit's used in London then you can probably get good odds on all the public transport vehicles being fined :wink:


They will probably be exempt.

Since it requires your tail pipe to cross the beam I wonder how they catch trucks with "smoke stacks"

Sound like we could see the old custom style side pipes making a comeback.... :lol:

Image

_________________
Speed camera policy Kills


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 03, 2007 14:09 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 16:37
Posts: 265
SafeSpeed wrote:
And you can defeat such a measurement in a flash by adding air to the exhaust gasses.


Strangely, exactly how manufacturers got round the early more-stringent emissions restrictions California. CA spec. cars had an engine driven air pump that was used to dilute the %age of noxious fumes in the exhaust.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 03, 2007 16:00 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 02:50
Posts: 2868
Location: Dorset
patdavies wrote:
Strangely, exactly how manufacturers got round the early more-stringent emissions restrictions California. CA spec. cars had an engine driven air pump that was used to dilute the %age of noxious fumes in the exhaust.

Thus using more energy and more fuel. :roll:

How about temporarily turning off the exhaust pipe, redirecting it into an inflatable chamber?

Another thing to do would be to rev the engine hard before you get to the monitoring site... Right?
And get up speed and cruise along past it. With the engine off?

Hmm it's not illegal to have UV lights on your car, is it?

Yes, I do so like to "beat the system". :lol:

_________________
Andrew.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 03, 2007 18:51 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 04:10
Posts: 3244
http://freepatentsonline.com/5210702.html


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 03, 2007 19:28 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member

Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 10:26
Posts: 194
Location: Burton on Trent
I thought the MOT test did this ? So why have yet another big brother monitoring system ? Note nobody seems to be putting it into operation.

:) Richard


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 03, 2007 23:00 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
[cynical mode ]Another cash con trick - declare an area as requiring special measures to reduce polution ( think of the kids /listed buildings, any other dubious excuse ) declare it as an area of low pollution , add camera and hey presto - another revenue scheme. [/cynical mode]

_________________
lets bring sanity back to speed limits.
Drivers are like donkeys -they respond best to a carrot, not a stick .Road safety experts are like Asses - best kept covered up ,or sat on


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 06, 2007 00:49 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 18:54
Posts: 4036
Location: Cumbria
patdavies wrote:
Strangely, exactly how manufacturers got round the early more-stringent emissions restrictions California. CA spec. cars had an engine driven air pump that was used to dilute the %age of noxious fumes in the exhaust.


I'm not sure that was its purpose - I thought it was to provide extra oxygen to help the catalyst complete the oxidation of CO to CO2 and to burn off a few more unburned hydrocarbons? They had them over here for a while I think, in the mid 1990s.

That aside, how on earth do these pollution cameras cope with a windy day or some other source of pollutant nearby? We already have cases of speed cameras being triggered by spurious inputs. How on earth are they going to prove "beyond reasonable doubt" that it was MY exhaust that triggered it or even that my exhaust was just within the limit but was tipped over the edge by the tungboat passing under the bridge at the time?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 06, 2007 02:16 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
Mole wrote:
That aside, how on earth do these pollution cameras cope with a windy day or some other source of pollutant nearby? We already have cases of speed cameras being triggered by spurious inputs. How on earth are they going to prove "beyond reasonable doubt" that it was MY exhaust that triggered it or even that my exhaust was just within the limit but was tipped over the edge by the tungboat passing under the bridge at the time?


Absolutely. It's BS.

Perhaps it may one day be used as a crude 'screening' test to trigger an evidential test?

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 06, 2007 13:34 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 15:00
Posts: 1109
Location: Can't see.
SafeSpeed wrote:
Mole wrote:
That aside, how on earth do these pollution cameras cope with a windy day or some other source of pollutant nearby? We already have cases of speed cameras being triggered by spurious inputs. How on earth are they going to prove "beyond reasonable doubt" that it was MY exhaust that triggered it or even that my exhaust was just within the limit but was tipped over the edge by the tungboat passing under the bridge at the time?


Absolutely. It's BS.

Perhaps it may one day be used as a crude 'screening' test to trigger an evidential test?


bit like TV detector vans with their "really good top secret" equipment who bang on the doors of people who have no telly?

_________________
Fear is a weapon of mass distraction


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 11, 2007 13:25 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 16:34
Posts: 4923
Location: Somewhere between a rock and a hard place
Maybe they're also working one that detects methane, to catch cyclists? :-)

_________________
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not necessarily represent the views of Safe Speed.
You will be branded a threat to society by going over a speed limit where it is safe to do so, and suffer the consequences of your actions in a way criminals do not, more so than someone who is a real threat to our society.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.020s | 12 Queries | GZIP : Off ]