Safe Speed Forums

So, they did it again.
They protected their interests rather than that of the public.
Just another tier of denial and interpretation, twisting of the right to silence as they see fit.

Whats next?
Where do we go from here?
My own ideas on what to do cant be printed here due to snooping by "them", needless to say it dosent involve engaging them in idle chit chat any longer as im of the opinion that that avenue is well and truly closed, talked out if you will.

Is there an appeal process?
Can we buy off some judges?
Or snap them in a compromising position with a ferret a strap-on and a couple of bangkok ladyboys perhaps?

Im all ears, but i think the last ideas a winner.......

_________________
"Safety" Scamera Partnerships;
Profitting from death and misery since 1993.

Believe nothing- Question everything.

just insist on being subject to English Law, you know the one that allows the right to silence, Innocent till........, the one our forebears died to keep for us? etc etc

Mr Prescott - unfortunately, you and your boss, one T BLAIR, sold that right to the EEC for a mess of pottage - so we no longer have that right.

_________________
lets bring sanity back to speed limits.
Drivers are like donkeys -they respond best to a carrot, not a stick .Road safety experts are like Asses - best kept covered up ,or sat on

Personally I don't think that it's a case of "Party lines" Botach. The European constitution on paper sounds better than our vaguely held "Great Charter" of 1215.........

The trouble; is well described, within Deltafs first three lines of his post.......

Both systems are......... corrupt!




Oh, and Deltaf ............ When driving, always wear a wig, large sunglasses and a false moustache. (high heels are optional)....


After all (it's not illegal).......... and your car which has NO distinguishing marks must have been "cloned". And anyway "I" was with you at the time, wasn't I? Somewhere else