Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Fri May 01, 2026 10:19

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 09:52 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 22:02
Posts: 3266
http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/ ... ive_secret

Quote:
AN ambulance driver carried on taking patients on emergency calls despite being banned for drink driving.

Mark Smith, 44, hid his conviction from bosses and continued working for more than a month.

Smith, from Tangmere Avenue, Heywood, near Rochdale, worked as an ambulance medical technician in Manchester city centre.

He was eventually caught when police alerted health chiefs.

He has now been sacked from his job with the North West Ambulance Service.

Police officers stopped Smith as he was driving a BMW in Middleton, Rochdale, in November.

He was off duty at the time. He was given a 16-month ban on December 7 but carried on working as if it had never happened.

His bosses at the North West Ambulance Service eventually found out earlier this month and called him to a disciplinary hearing. A spokesman for NWAS said: "The member of staff concerned failed to notify the trust of the conviction.

"As soon as the trust was informed, appropriate action was taken and the individual was suspended from duties.

"The individual was dismissed by the trust following a disciplinary hearing." The court heard Smith had 70mm of alcohol in 100ml of breath when he was tested by police in Middleton. The limit is 35.

He was also offered the chance of reducing his ban by four months if he completed a rehabilitation course. It is understood NWAS learned of Smith's conviction after being notified formally by police.

NWAS does not have a policy of automatically firing employees who are banned from driving but considers each case on an individual basis.

Ambulance technicians help paramedics to assess and care for patients at the scene of an emergency and on the way to hospital.

They usually have about 14 weeks of advanced driving and medical training.

Smith declined to comment when he was approached at his home.


_________________
Speed limit sign radio interview. TV Snap Unhappy
“It has never been the rule in this country – I hope it never will be - that suspected criminal offences must automatically be the subject of prosecution” He added that there should be a prosecution: “wherever it appears that the offence or the circumstances of its commission is or are of such a character that a prosecution in respect thereof is required in the public interest”
This approach has been endorsed by Attorney General ever since 1951. CPS Code


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 13:04 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 13:54
Posts: 1711
Location: NW Kent
I do not of course condone driving while affected by alcohol however as a discussion point-

How likely is it that this chap would nip down to the pub for a few pints while out in an ambulance?

Does being caught on his own time show a predilection to driving while under the influence? I am thinking morning after or a few jars at lunchtime?

Could there be a case to allow such a driver to remain driving professionally but not privately? Daily breath tests, evaluation for alcohol addiction? I am thinking of the cost of the drivers training which is lost.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.082s | 13 Queries | GZIP : Off ]