Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Sun Jul 26, 2026 07:40

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 52 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Chelsea Tractors ?
PostPosted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 08:35 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 04:10
Posts: 3244
AGAIN, KEN ?

_________________
The world runs on oil, period. No other substance can compete when it comes to energy density, flexibility, ease of handling, ease of transportation. If oil didn’t exist we would have to invent it.”

56 years after it was decided it was needed, the Bedford Bypass is nearing completion. The last single carriageway length of it.We have the most photogenic mayor though, always being photographed doing nothing


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Chelsea Tractors ?
PostPosted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 09:31 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 23:09
Posts: 6737
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
jomukuk wrote:

Old news, surely - he's just announcing the (predictable) results of the consultation today.

And expect the CC exemption for vehicles emitting under 120 g/km CO2 to be dropped, given that a growing number of models including a BMW 318d now come into this category.

_________________
"Show me someone who says that they have never exceeded a speed limit, and I'll show you a liar, or a menace." (Austin Williams - Director, Transport Research Group)

Any views expressed in this post are personal opinions and may not represent the views of Safe Speed


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 09:38 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 14:26
Posts: 4364
Location: Hampshire/Wiltshire Border
Anything over 226g/Km is to be charged £25 - not just 4x4s. A very misleading article.

Thank goodness my 4x4 is rated at 216g/Km (although, of course, I never actually go to London). What a pointless bit of "class warfare".

_________________
Malcolm W.
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not represent the views of Safespeed.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 12:03 
Offline
Banned
Banned

Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2007 12:27
Posts: 301
malcolmw wrote:
What a pointless bit of "class warfare".


Yes, pointless class warfare - it’s the end of another part of traditional British life. I’ll miss the chavs in London in their second-hand black 4x4s with smoke billowing out the back. Soon, the only ones there will be middle class toffs like me in small French cars. It’s not right, I tell you!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 19:47 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2004 14:47
Posts: 1659
Location: A Dark Desert Highway
what does it cost to take a real tractor into London? I'd love to spend the day driving around London on an 18.1 litre, 600hp Challanger MTB865 (especially if it is exept)!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 19:57 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 00:01
Posts: 2258
Location: South Wales
Valle Crucis wrote:
malcolmw wrote:
What a pointless bit of "class warfare".


Yes, pointless class warfare - it’s the end of another part of traditional British life. I’ll miss the chavs in London in their second-hand black 4x4s with smoke billowing out the back. Soon, the only ones there will be middle class toffs like me in small French cars. It’s not right, I tell you!


Well, you wont miss the BMW X5. That thing puts out less CO2 than the new limit. What you will miss is the 2.0 automatic VW Golf, and the older Ford Mondeos.

This only applies to cars for which a CO2 figure is available, right? so expect an increase in older less efficient 4x4s as well as grey imports with no CO2 figure (Mitsubishi Pajero anyone)

The positive aspect of this (and the new Band G) for some people is that 1999 and 2000 cars of certain makes are going to depreciate more slowly than 2001 cars now :)


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 20:50 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 23:09
Posts: 6737
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
Lum wrote:
This only applies to cars for which a CO2 figure is available, right? so expect an increase in older less efficient 4x4s as well as grey imports with no CO2 figure (Mitsubishi Pajero anyone)

The positive aspect of this (and the new Band G) for some people is that 1999 and 2000 cars of certain makes are going to depreciate more slowly than 2001 cars now :)

For older cars or ones for which no CO2 figure is available the higher charge will apply to those with an engine over 3000 cc.

_________________
"Show me someone who says that they have never exceeded a speed limit, and I'll show you a liar, or a menace." (Austin Williams - Director, Transport Research Group)

Any views expressed in this post are personal opinions and may not represent the views of Safe Speed


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 21:00 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 00:01
Posts: 2258
Location: South Wales
adam.L wrote:
what does it cost to take a real tractor into London? I'd love to spend the day driving around London on an 18.1 litre, 600hp Challanger MTB865 (especially if it is exept)!


Can you convert it to run on vegetable oil? Then it should count as an "alternative fuel vehicle" and be exempt.

Actually that's something I would love to do if I had the time, make the biggest, most obnoxious, most polluting alternative fuel vehicle possible, paint it up with anti-Ken slogans and drive it around London all day causing traffic jams.

Something like an LPG or kerosene Hummer, or a rigid flatbed with a highly visible industrial 3-phase AC motor filling the air with ozone and running off multiple banks of environment killing lead-acid batteries with DC-AC converters just to make it even more inefficient, maybe with a 30 year old diesel generator on there (exempt from modern emissions laws) charging the batteries and pumping thick black smoke into the air, all exempt from the Con Charge.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 21:22 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
Lum wrote:


Actually that's something I would love to do if I had the time, make the biggest, most obnoxious, most polluting alternative fuel vehicle possible, and drive it around London all day causing traffic jams.

--- exempt from the Con Charge.


Already been done ---
Image


:twisted: :evil:

_________________
lets bring sanity back to speed limits.
Drivers are like donkeys -they respond best to a carrot, not a stick .Road safety experts are like Asses - best kept covered up ,or sat on


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 21:23 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 00:45
Posts: 1016
Location: Mighty Tamworth
Lum wrote:
adam.L wrote:
what does it cost to take a real tractor into London? I'd love to spend the day driving around London on an 18.1 litre, 600hp Challanger MTB865 (especially if it is exept)!


Can you convert it to run on vegetable oil? Then it should count as an "alternative fuel vehicle" and be exempt.

Actually that's something I would love to do if I had the time, make the biggest, most obnoxious, most polluting alternative fuel vehicle possible, paint it up with anti-Ken slogans and drive it around London all day causing traffic jams.

Something like an LPG or kerosene Hummer, or a rigid flatbed with a highly visible industrial 3-phase AC motor filling the air with ozone and running off multiple banks of environment killing lead-acid batteries with DC-AC converters just to make it even more inefficient, maybe with a 30 year old diesel generator on there (exempt from modern emissions laws) charging the batteries and pumping thick black smoke into the air, all exempt from the Con Charge.


:bunker: :D Well at least it will get you out of the house :D
:D :D Which is something you clearly need to do :twisted: :D :D :bunker:

_________________
Oct 11 Birmingham Half Marathon. I am running for the British Heart Foundation.
http://www.justgiving.com/Rob-Taylor


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 21:31 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
Lum wrote:

Something like an LPG or kerosene Hummer, or a rigid flatbed with a highly visible industrial 3-phase AC motor filling the air with ozone and running off multiple banks of environment killing lead-acid batteries with DC-AC converters just to make it even more inefficient, maybe with a 30 year old diesel generator on there (exempt from modern emissions laws) charging the batteries and pumping thick black smoke into the air, all exempt from the Con Charge.



Why not use the bus , and to get right up the PC brigade's noses - fill it full of smokers

_________________
lets bring sanity back to speed limits.
Drivers are like donkeys -they respond best to a carrot, not a stick .Road safety experts are like Asses - best kept covered up ,or sat on


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 21:35 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 00:01
Posts: 2258
Location: South Wales
botach wrote:
Why not use the bus , and to get right up the PC brigade's noses - fill it full of smokers


Surely if using an old London bus (and I like the point of them being annoying and polluting and exempt from the con charge) then the best option would be to fit a tow bar and tow a second London bus on an A frame (otherwise the bendy bus still wins the award for causing the most congestion). Bonus points if you wear a chaffeurs uniform and carry a single passenger.


Alternatively, if you want to piss people off with an annoying slow alternative fuel vehicle, perhaps one of those land yachts with an electric fan styled after a wind turbine would be more appropriate. Can you Q-plate a wind powered vehicle?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 12:02 
Offline
Banned
Banned

Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2007 12:27
Posts: 301
Lum wrote:
Well, you wont miss the BMW X5. That thing puts out less CO2 than the new limit.


Ken will have noticed that the law worked even before it came into effect. Germans steal market share from dinosaur car makers by adapting to change and downsizing their emissions – what a novel idea, eh? Everything seems to be clicking into place nicely.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 12:50 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 22:02
Posts: 3266
I can't wait to see all the Chelsea flower exhibitors get stung £200 a day for thier old lorries and £25 a day for each big van.

_________________
Speed limit sign radio interview. TV Snap Unhappy
“It has never been the rule in this country – I hope it never will be - that suspected criminal offences must automatically be the subject of prosecution” He added that there should be a prosecution: “wherever it appears that the offence or the circumstances of its commission is or are of such a character that a prosecution in respect thereof is required in the public interest”
This approach has been endorsed by Attorney General ever since 1951. CPS Code


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 13:36 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2005 19:50
Posts: 3369
Location: Lost in the Wilderness
I wonder how they’ll go on when they start building the Olympics, all those machines churning out all that pollution, not to mention all the transport that’ll be used to ferry in all the equipment.

_________________
Useless laws weaken necessary laws.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 13:37 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2005 08:22
Posts: 2618
anton wrote:
I can't wait to see all the Chelsea flower exhibitors get stung £200 a day for thier old lorries and £25 a day for each big van.


There are already a signifitant number of smaller hauliers refusing to go into London now because of the LEZ charging. At least they saw sense and have given a longer time-frame before they start charging Euro3 vehicles...

_________________
Science won over religion when they started installing lightning rods on churches.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 15:32 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 04:10
Posts: 3244
Quote:
The punitive £25 charge applies to pre-2001 cars and long-cab pickups with three-litre engines or bigger, or to modern makes which emit more than 225 g/km of CO2.

_________________
The world runs on oil, period. No other substance can compete when it comes to energy density, flexibility, ease of handling, ease of transportation. If oil didn’t exist we would have to invent it.”

56 years after it was decided it was needed, the Bedford Bypass is nearing completion. The last single carriageway length of it.We have the most photogenic mayor though, always being photographed doing nothing


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 17:27 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 02:50
Posts: 2868
Location: Dorset
Sixy_the_red wrote:
There are already a signifitant number of smaller hauliers refusing to go into London now because of the LEZ charging. At least they saw sense and have given a longer time-frame before they start charging Euro3 vehicles...

Good! Why aren't the bigger ones doing it as well?
It's just not worth risking a journey to london.

LEZ... Legalised Extortion Zone?

_________________
Andrew.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 17:36 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 23:09
Posts: 6737
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
Ziltro wrote:
Sixy_the_red wrote:
There are already a signifitant number of smaller hauliers refusing to go into London now because of the LEZ charging. At least they saw sense and have given a longer time-frame before they start charging Euro3 vehicles...

Good! Why aren't the bigger ones doing it as well?

Presumably the bigger ones are more likely to have newer vehicles that comply with the LEZ regulations.

_________________
"Show me someone who says that they have never exceeded a speed limit, and I'll show you a liar, or a menace." (Austin Williams - Director, Transport Research Group)

Any views expressed in this post are personal opinions and may not represent the views of Safe Speed


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 17:43 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 02:50
Posts: 2868
Location: Dorset
PeterE wrote:
Presumably the bigger ones are more likely to have newer vehicles that comply with the LEZ regulations.

Until the law changes to include them...

_________________
Andrew.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 52 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 144 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.107s | 12 Queries | GZIP : Off ]