dcbwhaley wrote:
If towns without cars are what some people want then let them have them. No one is forcing car lovers to live there.
I am sure that (to begin with) they will be fine. The first residents will likly be better than averagly well off people with high ideals and nice IT type jobs that will allow them to tele-comute.
Where it will all start to go horribly wrong is when these IT types lose their jobs and find that, in order to make a living, they need to actually go somewhere in person and actually do something physically productive.
Even worse (especially if they DO end up being used by retired people) is the prospect that the pepole who end up living there may become ill and requre hospital out patient treatment. (I dont know about the other "Eco-Ghettos" but I would guess that the nearest DGH to whitehill is liky to be 20 miles away! and not on a direct route eitther)
Having done the "Chemo Run" myself when my dad was ill I have to conclude that making such trips on a bus is
not possible! (And before anybody points out that there are those that do have to make such journeys on PT, I strongly suspect that those who do end up with a significantly poorer life expectancy compared to those with access to a private car)
20 years down the line I would imagine that either the "Car Free" aspects of the developments will have been abbandonned, or they will be like Easterhouse! (Or Both!)