Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Wed Jun 03, 2026 15:05

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Toyota Prius/ hybrids
PostPosted: Tue Apr 05, 2005 21:29 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2004 14:47
Posts: 1659
Location: A Dark Desert Highway
Could some one enlighten me about hybrids. Ok you have a normal petrol engine and an electric motor. The petrol engine drives a generator that charges the batteries or drives the motor. On down hills the energy from the drive wheels can be used to charge the batteries. It's all great, gives low emissions and will save the world or something.

But I don't understand. Is the engine any more effecient than the engine in the equivalent Corolla for example, ie grammes of fuel used per KW/hr? It has to as the only scource of power is the petrol engine, if so why bother with the electric motor bit? If the batteries go flat the only way to charge them is by running the engine.

If one drives one of these things in the normal manner, will one see much difference in fuel consumption? I wager it would be no better than my car, because it will still need the same amount of energy that my car does to move along at a given speed.

Am I missing something here?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 05, 2005 21:45 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 09:59
Posts: 3544
Location: Shropshire
Well the amount of fuel consumed by a petrol engine is related to the load placed upon it as well as the speed at which it is run.
Driving a generator to charge batteries places less load on the engine than driving the transmission, thus less fuel consumed I presume.
And don't the two engines share the load? A petrol engine aided by batteries is going to consume less fuel than one driving the vehicle on its own.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 05, 2005 22:26 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2004 13:36
Posts: 1339
All the energy originally comes from the petrol, but there is an advantage because less energy is wasted when braking or coasting downhill. Magnets on the wheels turn some of the kinetic energy into electricity instead of dumping it as heat. The electricity can then be used to assist the engine with an electric motor, saving fuel.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 05, 2005 22:43 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
Lightly loaded engines are far less efficient because of friction losses within the engine itself. Remember how stiff an engine is to turn over? But with a high output the friction losses remain the same and the efficiency rises considerably.

So the name of the hybrid game is to try to keep the petrol engine running at high loads where it's at its most efficient.

However an awful lot of energy goes into making (fairly) short-life batteries, not to mention the motor, drive arrangements, controls, and finally battery maintenance and disposal.

I wouldn't be surprised to hear that the life time energy budget of a hybrid is worse than a typical small diesel.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 05, 2005 22:49 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 09:16
Posts: 3655
The increase in fuel efficiency is not substantial compared to the complexity and cost. Hybrids have a very short shelf life in the evolution of so called "green" energy. You are better of with a diesel.

here is some infor anyway..http://www.howstuffworks.com/hybrid-car9.htm

I would NEVER consider getting one. The maintanance costs further down the line will be horrendous.

_________________
Speed camera policy Kills


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 06, 2005 10:53 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 13:55
Posts: 2247
Location: middlish
hybrids are definitely (only) a stepping stone to full electric, but full electric needs a power source such as hydrogen based fuel cell which have their own problems.. and in my opinion are at least 15years from series production.

currently available hybrid models are all parallel configuration rather than series as far as i'm aware. there's a good description here:
http://people.bath.ac.uk/en1wros/Electric.htm


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 06, 2005 12:38 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2004 10:42
Posts: 77
Location: Rutland
Quote:
Is it the most self-indulgent car ever built, or the least?
What happens when you add hybrid technology to one of America's best-loved vehicles? You get performance and fuel efficiency in a very stylish and dependable package. The revolutionary new Accord Hybrid is a 255-hp, V-6 rocket that gives you more low-end torque with increased fuel economy. We're talking 37 mpg highway, 29 mpg city*. Plus, you get it all in the same safety-conscious and luxurious package you expect from the Accord family of vehicles. So indulge yourself with the most powerful, most fuel-efficient Accord ever made.


Am I missing something regarding fuel consumption figures? I know the US gallon is different but.... :shock:

_________________
Tailgaters - Please Pass
You have an Accident to go to!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 06, 2005 12:41 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 09:16
Posts: 3655
Max Wilson wrote:
Am I missing something regarding fuel consumption figures? I know the US gallon is different but.... :shock:


At $2 per US gallon would you be bothered about fuel consumption.

What they don't say in the Hybrid hype is most of the 100,000 or so cars that have been sold to date have been to US and Japanese Government organisations. I assume driven by political correctness rather than market forces.

_________________
Speed camera policy Kills


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: US Imperial
PostPosted: Wed Apr 06, 2005 12:49 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2004 10:42
Posts: 77
Location: Rutland
Just did the conversion to imperial and 37miles per US gallon = 44.43 miles per Imperial Gallon and 29 US = 34 UK.

Ok it's better, but nothing to write home about. The reason the Accord interested me is because I've got one; I would expect not much worse from mine.

Max

_________________
Tailgaters - Please Pass
You have an Accident to go to!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: US Imperial
PostPosted: Wed Apr 06, 2005 12:55 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 09:16
Posts: 3655
Max Wilson wrote:
I would expect not much worse from mine.
Max


But does it have 255hp?

_________________
Speed camera policy Kills


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 06, 2005 20:51 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
And the UK forgets "DUALFUEL" CARS such as the ASTRA/VECTRA.


tut , tut , mr brown


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 06, 2005 21:06 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 09:16
Posts: 3655
botach wrote:
And the UK forgets "DUALFUEL" CARS such as the ASTRA/VECTRA.


Thank goodness!

Bet you won't see John Prescot driving one.

_________________
Speed camera policy Kills


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 06, 2005 21:24 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
He takes tablets for gas, don't seem to work though :twisted:


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 07, 2005 13:21 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 22:34
Posts: 603
Location: West Scotland
Quote:
Gizmo wrote: At $2 per US gallon would you be bothered about fuel consumption.


The Americans are fuming about it, their used to $1 a gallon. I say to any disgruntled American 'come to Britain and see how lucky you really are' (if you can bear to stay long enough) And i'm not just talking about your fuel prices....just about everything else as well.


Regards


Andrew

_________________
It's a scam........or possibly a scamola


Homer Simpson


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 07, 2005 13:40 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 09:16
Posts: 3655
New on the Prius.

Not exactly the most popular car sold in the UK.

it represents 0.13% of car sales here.

http://www.carkeys.co.uk/news/2005/april/07/5877.asp

_________________
Speed camera policy Kills


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.030s | 13 Queries | GZIP : Off ]