Suspect Palin's agent signed him up for this.
But ... if these people should not need a celeb to endorse their opinion: their "facts" should speak for themselves!
As for the programme ... my wife Wildy

is an avid fan - as most of our female relatives.
As for the list of complaints....
1. Perhaps they found very little evidence to justify the closure iof the Oxford High Street - hence two filmings to try to show "the other side of the coin" and they were scraping the barrel at bit by all accounts.
2. Clarkson was up against Mombiot on Vine's R2 prog regarding the 4X4 test. He used a track and did not drive willy nilly up and down the mountain. Mombiot drew derogatory comment from most listeners that day.
3. The police stop for speeding could have been contrived for entertainment value. He was being followed by a BBC film crew after all - so if he was speeding outragepously - then so too was the whole film crew in their follow-up cars, It could have been edited out in any case. Hence my suspicion it had more to do with entertainment and a warning to UK drivers that you do get fined on the spot if you speed on the continent. Thus -
education as to what happens when you speed!"
4. Given that most of T2k's claims are from the same rather dubious spun sources as the normal propaganda - not surprising he gave it the treatment it deserves. How on earth Cambs, for example, could justify a claim that over 400 people were injured on the ring road on one date over a consecutive three year period beggars belief. An injury toll of over 100 on one road constitutes a serious "red alert" in A&E and this would have been newsorthy on anational scale. But - did not happen as each member of one large family were travelling on that road on the dates in question and were not held up at all! Nor were any doctors present at the party recalled to deal with this highly serious level of injury.
Bit like the 3 recent "incidents" at Ings - that no one apart from CSPC has heard of...
