Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Mon Jul 27, 2026 08:14

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Feb 01, 2011 20:14 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 02:17
Posts: 7357
Location: Highlands
Jalopnik here
Quote:
Video Gamers More Dangerous Drivers Than Non-Gamers

A new study's discovered players of racing video games like Need For Speed take bigger risks, are ticketed, and crash into stationary objects more often then their non-gamer counterparts. But frequent gamers do pass driving tests in fewer attempts.

The study on gamers and driving was put together by Continental Tires, who quizzed 2,000 motorists (half gamers, half non-gamers) between the ages of 17 and 39 on their driving habits. Though gamers believe they're more skilled drivers, they admit to taking higher risks and making more claims on their insurance.

"It seems that while gamers develop useful skills and are more confident, they need to apply some balance with a sensible assessment of risk," said Continental's Tim Bailey.

Results showed 22% of gamers reported being stopped by police, as compared to 13% of non-gamers. Those who frequently play racing games also are twice as likely to make a claim for an accident with their insurance, have road rage, and run a red light.

In defense of gamers, they thought they were being chased by Cuban drug dealers and only had 12 seconds to hit the next checkpoint.

Inversely, non-gamers were twice as likely to dent their vehicle and required, on average, one more attempt to pass the British driving exam. The producers of the study then tried to tie this into drivers not understanding the consequences of their actions and quoted someone from the "Institute of Advanced Motorists" on the topic.

"I am not surprised that regular gamers find themselves making the same decisions and judgements when driving for real as they do when in the virtual world," said Peter Rodger. "The issue is that when actually driving, our actions lead to 'real' results, and mistakes have very real consequences."

Couldn't the same be said for non game-playing drivers, who have never witnessed their pride-and-joy crushed in a game with advanced crash rendering? It's a big leap for what is just a self-reported study.

Here are the full results:

COMPARISON OF THOSE WHO DO AND DON'T PLAY DRIVING COMPUTER GAMES
DO DON'T
% stopped by police 22 13
% who use mobile when driving 19 12
% ever made a claim for an accident 30 15
% run a red light in last 12mnths 31 14
% driven wrong way down 1-way street 13 10
% hit stationary object when parking 22 13
% accidently clipped a car but kept quiet 19 11
% take risks (accelerate too quickly, overtake) 44 21
% suffer road rage 45 22
% who speed 25 13
% scare others with their driving 26 11
Attempts before passing test 2 3
No. of prangs to their vehicle in last 12months 1 2

Send an email to Matt Hardigree, the author of this post, at matt@jalopnik.com.

_________________
Safe Speed for Intelligent Road Safety through proper research, experience & guidance.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 01, 2011 20:59 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 23:09
Posts: 6737
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
I would say this is much more likely to be correlation of personality types than a causal factor, though.

_________________
"Show me someone who says that they have never exceeded a speed limit, and I'll show you a liar, or a menace." (Austin Williams - Director, Transport Research Group)

Any views expressed in this post are personal opinions and may not represent the views of Safe Speed


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 01, 2011 22:38 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 18:54
Posts: 4036
Location: Cumbria
Junk science at it's finest!

Might it JUST be possible that a higher proportion of "gamers" were nearer the 17 year old end of the sample and the majority of non-games near the other end? :roll:


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 01, 2011 22:58 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 14:06
Posts: 3654
Location: Oxfordshire
Quote:
take risks (accelerate too quickly, overtake)


How exactly are these things automatically considered "risks"?

_________________
Regulation without education merely creates more criminals.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 02, 2011 13:24 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:16
Posts: 7986
Location: Moved to London
Has driving distances been accounted for?
It could be argued that gamers drive more often, so experience more 'events' not because they are more risky, but because they have greater exposure.
Long distance drivers are usually male; gamers are usually male.

_________________
Views expressed are personal opinions and are not necessarily shared by the Safe Speed campaign


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 489 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.238s | 13 Queries | GZIP : Off ]