jomukuk wrote:
Within the industry it is now known as "Deptwork Rail", since it is now over 20 billion in dept.
It would be lower but its right hand doesn't know what its left hand is doing, or if it exists, nor does it care anyway.
It's not that either hand don't know what the other is doing -as I said -the higherups are all contraced and on bonuses to get maximum output for minimum outlay . Few years ago there was a purge on safety on track .All safety critical personal from contractors were given a day safety lecture at local NR HQ - but from my on /off track experiences -NR staff are the worst offenders .At one time recently there was a dispute where the person in charge of site safety could be over ruled, by a manager , on how many safety staff needed to do a job .Personally ,as a qualifie COSS , I'd have referred any interferance to both RMT and my safety officer . Fortunately , once a safety system had been set up ,in our firm , our managers woul back the decision against NR financial decisions .
However , how long ago was the HSS2 idea introduced - an was the decision to cut contractors from six to four part of this .Was the decision to with hold contracts to those firms with permanant staff ,as opposed to those with sub contracted staff also part of this -to get contractors charges down .Seems like conspiracy theory - but now ,it's coming true .
jomukuk wrote:
And since the health requirements are so high for those "on track" they are finding that getting and keeping workers is getting harder....one report was worried about obesity in the workforce....that same workforce that is out every night in all weathers keeping the system working....and living off pies and tea/coffee (no drink, since consuming alcohol or coming to work under the effects of same is a rigid sacking offence).
Ten years ago ,BUPA ,health firm used by NR ( then Railtrack) to confirm being medically fit to hold a safety critical position ,had smoking as it's major concern . My next medical - it was drinking .Next one - BMI - over a certain magic number and you were suspect . Then I was diagnosed as diabetic -with slightly high blood presure . No wonder ,I'd given up ciggies and we'd been banned from going out on track without a team leader . ( Some HSE reason put up by -NR)
It's not only drink that's a problem -days off ,most rail blokes make up for lost time -because of the drink ban -driving -the limit is one thing .On track ,or in a safety critical role ,even on a course , the limit is half that for a driver . Break that an it's instant sack ,with a five year ban .
jomukuk wrote:
I now have a broken son, after years of night work in really crap conditions, working for an industry that says it cares about its workers but only cares about itself.
British Industry ?
S***
I'm one of those whose job was lost in NR's purge of contractors . i used to do only safety jobs - something my boss set up ,to let me see out my days to let me get up to maximum pension allowance . So ,I'm not exactly a fan of NR .