jack272 wrote:
Hello Mole and thanks for your reply.Yes you are quite correct it seems to be a problem that seems to be ignored.
The thing is most of the tailgaters are the ones that also speed.
I think we need to be very careful about going down that route, because whilst I agree it is generally true, it tends to lead to the mindset that speeding is (in itself) automatically dangerous - which, of course, is not a view I share! It would be a bit like saying that most tailgaters are the ones who drive BMWs - yet it's obvious that this, doesn't necessarily make BMWs dangerous!
jack272 wrote:
I do not know if you have driven heavy vehicles or not but I have and I can tell you a loaded vehicle weighing 38T will take
more far more than twice the distance to stop than any car.
When you brake hard in a car the ABS will kick in and the vehicle will stop relatively quickly but in a heavier vehicle the weight takes over and the vehicle carries on for some distance.
No, 7.5 tonnes is the heaviest I've ever driven (and I didn't try an emergency stop either)! That said, although I'm quite happy to agree that they will take longer to stop, I'd be surprised if it really was more than twice the distance of a car! Certainly, the people who write the Highway Code are of the opinion that all road vehicles stop in the same distance!

I know almost all artics have ABS these days, and ESC is coming soon.
jack272 wrote:
How many LGV drivers have driven at say 55 mph and slammed on the brakes to see how long it takes? I have on private ground and it is frightening how long it does take.It is even more frightening when you see them traveling nose to tail on motorways.The problem is most do it everyday and become complacent.
When it comes to keeping a safe traveling distance with trucks the rule was 40mph....40 metres......50mph......50 metres and so on.
How many stick to that now?
Yeah, I often see the "heavies" following each other down the motorway, on their speed limiters, leaving a gap that I couldn't even PARK in, let alone stop in! I've no idea (a) why they do it and (b) why there isn't a lot more carnage that there seems to be! One thing I WOULD say is that the 40 metres at 40 and 50 at 50 thing is actually potentially quite dangerous though. NOTHING (car or truck) has a stpping distance that goes up in direct proportion to the speed. IF it WAS 40 metres at 40, it would be something like 60 metres at 50, 90 metres at 60...and so on. That's the whole reason for moving towards the "2 second" rule (where the interval between the vehicles is defined as a time) rather than a "distance" rule.