One would assume they'd use tasks where you can measure success eg correct answers to questions. Carrying out multiple automatic tasks is going to give completely different results and not what they're going to be testing. They'll be testing tasks that require full attention and the effect of splitting that attention between tasks that require full attention not between automatic tasks like walking. That study in the telegraph today isn't one of the better ones but there seem to be a few that have come to broadly similar conclusions with different methodologies and brain theories etc.
http://mashable.com/2012/08/13/multitas ... fographic/http://lifehacker.com/5922453/what-mult ... our-brainshttp://news.stanford.edu/news/2009/augu ... 82409.htmlIt's an interesting point the last study makes about filtering information. The heavy multi taskers were worse at filtering 'irrelevant' information but that begs the question in driving, what is irrelevant?
Lack of concentration/distraction are large factors in accident causation so it seems pertinent to find out which type of distraction/lack of concentration associated with multi tasking behaviour is detrimental and which is actually of benefit or whether they just cancel each other out somehow and it makes no difference.
The utah study also suggested again that driving and cell phones don't mix and that using a phone creates inattention blindness so someone using a phone doesn't actually see what they miss.
http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j& ... 2k&cad=rjaQuote:
In one such study, we observed over 1700 drivers as they approached a residential intersection with four-way stop signs. We deter- mined through observation whether the drivers were or were not using their cell phone as they approached the intersection and whether they came to a complete stop (as required by law) before proceeding through the intersection.1 The resulting data are presented in Table 1.
For drivers not using a cell phone, the majority stopped in accordance with traffic laws. By contrast, for the drivers who were observed talking on their cell phone as they approached the intersection, the majority failed to stop in accordance with traffic laws.
Seems to me that using a handheld phone causes an issue if users are just driving through stop signs. It would be interesting to see what the levels of violations of the stop signs were with drivers talking to passengers, using handsfree devices etc were and whether it is just a problem peculiar to physically holding a phone.
I think they point they are trying to make is that with safety critical activity like driving the multi tasking can cause a problem. If you have a wobbly video or wobbly walk there is little consequence. If you see that child step out half a second later because you were mentally occupied with something else, it is. It's also whether the lizard brain that is peculiar to driving snaps you out of the 'distracted' a lot faster than with artificial activities.