Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Tue Jul 21, 2026 20:58

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: A6(M) Stockport Bypass
PostPosted: Fri Sep 02, 2005 00:22 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2005 01:53
Posts: 52
Capri2.8i wrote:
Is there ever going to be a Hazel Grove by-pass?

This could possibly spawn an entire thread of its own.

(topic split by moderator)

The Highways Agency had a plan to built the A6(M) Stockport North-South bypass (including bypassing Hazel Grove) - along with the A555 extension from its current eastern end to meet the A6(M); extension of the A555 west to meet the M56 at Junction 5, and an A523 Poynton bypass. All of the roads were to be dual carriageways with grade-separated (i.e. motorway style) junctions throughout. Also in the pipeline was a bypass for Disley and High Lane on the A6.

The A555 currently built was finished in 1995 along with the A34 Wilmslow-Handforth bypass - the rest was shelved by John Prescot in 1998 as part of the "trunk road review", along with many other schemes around the UK.

SEMMMS (South East Manchester Multi-Modal Study) recommended using the protected corridor for this route, but with the roads built "to a more appropriate standard" - i.e. with traffic lights instead of motorway style junctions, a 40mph design speed, and a single-carriageway A523 bypass. THe Disley-High Lane bypass was shelved completely. This in my opinion is madness and is bound to be under-capacity. A public consultation happened quite some time ago, but it's now gone strangely quiet for about the last year - last I heard that there were some funding issues.

If anyone wants to see where the A6(M) would have gone, then then try here
link to the wider site


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 02, 2005 20:29 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Thu May 19, 2005 22:21
Posts: 925
Richard - Ahh yeah I remember hearing something about the downgrading of the scheme. Why is it that all the grand plans in this country end up as half-baked under-capacity done-on-the-cheap schemes?! Is the A555 that white-elephant road? The motorway to nowhere? I remeber thinking this just doesn't feel right when I first used it recently.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 03, 2005 02:32 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2005 01:53
Posts: 52
Capri2.8i wrote:
Richard - Ahh yeah I remember hearing something about the downgrading of the scheme. Why is it that all the grand plans in this country end up as half-baked under-capacity done-on-the-cheap schemes?! Is the A555 that white-elephant road? The motorway to nowhere? I remeber thinking this just doesn't feel right when I first used it recently.


Yes, the A555 is the road to nowhere. The whole of the rest of the route was to be at or better than the standard of the currently built section, but it doesn't look like we'll get anything nearly as good.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 03, 2005 20:46 
Offline
User

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 00:08
Posts: 748
Location: Grimsby
They have done the same with the Mansfield by-pass, single carriageway all the way, yet they have taken enough land to have dualled its entire length.
Don't get me wrong, it is a pleasure to use it in a truck, removes the nausea of having to go through Mansfield itself.
But I give it 5 years and they will have to rip it up and dual it, like they should have done in the first place.

_________________
Semper in excreta, nur quantitat variat.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 338 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.050s | 13 Queries | GZIP : Off ]