Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Wed Jul 01, 2026 05:41

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Sep 16, 2005 13:45 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 09:16
Posts: 3655
Just to keep feeding the "speed" paranoia

Quote:
Traffic calming measures are to placed on a road where four people were killed in a crash earlier this month.
Carmarthenshire Council will position the speed warning devices on the A474 Pontamman Road as soon as possible.
Other measures will also be looked at following the deaths of Natalie Malpas, 20, her brother Marc, 16, and brothers Aaron and Gavin Matthews, 16 and 19.
Police are investigating the cause of the accident but locals had complained of speeding before the crash.
The youngsters were in a Renault Megane car, which crashed into a garden wall on the approach to Ammanford around 2200BST on 7 September.
There had been four accidents resulting in minor injuries and two with serious injuries over five years prior to the fatal crash.
The council's director of technical services Richard Workman said temporary speed warning devices would be placed on the stretch of road, known locally as Glynmoch Flats, as soon as possible.
A speed detection exercise will be also be held next week to gather information on the levels of speeding on the road.
"This exercise forms part of the council's overall review of information from the accident," he said.
"We will be liaising with Dyfed-Powys Police and awaiting the outcome of their full accident report."
Residents living on the road had collected a petition calling for measures to tackle speeding on the days leading up to the crash.
Local councillor Kevin Madge said: "This was a terrible, tragic accident.
"Although the investigation into the accident is ongoing, and speed has not been established as the cause, it is of concern to the community."
At a meeting earlier this week town councillors in Ammanford heard a range of measures had been suggested since the accident.
These included reducing the 60mph limit on one stretch of the road to 50mph and building traffic islands to slow vehicles down.

A permanent speed camera was in place several hundred yards to the Ammanford side of the crash scene.


The whole focus of this feature is "speed"......even though they admit it may not have been relevant to the accident...it makes me sick

How can you suggest safety measures if you don't know the cause.

_________________
Speed camera policy Kills


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 16, 2005 14:22 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 20:28
Posts: 1267
Location: not too far in front, not too far behind.
to paraphrase your title

"no proof, lets say speeding is not a factor anyway"

I refer to my earlier post on this tragic incident.

_________________
COAST Not just somewhere to keep a beach.

A young loner on a crusade to champion the cause of the innocent, the helpless, the powerless, in a world of criminals who operate above the law.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 16, 2005 14:37 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 09:16
Posts: 3655
handy wrote:
to paraphrase your title

"no proof, lets say speeding is not a factor anyway"

I refer to my earlier post on this tragic incident.


Why not wait and see. I see speed mentioned several times. I do not see any other factors mentioned. Looks like they have already made their minds up.

They could implement a solution that makes matters worse, like the speed camera further down the road.... :x

_________________
Speed camera policy Kills


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 16, 2005 14:39 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 20:28
Posts: 1267
Location: not too far in front, not too far behind.
Gizmo wrote:
Why not wait and see. I see speed mentioned several times. I do not see any other factors mentioned. Looks like they have already made their minds up.


As have you, I suspect?

_________________
COAST Not just somewhere to keep a beach.

A young loner on a crusade to champion the cause of the innocent, the helpless, the powerless, in a world of criminals who operate above the law.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 16, 2005 15:11 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 22:35
Posts: 643
Location: South Wales
The problem is that according to the article they are looking at ways of reducing speed in the area regardless of the fact that they do not know that speeding was a factor.

A speed limit reduction to 50mph has been proposed but if this incident had happened at 50 mph (quite possible) then the reduction will serve no purpose, nor would the building of traffic islands.

We don't know what other suggestions have been made but these two were picked by the journalist and maybe telling in their inclusion so I can see how it makes it easy to jump to conclusions don't you agree?

Cheers

Paul


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 16, 2005 15:46 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 10:30
Posts: 2053
Location: South Wales (Roving all UK)
Is anyone seriously suggesting that a car going off the road, through a wall killing all passengers would be avoided by a 10mph reduction in posted limit?

If inappropriate speed was a factor I would hazard a guess that it would have been far in excess of the NSL.

Carmarthenshire, the land of my fathers!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 16, 2005 19:04 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 09:16
Posts: 3655
handy wrote:
As have you, I suspect?


Speed is mentioned 8 times in the feature.

What other possible causes are mentioned.

I rest my case.

What conclusion do you think I have come to...from what I have said

_________________
Speed camera policy Kills


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 16, 2005 20:27 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 20:28
Posts: 1267
Location: not too far in front, not too far behind.
Gizmo wrote:
I rest my case.

with no evidence?

gizmo wrote:
What conclusion do you think I have come to...from what I have said

I refer the honourable gentleman to my original post on the subject of this tragic incident.

My POINT was that there is an element of pot / kettle going on here. You castigate the subject of the piece for suggesting speed enforcement measures as a knee-jerk reaction with no proof yet you are able with arguably even less proof to say that he is entirely wrong.

As it happens, I disagree with the knee-jerk reaction of putting speed cameras on, however it may well be that traffic calming measures ARE more appropriate BUT, and this is a huge, J-Lo sized BUT, I will wait to see what the result of any enquiry is to say whether the solutions are well or poorly founded. A knee jerk reaction to a knee jerk reaction is pointless, worthless even.

_________________
COAST Not just somewhere to keep a beach.

A young loner on a crusade to champion the cause of the innocent, the helpless, the powerless, in a world of criminals who operate above the law.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 16, 2005 22:44 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 01:48
Posts: 526
Location: Netherlands
handy wrote:
A knee jerk reaction to a knee jerk reaction is pointless, worthless even.

Hi handy, this is a truly EXCELLENT line, love it :thumbsup:.

Mind you, I understand where Gizmo is coming from on this, and his post does at least bring the original "knee jerk reaction" to our attention :gossip:, so I wouldn't call it worthless.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 16, 2005 23:01 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 20:17
Posts: 244
Location: Thetford, Norfolk
I guess we know the outcome of this, and all it will do is mean that normal road users going about their business will now be taxed for doing no harm.

I've never understood why the rest of us have to be penalised and dumbed down just because boy racers who cant drive and plow into trees and the like while showing off to their mates, with usually no regard for the limits.

It shows no grip on reality. It creates is a nice little earner though.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 16, 2005 23:15 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2004 15:43
Posts: 2416
handy wrote:
A knee jerk reaction to a knee jerk reaction is pointless, worthless even.

Not if it consists solely of pointing out that the first is a knee jerk reaction. Unless Gizmo is in a position to do more than that his "knee jerk" reaction has been merely to point out the senselessness of a knee jerk reaction, i.e. anti-speed measures in response to a crash that as yet has not been linked to speed. As such it is far from worthless. When one group is giving in to knee jerk reactions IMO it is very useful if the knee jerk reaction of others is to let it be known.

_________________
Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler - Einstein


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 17, 2005 15:49 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
Thats like the reply by the "smile camera partnership" in Waewickshire whos reply to the row over how much money the government is making from speeding is thet there would be no row if people stopped speeding.
They say that £1.9M spent on them is money spent on "road safety"
Wonder what would happen if everybody in Warks drove within the speed limit - ahem - reduce the limits and say nothing?? :evil:


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.033s | 9 Queries | GZIP : Off ]