Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Wed Nov 12, 2025 20:41

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Rail cutbacks
PostPosted: Sat Oct 01, 2005 20:58 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
Meanwhile we are all being told that we should travel on public transport. At the same time stations are closing etc etc on the grounds that certain routes are not economical - so how do we use a sercvice that doesen't exist.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0, ... 02,00.html


But the most damaging cuts are being planned for the five years from 2009, when a new budget will be set for the railways. The Department for Transport has begun secret negotations over which services, stations and little-used branch lines will be eliminated.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 01, 2005 22:19 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 15:00
Posts: 1109
Location: Can't see.
Don't have a link but someone did the sums a couple of years ago and if just 5% of car drivers in londons peak hours took public transport instead, public transport would be unable to cope with the numbers and go into meltdown, and i expect anyone who uses bus, train or tube in london would agree that thousands more passengers is simply not viable. Wheras the 5% car loss would make little difference to road traffic, so like it or not people using their cars are essentual to everyone getting everywhere... not quite the evil selfish demons that need pricing off the road the government would have you believe.

_________________
Fear is a weapon of mass distraction


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 01, 2005 22:22 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 00:15
Posts: 5232
Location: Windermere
Do you know how much these "Community" railways cost us the tax payer to run?

We have a line at the back of my house the Windermere to Oxenholme line - about 12 miles long. It's existance here in the 21st Century is utterly pointless!
Quote:
Depite the £300 million per year that the taxpayer contributes to Community Rail, astonishingly little useful data is available from the Strategic Rail Authority's February 2004 consultation paper or the Development Strategy, published in November. The following summarises:

From the Consultation paper: Community Rail routes contain 1,300 route miles or 12.5% of the national network and include 420 stations (17% of the total).

From the Development Strategy

(A) The network length is now 1,200 miles.

(B) Annual infrastructure costs are £100,000 per track mile – including station renewal.

(C) Rolling stock costs for leasing and heavy maintenance are £100,000 per year per vehicle representing 50-75% of total vehicle costs.


I don't mind people clinging to the nostalgic wish to ride on a train, but I object to paying for it!! :x
While the track is closed for maintainance, a coach service runs just as efficiently, and at much lower cost, on existing roads!
NO heavy freight can be brought to Windermere, and even the newspapers arrive by road now - it's quicker AND cheaper!

_________________
Time to take responsibility for our actions.. and don't be afraid of speaking out!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 01, 2005 22:41 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 23:09
Posts: 6737
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
Ernest Marsh wrote:
We have a line at the back of my house the Windermere to Oxenholme line - about 12 miles long. It's existance here in the 21st Century is utterly pointless!

Bear in mind that if Network Rail were to close this it would almost certainly become a preserved railway, given the tourist potential of the area.

For lines of this kind I would have thought there could be a half-way house between Network Rail and preservation status, so that they were owned and maintained by a private trust, but trains from the general network could still use them.

_________________
"Show me someone who says that they have never exceeded a speed limit, and I'll show you a liar, or a menace." (Austin Williams - Director, Transport Research Group)

Any views expressed in this post are personal opinions and may not represent the views of Safe Speed


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 02, 2005 17:26 
Offline
User

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 00:08
Posts: 748
Location: Grimsby
So, how does this idea sit with the people that want freaight taken off the roads and moved by rail, or haven't they thought of that one yet?

_________________
Semper in excreta, nur quantitat variat.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 02, 2005 17:29 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 23:09
Posts: 6737
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
Dratsabasti wrote:
So, how does this idea sit with the people that want freaight taken off the roads and moved by rail, or haven't they thought of that one yet?

I think it's nonsense. The fact that the railways currently are taking far more subsidy than they were before privatisation is all to do with the ludicrously complex structure of the industry and safety gold-plating.

If anything, we should be expanding our railways - but we need to get a grip on the costs.

_________________
"Show me someone who says that they have never exceeded a speed limit, and I'll show you a liar, or a menace." (Austin Williams - Director, Transport Research Group)

Any views expressed in this post are personal opinions and may not represent the views of Safe Speed


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2005 14:57 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
Yet another bright idea - http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article//0 ... 15637.html

Spend a fortune digging up old rail lines, turn them into a concrete bus road .


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 09, 2005 20:42 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 15:00
Posts: 1109
Location: Can't see.
botach wrote:
Yet another bright idea - http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article//0 ... 15637.html

Spend a fortune digging up old rail lines, turn them into a concrete bus road .


Quote:
But rail enthusiasts argue that buses are no substitute for trains and that people prefer to glide through the countryside on steel wheels running on rails rather than on tyres humming on concrete.


hahahahahahahahahahahahhaa what planet are these romanticists on? have they ever been on a train? i think most "people would prefer" a system thats frequent, clean, runs on time and they can get a seat.

_________________
Fear is a weapon of mass distraction


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2005 06:40 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2004 15:43
Posts: 2416
hairyben wrote:
i think most "people would prefer" a system thats frequent, clean, runs on time and they can get a seat.

That's called a car isn't it? :lol:

_________________
Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler - Einstein


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2005 10:16 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 10:44
Posts: 485
Location: Glos, UK
hairyben wrote:
hahahahahahahahahahahahhaa what planet are these romanticists on? have they ever been on a train? i think most "people would prefer" a system thats frequent, clean, runs on time and they can get a seat.

Amen. Also, it would be nice if a Cheltenham -> London return didn't cost £95.50 and take half an hour longer than driving. Mind you, I thought £95.50 was a lot until I spoke to a couple of our guys at the office who do Staines -> Manchester now and then; a ticket purchased on the day of travel, peak time, is £185!

_________________
Carl Prescott


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2005 10:30 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 00:04
Posts: 2311
and just to put that into perspective, you can do this for about the same price.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2005 18:18 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
johnsher wrote:
and just to put that into perspective, you can do this for about the same price.


Ah but our lot give better value with the excuses for the late arrivals

Wrong type of snow,wet leaves,

frozen points -

probably now got a whole bookload of good uns printed up

and just think how easy it would be if you could find someone to ask in a station or understand a rail announcer, specially trained to be mis understood all the time , except when announcing a change of platform with 90 seconds to spare.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.032s | 12 Queries | GZIP : Off ]