Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Mon Oct 27, 2025 15:03

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Nov 25, 2005 06:31 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
I've been unable to find 'Highway economics note one' for over a year on the DfT web site. But a link in Hansard found it. Here it is:

http://www.dft.gov.uk/stellent/groups/d ... 30763.hcsp

This is a gross distortion of road safety truth. It is used to create inflated economic estimates of the costs of road crashes as a means of favouring other modes of transport and thereby promoting modal shift.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 25, 2005 08:17 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 00:04
Posts: 2311
human costs seems to be defined as "a number that we just made up to make the figures look bad".


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 25, 2005 10:46 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 16:12
Posts: 1040
Location: West Midlands
The human costs for a fatal are an interesting one to consider...

lets pick a number out of the air in order to justify whatever we want wrote:
human costs, based on WTP values, which represent pain, grief and suffering to the casualty, relatives and friends, and, for fatal casualties, the intrinsic loss of enjoyment of life over and above the consumption of goods and services.

They quote an average number of £860,380 for the human cost.

But the same government has quite different figures for the human cost (or compensation paid anyway) if it isn't a road accident - lets take a terrorist attack for instance

BBC reporting on compensation from UK government for people killed in July terrorist attacks wrote:
Government rules mean bereaved families get £11,000...

A slight discrepancy perhaps?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/4363040.stm


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 25, 2005 13:13 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 16:34
Posts: 923
Location: UK
One SCP made a claim about saving £8m and it was posted on traffic-answers.com - I argued for ages but they couldn't grasp the facts so I gave up:
http://www.traffic-answers.com/forum/in ... pic=2411.0
edit: I looked just now and I think they grasped it in the end!

This is the article that sparked it, the wording is pretty amazing - some selected parts:

http://www.safespeedforlife.com/readnews.asp?id=42
Quote:
SAFETY CAMERAS SAVE US MILLIONS (28/10/2005)

Safety cameras in Northumbria have saved local health and emergency services millions of pounds over the past year.

It is impossible to estimate the emotional cost to friends and families of those killed and seriously injured on the roads. However, the average financial cost of these collisions has recently been estimated at £1,492, 910 for a fatal collision, £174,530 for a serious injury collision and £17,550 for a slight collision.*
....
*Hansard written answers 12 September 2005


The fact they quoted a Hansard written answer shows they didn't understand the TRUE source of the figures, otherwise they will have seen that the £1.4 million DOES include emotional cost!

The £1m+ figure is widely abused by SCP's, Julian Hewitt from Hants SCP has used it several times over the years saying each fatal costs "local taxpayers" £Xm and it is a cost "we all have to pay".

Gareth


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 25, 2005 13:53 
Offline
User

Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 17:00
Posts: 169
Location: Leicester
This sort of rubbish ignores the fact that accidents make no difference to the death rate. It is still one death per person in the long term.
It is likely that in the process of dying, or getting ill and recovering in the future, medical costs costs will be incurred. The "emotional" costs, funeral costs etc. will be the same whenever the person dies.
So the only thing that matters is the ADDITIONAL cost of clearing up after the accident, deploying of emergency services etc., and MINUS the cost of the medical treatment that person would have needed in the remainder of their life.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 25, 2005 15:46 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 16:12
Posts: 1040
Location: West Midlands
Which is a very good point.

The cost of a premature death to society is the benefits derived from the rest of their expected life MINUS the costs to support the rest of their expected life. Everything apart from direct accident cleanup is just deferred until you finally die of something else.

Viewed in this brutal way, then somebody who dies in a RTA at or after retirement age has a large negative cost - or to put it bluntly they save the UK the costs of their pension and benefits, the costs of health and residential care.

For a significant number of people, if you die then it is a direct financial benefit to the UK, because they have had all the money they can out of you, and you are now just a selfish cost taking away money from everybody else.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 02, 2005 19:21 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
2004 version published today:

http://www.dft.gov.uk/stellent/groups/d ... 10642.hcsp

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 02, 2005 20:09 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 00:15
Posts: 5232
Location: Windermere
Rewolf wrote:
Quote:
lets pick a number out of the air in order to justify whatever we want wrote:
human costs, based on WTP values, which represent pain, grief and suffering to the casualty, relatives and friends, and, for fatal casualties, the intrinsic loss of enjoyment of life over and above the consumption of goods and services.


They quote an average number of £860,380 for the human cost.


Pain, grief and suffering? After watching this government and the Safety Camera Partnerships in action, I must be due thousands of pounds in compensation!!! Who do I sue, and when will the cheque arrive? :lol:

Seriously, if those figures were correctly arrived at, then we could all sue the BBC for showing us the results of the tsunami, or the 7/7 bombings!

_________________
Time to take responsibility for our actions.. and don't be afraid of speaking out!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 03, 2005 10:55 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 09:16
Posts: 3655
There are about 350 deaths a year on the railways, what cost it that.

Also much of the cost is covered by insurance companies.

Its political cobblers.

_________________
Speed camera policy Kills


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.016s | 12 Queries | GZIP : Off ]