Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Thu Jun 04, 2026 21:52

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Aug 06, 2004 09:38 
Offline
User

Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2004 16:45
Posts: 80
Location: North East
I've just read the following article posted on www.onethirdlie.org.uk website.

www.telegraph.co.uk

It's an article about an old guy who was working as a marshal at a local car boot sale. Police were operating a manual Speed Check site about 300yrds down the road from when the man was. So he, made up a placard saying "Speed Trap 300 Yards" to inform oncoming drivers. The police saw the sign and charged the old guy. He's been through the magistrates court and been fined and banned for driving for a year for obstructing an officer in his duties.

Two things:

1. Why has this poor guy been banned from driving when he wasn't even commiting a traffic offence.

2. The prossecution stated: "In displaying this sign the defendant was giving motorists advanced warning of a road safety camera being operated by the police 300 yards further along the road". The police have to ensure appropriate signs are displayed within at least 1km of any speed check site. (ACPO Guidelines, Version 2.1, December 2003).

This storey is yet another fine example of the police being allowed to avoid sticking by the rules purely to hammer a member of the public. This is a particularly frustrating example at that!

PS: Is it a coincidence that the officer involved's surname is Cashman??


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 06, 2004 17:28 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2004 15:43
Posts: 2416
Yes, this happened in Farnborough. It's actually worse than you think, because the magistrate refused to suspend the ban pending appeal. Of course, by the time the appeal is heard the ban will be over. Very petty, and does Hampshire plod no favours. BTW, another local magistrate wrote in to the local paper expressing some concerns over the handling of the case. I can't remember exactly what was said, but I'll try to find a link.

_________________
Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler - Einstein


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.018s | 13 Queries | GZIP : Off ]