Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Sat Aug 01, 2026 07:37

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 110 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 21:45 
Offline
User

Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 10:33
Posts: 13
malcolmw wrote:
... and the reason high ranking police officers are provided with drivers is ...?


I can think of two reasons straight away , one is for security as the driver will be an "advanced" police driver who has current training in escape and evasion tactics ( though I dont know if evading speed cameras is part of the training :D ) and the second is that in common with high ranking businessmen and others of that ilk their time is valuable and quite frequently the car is used as a mobile office.

My personal opinion is that his position as ACPO spokesman for Road Policing is now untenable , this wasnt a couple of miles an hour over the limit and caught out by some half hidden scamera , 90mph is quick enough for you to know full well that you are way past the speed limit , for someone in his position to make that sort of error is embarassing to say the least, I believe that Paul hit the nail on the head by saying that he was probably driving to the conditions , not the speed limit .


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 23:51 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2004 23:42
Posts: 3820
Oops.


One thing to wish for hidden scams.. but then as Buchner once wrote in his play about Danton's Death.. the "Revolution gobbles up her children"

I guess he got "carried away" on a nice bit of road. Like lots of others beofre him.

Normally, I guess most would offer several cups of sweet inky tea and sympathy ..

But :roll: This guy happens to be in charge of Traffic and telling everyone else to slow it down... and wanted hidden cams to persuade drivers to tone it down. :banghead:

It does rather undermine his credibility. I have to say so., You guys .. I know this. You have the right to expect that someone who stands for enforcing a speed limit so vocally and publicly takes care to apply COAST himself and not speed. On this occasion . I side with BRAKE who say he must consider his position here. I note Paul says similar :bow:

I am sure Merry felt safe .. and that this cracking piece of road was empty at the time.. but even so. We all know that such roads are prime targets and that this road is a hot tourist road for NT propeerties and Llangollen's steam railway and hot air balloon races. :roll:

We could all go mad on such roads.. but senior cops have to abide by principles all the same. I can state "professional discretion" because this Force places a high priority on this in al areas of its work. But robots/automated means do not give discretion. We all know this. :roll:

_________________
Take with a chuckle or a grain of salt
Drive without COAST and it's all your own fault!

A SMILE is a curve that sets everything straight (P Diller).

A Smiley Per post
FINES USfor our COAST!


Approach love and cooking with reckless abandon - but driving with a smile and a COAST calm mind.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 01, 2007 14:38 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 22:02
Posts: 3266
If I got caught doing 90 in a 60, I would be working on a plea of mitigation or hardship.
If my employer needed me to drive there would be some serious negotiation required to keep my job.
If a plumber or electrician got caught they would be looking for a recruit a mate to drive to keep thier bussiness afloat.

They would not be given a cushy job planning the olyimpics and a chaufer.
Even if he gets banned for 6 months , he has still got off light.

_________________
Speed limit sign radio interview. TV Snap Unhappy
“It has never been the rule in this country – I hope it never will be - that suspected criminal offences must automatically be the subject of prosecution” He added that there should be a prosecution: “wherever it appears that the offence or the circumstances of its commission is or are of such a character that a prosecution in respect thereof is required in the public interest”
This approach has been endorsed by Attorney General ever since 1951. CPS Code


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 01, 2007 19:49 
Offline
Camera Partnership Staff
Camera Partnership Staff
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2005 19:48
Posts: 1995
SafeSpeed wrote:
I've just heard that he was on holiday at the time so the possibility of the Police exemption is completely out of the window.


:o , a CC is never off duty, i wonder was it raining in Sheffield that day

_________________
now retired


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 02, 2007 09:05 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2004 19:19
Posts: 1050
Assuming the speed recording device was accurate that probably meant he had close to 100mph on the clock. Of course there is nothing wrong with that kind of speed in the right conditions. However, hypocrisy is a more serious crime.

There has obviously been some negotiation, as he has only just received the NIP


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 02, 2007 10:42 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
diy wrote:
...as he has only just received the NIP


What makes you think that?

I can tell you that the story broke because a welsh free-lance journalist spotted the court listing for 21st November.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 02, 2007 15:59 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2004 19:19
Posts: 1050
The news item said no summons had been received


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 02, 2007 16:47 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:16
Posts: 7986
Location: Moved to London
diy wrote:
The news item said no summons had been received

That doesn't mean the NIP must have been received recently.
Have some people not waited months for their summons after returning their NIP?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 02, 2007 18:15 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 22:02
Posts: 3266
As a court date has been set they have filed papers with the court a few days before the 6 month cut off.

It would be interesting to know who leaked the information that a court date had been set If he has not received a summons yet?

brunstrom? :twisted: the court? :evil:

_________________
Speed limit sign radio interview. TV Snap Unhappy
“It has never been the rule in this country – I hope it never will be - that suspected criminal offences must automatically be the subject of prosecution” He added that there should be a prosecution: “wherever it appears that the offence or the circumstances of its commission is or are of such a character that a prosecution in respect thereof is required in the public interest”
This approach has been endorsed by Attorney General ever since 1951. CPS Code


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 01:41 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:16
Posts: 7986
Location: Moved to London
Bump!

Quote:
Mr Hughes is due to appear at Wrexham Magistrates’ Court on November 21.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 01:51 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
smeggy wrote:
Bump!

Quote:
Mr Hughes is due to appear at Wrexham Magistrates’ Court on November 21.


:hehe:

Am I getting ready or am I getting ready?

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 12:27 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 14:06
Posts: 3654
Location: Oxfordshire
Is anyone else going to be going to the court?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 13:50 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 04:11
Posts: 171
Location: South East
RobinXe wrote:
Is anyone else going to be going to the court?

at a guess, probably a representative or two from the media


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 13:52 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 22:02
Posts: 3266
Sorry, can't go... :cry:

They will be saving up some news to blank out this
12 more bodies from peter tobin... or something...

_________________
Speed limit sign radio interview. TV Snap Unhappy
“It has never been the rule in this country – I hope it never will be - that suspected criminal offences must automatically be the subject of prosecution” He added that there should be a prosecution: “wherever it appears that the offence or the circumstances of its commission is or are of such a character that a prosecution in respect thereof is required in the public interest”
This approach has been endorsed by Attorney General ever since 1951. CPS Code


Last edited by anton on Mon Nov 19, 2007 13:54, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 13:52 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 14:06
Posts: 3654
Location: Oxfordshire
cabbie wrote:
RobinXe wrote:
Is anyone else going to be going to the court?

at a guess, probably a representative or two from the media


Well duh! I meant from here!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 13:59 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
The Wrexham court listings clerk told Sky TV News this morning that Mr Hughes was not 'required to attend'.

I'm DESPERATE to fully unravel what's going on. Any ideas? This is proving very difficult. The court can't really cope with the media and SYP and ACPO are apparently in full blackout / lockdown.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 14:00 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 04:11
Posts: 171
Location: South East
RobinXe wrote:
Well duh! I meant from here!

yeah - I know...but couldn't resist


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 14:03 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 14:06
Posts: 3654
Location: Oxfordshire
SafeSpeed wrote:
The Wrexham court listings clerk told Sky TV News this morning that Mr Hughes was not 'required to attend'.

I'm DESPERATE to fully unravel what's going on. Any ideas? This is proving very difficult. The court can't really cope with the media and SYP and ACPO are apparently in full blackout / lockdown.


If he's not going to be there I am less inclined to attend, but if I were to then surely some questions would be answered. They can't conduct the proceedings in camera purely because of the defendant's position, for heaven's sake!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 14:24 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
s this accurate ?

_________________
lets bring sanity back to speed limits.
Drivers are like donkeys -they respond best to a carrot, not a stick .Road safety experts are like Asses - best kept covered up ,or sat on


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 14:51 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 14:06
Posts: 3654
Location: Oxfordshire
Potentially not. It states that he has been summoned, but then reports that the police force denies the issue of a summons.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 110 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 407 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.132s | 13 Queries | GZIP : Off ]