JJ wrote:
Quantify your statement and provide the figures. You can't.
That's
really rich, coming from you.
I would normally be a lot more scathing than that, but Paul has strict rules about
ad hominem attacks.
Quote:
This goes against all of the research and reporting from the qualified organisations that have reported on this sch as TRL and the organisations responsible for the WHO report.
I asked you for a link to that report, but I see none is forthcoming.
What are you so scared of?
Quote:
Again, quantify it. You can't. The relationship is directly proportional, what is the factor that relates the 2? You can't say and the energy imparted in the fatal force is variable but never the less directly proportional.
You really have no idea what you're talking about, do you?
Show me
any model which shows any quantifiable relationship between free travelling speed and impact speed. You can't, can you?
BTW As you're now speaking about energy imparted, here's a little quiz for you:
A car hits a pedestrian without braking. What proportion of the car's kinetic energy is dissipated by the pedestrian?
Clue: the car is hardly slowed at all by the collision, so it has almost the same amount of kinetic energy after the collision as before.
Cheers
Peter