Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Tue Jun 09, 2026 21:35

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 62 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 31, 2006 15:35 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2006 13:01
Posts: 472
Quote:
1. SOMEBODY saw fit to bring the case in the first place, having seen the video.


2. He was firstly found not guilty - so why was this verdict set aside? Were the original magistrates incompetant?


1 - I understand he left his video recording on and it was discovered by the person reviewing his tape. His superiors reported him.

2 - This is the same judge that ruled ed_o_brain guilty of inconsiderate cycling. Draw your own conclusions from that.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 02, 2006 19:14 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2004 23:42
Posts: 3820
Different case .. different charges and different points of law.

No conclusion leaps to the eye.

_________________
Take with a chuckle or a grain of salt
Drive without COAST and it's all your own fault!

A SMILE is a curve that sets everything straight (P Diller).

A Smiley Per post
FINES USfor our COAST!


Approach love and cooking with reckless abandon - but driving with a smile and a COAST calm mind.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 62 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.026s | 11 Queries | GZIP : Off ]