Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Sat Apr 25, 2026 07:07

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 22:56 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 21:41
Posts: 3608
Location: North West
Came across this sad piece on the Waily's site just now.

Think we may have had a thread on it before? :?

Quote:
Did a driver's sneeze cause three deaths?
Last updated at 20:40pm on 27th March 2007

Neil Margerison, 23, appeared before Lincoln Crown Court facing three charges of causing death by dangerous driving
A lorry driver accused of causing the deaths of three members of a family in a 'horrific' accident claimed it happened because he sneezed, a court has heard.

Neil Margerison said it meant he was unable to stop his 40-ton HGV smashing into the back of a car containing RAF Flight Lieutenant Neville Rees, his wife Karen and their 11-year-old son Andrew.

Their car was crushed so severely between Margerison's vehicle and another lorry that some witnesses did not realise it was there, the court heard.

The Reeses' other son David, 14, who was with friends at the time, was orphaned by the tragedy. The prosecution alleges that Margerison's claim that he sneezed was simply a lie to cover up the fact that the 23-year-old was not paying attention when the traffic in front of him braked.

Lincoln Crown Court heard that the crash happened at 10.55am on January 5 last year on the A17 near RAF Cranwell, Lincolnshire, where Flight Lieutenant Rees trained flying instructors.



Flight Lieutenant Neville Rees, 43, his wife Karen, 41, and their son Andrew were killed when their Peugeot estate car was crushed


A box van travelling at the front of a queue of traffic slowed to a near halt. Behind the van was another HGV and behind that was the Peugeot 406 estate driven by Flight Lieutenant Rees.

Michael Fowler, prosecuting, said: "Margerison's lorry drove into the back of very nearly stationary traffic. The Peugeot was in front of his lorry.

"The car was crushed between his lorry, which weighed some 40 tons, and the trailer of the next vehicle in front, which was another articulated lorry.

"It was so substantially depressed that some of those at the scene were not aware that there was a third vehicle trapped between the two lorries."

A jury heard that the car - with Flight Lieutenant Rees in the driver's seat, his wife next to him and their son in the rear - burst into flames as a result of the collision.

Mr Fowler said Margerison's lorry was travelling at more than 17mph when it struck the Peugeot, allegedly proving he was not paying attention.

Margerison, of Clayton Le Dale, Blackburn, later told police he might have sneezed an instant before the crash. But Mr Fowler said Margerison 'made up' the claim, adding: 'You will hear it suggested he sneezed at some time during the unfolding of these events.

"If that was the case - and the prosecution don't accept it is - it might explain why he was driving dangerously. But we say it does not provide a defence.

"That is something he made up to cover up the reality, namely that at the crucial time, for some reason, he allowed himself to be grossly distracted."

Mr Fowler said Margerison's attention might have been diverted by a wide-load convoy moving down the road or traffic on the nearby airfield.

He told the court: "A sneeze is insufficient to account for the situation where the Peugeot was ultimately hit at a speed in excess of 17mph.

"Had he been keeping a proper lookout he would still have been able to stop in time. And if he sneezed then he should have adjusted his driving."

Flight Lieutenant Rees had completed several tours as a Hercules captain before qualifying as a flying instructor and joining 45 (R) Squadron in June 2005.

Paying tribute last year, RAF commanders called him 'a dedicated family man and highly professional officer and pilot'.

Margerison denies causing the deaths of Flight Lieutenant Rees, 43, Mrs Rees, 41, and Andrew by driving dangerously.

The trial continues

_________________
If you want to get to heaven - you have to raise a little hell!

Smilies are contagious
They are just like the flu
We use our smilies on YOU today
Now Good Causes are smiling too!

KEEP SMILING
It makes folk wonder just what you REALLY got up to last night!

Smily to penny.. penny to pound
safespeed prospers-smiles all round! !

But the real message? SMILE.. GO ON ! DO IT! and the world will smile with you!
Enjoy life! You only have the one bite at it.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 04:46 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
The difference between a 17mph hit and a miss is about 1 second's emergency braking.

However the difference between the miss and 'normal driving' - coming reasonably to rest behind a queue is several seconds more.

I don't personally believe the sneeze excuse, but nevertheless it would appear to raise the required 'reasonable doubt'.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 10:28 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2004 19:19
Posts: 1050
its confusing as to why a charge of dangerous driving is being used - is this the result of the new definition proposed. I think careless may be more appropriate.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 10:51 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 14:06
Posts: 3654
Location: Oxfordshire
I know the spot, the road passes under the runway centreline and then parallels the downwind leg of the visual circuit, so we regularly get lolligaggers rubbernecking at the aircraft whilst they are driving. There are also radar installations to oggle, if that floats your boat, and speed cameras too, so altogether a rather distracting section of road in certain circumstances.

I have pretty massive sneezes, and I still cannot fathom how one, or even two, could impair one's driving to such a degree as to make this incident unavoidable. I can only suppose that tailgating was occurring.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 10:51 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 13:54
Posts: 1711
Location: NW Kent
I found this with a quick Google search

http://www.justice.org.uk/images/pdfs/roadtraffic.pdf

Dated May 2005, anybody know if this is the most up to date?

_________________
Driving fast is for a particular time and place, I can do it I just only do it occasionally because I am a gentleman.
- James May


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 53 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.018s | 10 Queries | GZIP : Off ]