Safe Speed Forums

If anyones interested there's a poll in the London Evening Standard "Have we got to many speed cameras?"

_________________
Useless laws weaken necessary laws.

The thing I find quite worrying is that 35% don't think we have!

Is it fair then, to think that 35% of road-users believe that adhering at all times to the speed limit means therefore they are safe?

That's a hell of a lot of road-users

_________________
Pecunia Prius Equitas et Salus

35% saying no - could be the e petition's friend -the multi voter.

_________________
lets bring sanity back to speed limits.
Drivers are like donkeys -they respond best to a carrot, not a stick .Road safety experts are like Asses - best kept covered up ,or sat on

I just voted YES and the NOs are down to 26%. Maybe I should vote again - several times.

_________________
Brian

Now down to 25%

_________________
Speed camera policy Kills

Why do you keep rattling out this misappropriated inference?

Just because some people support speed cameras, it in NO WAY implies that they think it is safe to consistently travel at the speed limit.

perhaps they do not drive- someone using public transport/bicycle/pedestrian with little knowledge about driving will, when told traffic cameras slow down cars and make roads safer, believe it without question because they know no better.

_________________
Fear is a weapon of mass distraction

Now 75% think there are too many speed cameras

Why do you keep rattling out this garbage?

_________________
Pecunia Prius Equitas et Salus

But it does imply that they haven't thought things through properly. It implies they are of a lesser intellect.

_________________
Pecunia Prius Equitas et Salus

Please - let's try to stick to WHAT people are arguing and concluding, and the validity of their thought processes and conclusions rather than how competent they are at reasoning the points or their depth of thought.