Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Mon Feb 02, 2026 13:29

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 13:05 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 09:16
Posts: 3655
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/itn/20070618/tuk-soccer-star-sheringham-arrested-dba1618.html

Quote:
Former England striker Teddy Sheringham has been arrested after allegedly giving false details about a speeding offence.

Sheringham, who won 51 caps for England, is one of three top soccer stars who have been questioned over similar allegations.

The 41-year-old, who was awarded an MBE last week, was freed on bail after being questioned by officers on suspicion of perverting the course of justice.

A Scotland Yard spokesman said: "A 41-year-old man was arrested on May 15 on suspicion of perverting the course of justice when he attended, by appointment, an east London police station.

"It is alleged he gave false details regarding an alleged speeding offence."

Sheringham has been bailed to return on a date in July pending further inquiries.

West Ham striker Bobby Zamora, 26, was arrested last Wednesday over allegations he gave false details in relation to police camera footage of a car apparently speeding.

A third player, 31-year-old midfielder Shaun Newton, was also questioned on suspicion of perverting the course of justice, two days after Sheringham was interviewed.

They were also both released on bail to return to a police station on a date in July.


Another football celeb falls "foul" of the law over speed camera justice! (sorry about the pun)

_________________
Speed camera policy Kills


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 18:10 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 20:28
Posts: 1267
Location: not too far in front, not too far behind.
Gizmo wrote:
Another football celeb falls "foul" of the law over speed camera justice! (sorry about the pun)


nope, he was arrested for perverting the course of justice.

_________________
COAST Not just somewhere to keep a beach.

A young loner on a crusade to champion the cause of the innocent, the helpless, the powerless, in a world of criminals who operate above the law.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 18:21 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 10:30
Posts: 2053
Location: South Wales (Roving all UK)
and so the crimilisation of britain continues!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 18:31 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2006 00:42
Posts: 832
BBC News;

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/6762815.stm


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 18:36 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 21:10
Posts: 1693
civil engineer wrote:
and so the crimilisation of britain continues!


I wonder how long it will be before a Jury (are these cases held before a jury?) decides that it is the policy that is "Perverting the course of Justice" and not the defendant!

(I dont know about the UK but I beleve that in at least some parts of the US there exists the concept of "Jury Nullification" IE if the Jury feels the Law is stupid or the defendent justified they can find a verdict of "Not guilty" despite the defendant clearly having done what he is accused of)

_________________
"The road to a police state is paved with public safety legislation"


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 19:21 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 22:02
Posts: 3266
If the right to silence goes our way on the 29th, I fail to see how they could have broken the law as the scameraships will not have been entitled to request the info in the first place.

_________________
Speed limit sign radio interview. TV Snap Unhappy
“It has never been the rule in this country – I hope it never will be - that suspected criminal offences must automatically be the subject of prosecution” He added that there should be a prosecution: “wherever it appears that the offence or the circumstances of its commission is or are of such a character that a prosecution in respect thereof is required in the public interest”
This approach has been endorsed by Attorney General ever since 1951. CPS Code


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 17:22 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2004 19:19
Posts: 1050
there have been cases in the uk where despite strong guidance the jury finds the defendant not guilty. The judge has the power to dismiss the jury, but I don't think its ever happened.

I believe there was an assisted suicide case a few years back, where the jury dismissed man slaughter despite the defendant admitting his role in the death


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.036s | 12 Queries | GZIP : Off ]