Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Mon Jan 26, 2026 20:08

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 11:51 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 21:27
Posts: 247
Location: Near Stockport
The Times

Quote:
THOUSANDS of deaths and injuries could be prevented each year by a new type of traffic light that detects when a vehicle is about to ignore a red signal and delays showing green to drivers on opposing roads.

<snip>

It gives warning, however, that there would have to be strict controls to prevent drivers abusing the system. Cameras would have to be installed alongside the new lights to catch motorists who knew that other vehicles would have to wait if they jumped a red signal.

So people in stolen cars will now be able to jump the lights safe in the knowledge that green will be delayed for the cross road, and the camera will result in the legal owner being prosecuted.

Who dreams up these halfbaked schemes?

_________________
Brian


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 11:57 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 15:05
Posts: 1225
Location: Glasgow
This is just spin to justify the continued and extended use of red light cameras. They have come up with a genuine way to improve safety at traffic lights, but they don't want to lose the opportunity to keep the revenue flowing in as a result.....


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 12:23 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 21:27
Posts: 247
Location: Near Stockport
r11co wrote:
This is just spin to justify the continued and extended use of red light cameras. They have come up with a genuine way to improve safety at traffic lights, but they don't want to lose the opportunity to keep the revenue flowing in as a result.....


I agreee that there is much in the proposal which makes sense, in theory at least. However I've just thought of three other problems.

1. The idea that if there is "no traffic" approaching a light turning red, the other one can go green sooner, could pose serious safety problems for cyclists. If I ride up to a red light across conventional under-road sensors, often the sensors don't "see" me. I habitually wiggle the bike from side to side to increase the chance that I will be detected. This usually works. However under the new system, the light could turn amber just as I was passing the stop line, the system would not have "seen" me, and cars would start off on the cross road before I had had a chance to complete the crossing.

2. The idea that "the system can tell drivers that if they stick to a certain speed below the limit, they will find a succession of lights changing in their favour” sounds good in theory, but I doubt if it will work in practice. Take the A34 Kingsway in Burnage, South Manchester. The limit is 40, but most people realised that if they did just under 50, they would go through every light on green. The spacing of cross roads made this possible in both directions at this speed, and the phasing was adjusted to suit rush hour traffic. And just under 50 was a perfectly safe speed for that road. So Manchester Council decided to erect flashing signs saying "40 - slow down". Now enough people do exactly 40 that there is little if any chance of going through every light on green. So we all have to stop half way along.

3. The idea of controlling vehicle speed remotely keeps coming up, and is positively Orwellian. There have been cases where a car has started to pull out of a side road just as I was approaching it, and a quick burst of speed has got me past safely. If the system had immediately applied the brakes, I would probably have suffered a side on collision.

There are many improvements that can be made to traffic lights. However they must be carefully thought out first, and this proposal obviously hasn't been. One thing which could be done immediately would be to remove the red/amber phase. Very few countries still use this phase - not even the Irish Republic, I was surprised to find - and it serves no useful purpose. [I'm not sure if Switzerland and Germany still use it, but I can't think of any other European countries that ever did.] It was - I believe - originally introduced to allow drivers sufficient time to force the car into gear, so that they would be ready to proceed when the light went green. It should go the way of the licensing laws. Archaic, outdated nonsense.

_________________
Brian


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 17:18 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 15:14
Posts: 420
Location: Aberdeenshire
There are enough people now who's brains don't work fast enough to be ready to drive off at Green.

What would it be like if the "Wake Up Moron" red/amber was removed?

Ok so it only costs a few seconds, which is fine if you're at the front. Not so great when you're well back in a long queue and you have to wait through an extra cycle of the lights because some wally dithered around for an eternity on the green light.


Just a thought :?

I fully agree that I need and will remain to have full control over my speed. Remote speed control would be lethal and I one will be fitted to my car over my dead body.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 18:06 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 02:50
Posts: 2868
Location: Dorset
I like the red&amber, it gives you two chances to see that the lights are changing so reducing the possibility of not noticing and people behind getting annoyed. But it should usually be linked to the opposing amber light so there is no all-red annoyance phase.

Since when have traffic lights had anything to do with safety anyway? They are purely about control.

_________________
Andrew.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 21, 2006 22:05 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 14:04
Posts: 216
Location: Manchester
nedsram wrote:

2. The idea that "the system can tell drivers that if they stick to a certain speed below the limit, they will find a succession of lights changing in their favour” sounds good in theory, but I doubt if it will work in practice. Take the A34 Kingsway in Burnage, South Manchester. The limit is 40, but most people realised that if they did just under 50, they would go through every light on green. The spacing of cross roads made this possible in both directions at this speed, and the phasing was adjusted to suit rush hour traffic. And just under 50 was a perfectly safe speed for that road. So Manchester Council decided to erect flashing signs saying "40 - slow down". Now enough people do exactly 40 that there is little if any chance of going through every light on green. So we all have to stop half way along.


Nedsram, I actually live on this road albeit a bit further down in Didsbury. I have often noticed how I seem to be greeted at every junction with a red light - now I know why! I also have the great scenic view from my living room of a red light camera on one of the junctions :roll: Now that '40 - Slow Down' VAS thing is very annoying, esp on a road where up to 60 is safe. But I'd rather have that than a speed camera.

*Just realised what I'm saying here. I'm a local resident and should be campaiging for a 20mph limit, speed bumps and a speed camera every 50 yards on 'our' road.

_________________
Why can't we just use Common Sense?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 21, 2006 22:06 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 21:27
Posts: 247
Location: Near Stockport
Ziltro wrote:
I like the red&amber, it gives you two chances to see that the lights are changing so reducing the possibility of not noticing and people behind getting annoyed. But it should usually be linked to the opposing amber light so there is no all-red annoyance phase.


The point I was trying to make was that if it went green at the time it now goes red/amber, you would have a potential extra two seconds or so of "throughput". It works fine almost everywhere else in the world, so why not here?

One problem with red/amber is that people's brains seem to be programmed to expect it. When a green left arrow suddenly appears, often the lead driver doesn't register it, and somebody behind has to toot before he gets the message that the light has changed to green. Which seems to run counter to your argument.

The trend in my area recently, whenever traffic lights have been upgraded, has been to increase considerably the all-red period. If you asked, they would probably say that this was for "safety reasons".

_________________
Brian


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 21, 2006 22:11 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 21:27
Posts: 247
Location: Near Stockport
Nemesis wrote:
Just realised what I'm saying here. I'm a local resident and should be campaiging for a 20mph limit, speed bumps and a speed camera every 50 yards on 'our' road.


Yes that will solve everything. :evil:

_________________
Brian


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 21, 2006 23:41 
Offline
User

Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 21:19
Posts: 1059
60 on Kingsway, don't make me laugh...


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 00:02 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 14:04
Posts: 216
Location: Manchester
mpaton2004 wrote:
60 on Kingsway, don't make me laugh...


Why not? Kingsway's quite a long road. I'd agree most sections, most of the time 60 is not a good idea. But certain sections at certain times, 60 would be fine - there are long straight stretches with clear visibility.

_________________
Why can't we just use Common Sense?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 19:18 
Offline
User

Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 16:24
Posts: 322
Why do people jump lights in the first place? In my city they are so inefficient and cause so much congestion and disruption that people disregard and hate them. Arriving at the junction a second too late at my local junction can result in a five minute delay at rush hour, or one minute minimum in the early hours thanks to recent remodelling. As a result more people jump the lights than in the past when the lights were more efficient.

Make traffic lights more efficient. Switch them off outside of peak times. Don't install traffic lights on quiet local roads that don't need them.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 20:56 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 21:27
Posts: 247
Location: Near Stockport
sotonsteve wrote:
Make traffic lights more efficient. Switch them off outside of peak times.


Ever been to Lisieux? Last time we were there, they had switched all traffic lights to flashing amber (as do many other places in France outside peak times). Unlike here, there were give way or priority signs attached to the lights so that it was clear who had priority if the lights were on flashing amber. So people behaved as if it was a junction without traffic lights but with give way signs then? You have to be joking. It was absolute mayhem. :o

_________________
Brian


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 21:22 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 21:27
Posts: 247
Location: Near Stockport
Quote:
Nedsram, I actually live on this road albeit a bit further down in Didsbury. I have often noticed how I seem to be greeted at every junction with a red light - now I know why! I also have the great scenic view from my living room of a red light camera on one of the junctions :roll: Now that '40 - Slow Down' VAS thing is very annoying, esp on a road where up to 60 is safe. But I'd rather have that than a speed camera.


Nemesis, I know this is two years too late, but I just had to pick up on the fact that, soon after this discussion, they installed a northbound Gatso near Mauldeth Road. :evil:

_________________
Brian


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 21:37 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 21:41
Posts: 3608
Location: North West
nedsram wrote:
sotonsteve wrote:
Make traffic lights more efficient. Switch them off outside of peak times.


Ever been to Lisieux? Last time we were there, they had switched all traffic lights to flashing amber (as do many other places in France outside peak times). Unlike here, there were give way or priority signs attached to the lights so that it was clear who had priority if the lights were on flashing amber. So people behaved as if it was a junction without traffic lights but with give way signs then? You have to be joking. It was absolute mayhem. :o



Most of EU do this. I admit it seems to work very well.


We have noted that your area .. Manchester.. seems to have replaced red light cams with Redspeed /monitrons which our origin/pogo doo-dahs pick up and warn on :bow: to origin technologies - who are really rather good :bow:

By the way .. the gadget does not at all mean we "manipulate". it just lets us know in good time .. sufficient time to glance at the dash for the essential check over.. to double check as we have to do these days as a camera does not see what a real policeman or the fair minded professional one does. Jobsworthy idiots .. they exist. I admit that I can count these on hand's fingers from own experience... but the press "worry such tails as really wild felines worry the carcass of a gazelle :wink:"

_________________
If you want to get to heaven - you have to raise a little hell!

Smilies are contagious
They are just like the flu
We use our smilies on YOU today
Now Good Causes are smiling too!

KEEP SMILING
It makes folk wonder just what you REALLY got up to last night!

Smily to penny.. penny to pound
safespeed prospers-smiles all round! !

But the real message? SMILE.. GO ON ! DO IT! and the world will smile with you!
Enjoy life! You only have the one bite at it.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.044s | 12 Queries | GZIP : Off ]