Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Fri May 08, 2026 13:00

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Nov 15, 2009 18:58 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri May 27, 2005 15:13
Posts: 269
Admin - Topic was Story on the Daily Mail - they are causing accidents! moved from Safe Speed in the News and Media


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1227998/Speed-camera-rakes-500-000-year-blamed-doubling-motorway-casualties.html


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Nov 15, 2009 20:25 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 19:08
Posts: 3434
Overheard in essex road safety headquarters.

"So boys what do we put first, safety or the dosh?"

Answer...."Keep the box and take the money"....lol....;-)

_________________
My views do not represent Safespeed but those of a driver who has driven for 39 yrs, in all conditions, at all times of the day & night on every type of road and covered well over a million miles, so knows a bit about what makes for safety on the road,what is really dangerous and needs to be observed when driving and quite frankly, the speedo is way down on my list of things to observe to negotiate Britain's roads safely, but I don't expect some fool who sits behind a desk all day to appreciate that.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 26, 2009 00:19 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 02:17
Posts: 7357
Location: Highlands
I have moved this to here as Safe Speed was not quoted.

I have done a fair bit on this camera including radio interviews too.
It is utterly shameful what is happening here. With revenue this high and a direct accident created by distraction they ought to remove the camera for 4 years and see how the KSI settles down ...

Over-reliance on the camera system fails to address the real road safety messages and issues.
Article :
Daily Mail Reporter wrote:
Speed camera that rakes in £500,000-a-year blamed for doubling of motorway casualties
Last updated at 5:35 PM on 15th November 2009

A motorway speed camera responsible for earning the Government £500,000-a-year in fines has been blamed for increasing accidents since it was installed.
The camera, which monitors a busy stretch of the M11 in Essex, results in 9,000 tickets a year, but figures released by police show crashes have risen by a quarter at the site.
A Freedom of Information request made by campaigners who oppose what they see as revenue-based penalty tickets also showed casualties have almost doubled since 2001 when the camera was set up.
M11 junction4/5 southbound
Safety camera or money maker? The M11 Gatso in Essex at the centre of the controversy
Paul Pearson, who runs motoring website penaltychargenotice.co.uk, said: 'No wonder they haven't removed the camera that is causing these accidents.

'It is just raising too much money and they clearly want to keep it there.'
Essex Police, which runs the camera together with Essex Council and the Highways Agency, had initially refused a Freedom of Information request by Mr Pearson for details about the speeding tickets issued by the machine.
But after a ruling by the Information Commissioner, the police have been forced to disclose that in 2003 alone the M11 camera was responsible for 9,639 fines and a further 8,451 in 2004.
The following year 9,047 motorists were caught by the camera and in 2006 a total of 7,801 were sent fines. In 2007, the number fell to 3,305.
There are no complete figures for 2008, but in the year up to May 2009, the number of fines had risen to 6,445.
Mr Pearson has highlighted the danger he claims the camera poses, after he put in an earlier Freedom of Information request, having witnessed an accident on the road.

He said: 'The speed limit reduces from 70mph to 50mph without prior warning, the carriageway narrows from 3 to 2 lanes and just beyond is a speed camera.
'In February 2008 we witnessed the aftermath of a three-car pile up immediately in front of the camera.
'It was obvious that it was the camera that caused the accident because cars were having to reduce speed and merge and then of course some motorists slam on their brakes when they pass the camera.
'So we asked the Department of Transport for the accident and casualty statistics.'

The data showed that in the five years before the camera was installed, there were 13 accidents and 14 casualties in the area. In the following five years, the number of accidents rose to 16 and casualties to 24.
The Highways Agency said that the accident data for the spot, between junctions four and five on the southbound carriageway, did not show a pattern of accidents which would be consistent with the camera itself being a factor.
Police have blamed motorists who slow down ahead of the camera and then speed up once they are clear of it.
A spokesman for Essex police denied the camera was causing crashes.
He said it was not being kept for revenue reasons and that there were no plans to remove it.
He said that police recently added an extra 'speed indicator' sign that displayed approaching motorists' speeds before they reached the camera, in addition to camera warning signs and 50mph signs.
'Cameras do not cause collisions, poor driving does,' said the spokesman.

_________________
Safe Speed for Intelligent Road Safety through proper research, experience & guidance.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 252 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.016s | 12 Queries | GZIP : Off ]