I have investigated Gatso cameras for 3 years and can now prove they are unreliable evidence.The proof is displayed on YouTube
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VpaFOiQQSroIt`s very complicated to explain, but the fault with Gatsos being activated by oncoming traffic has been covered up by Gatso for obvious reasons, and the Home Office staff and police staff pretended they tested the cameras and the fault does not exist.These staff have since retired on big pensions.The fault does exist, but the police normally destroy photos showing no vehicles in the target zone, and send out NIP`s to everyone else knowing that they will probably pay up because they allege technology is foolproof.
It`s a scam, and if the photos are massively out of order they normally drop the case before it reaches Court because they can`t risk being proved wrong. They need the money from fines to pay for their big salaries and pensions,and will go to extreme lengths to deny the truth.You can`t blame them for their self interest.
I went to Court to defend a charge of 36mph but got fined over two hundred pounds, so I know the system is WRONG and feel justified in exposing the corruption and collusion.
Please see my videos, and advise Magistrates and your friends that, under some circumstances, a camera activation may NOT be actually caused by the vehicle in the photo zone.
The Magistrates must be brought to their senses by showing them this evidence, and they must discover a new perspective on police reliability and how they have been deceived in the past.
Best wishes, denny174