Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Sun May 17, 2026 10:19

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jul 27, 2011 23:57 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 02:17
Posts: 7357
Location: Highlands
STV TV Scotland - here
STV - Gavin Stuart wrote:
Report reveals speed cameras can reduce deaths by 63%
By Gavin Stuart - 27 July 2011 15:18 GMT
The positive effects of cameras on road safety have been highlighted by government figures.

Report reveals speed cameras can reduce deaths by 63%
Camera: Majority of Scots support their use. Pic: © STV

Speed cameras can reduce the number of people killed or seriously injured on Scotland's roads by as much as 63%, government figures have revealed.
A report from the Scottish Safety Camera Programme found that traffic-related deaths and injuries had fallen from an average of 341 to 127 over the past three years at sites where fixed or mobile speed cameras were located.
The largest change was at mobile camera sites where the average number of people killed or seriously injured has fallen from 232 to 79 per year - a reduction of 66%.

Average speeds and the number of people exceeding the speed limit at safety camera sites are also generally lower following a period of enforcement, the report found.

Meanwhile, the number of people issued with a fixed penalty after being caught exceeding the speed limit or running a red-light at a safety camera site has halved in the last four years and reduced by over 60% in the past six years.

Nearly 70% of the 4010 respondents to the Scottish Crime and Justice Survey 2009-10 agreed that safety cameras help discourage dangerous driving and prevent accidents, while 80% think that people should see the use of road safety cameras as "a good thing".
And despite over half of motorists believing that cameras are "an easy way to make money," 76% of people agree with their use.

The report also found that females and those living in urban areas had the most favourable attitude towards cameras, while males and those living in rural locations tended to be less positive.
A survey taken by those that have everything to gain is hard;y unbiased, just to start with. 4K surveyed is not a great number and then how were they selected? Plus no one making any kind of policy decision should trust ignorant public opinion.
This is highly questionable reporting and press manipulation at it's best. The failure to appreciate never mind understand; RTTM, BoS, driver behaviour, even a vague appreciation of how accidents happen is entirely missing, traffic volume, traffic density, economics effectiveness on traffic and KSI, just for starters.

_________________
Safe Speed for Intelligent Road Safety through proper research, experience & guidance.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 28, 2011 00:27 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 18:54
Posts: 4036
Location: Cumbria
Interesting that the biggest drops are at mobile camera sites! (given that the mobile cameras won't always be there!) Kind of suggests that the massive improvements claimed are actually largely random. You'd have expected the biggest improvements to be at the fixed camera sites (because they're more visible and always there). Of course, that does work on the assumption that the reason for the improvement is people slowing down... :wink:


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 68 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.028s | 10 Queries | GZIP : Off ]