Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Thu Aug 06, 2026 02:13

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Jun 28, 2005 12:14 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2004 13:36
Posts: 1339
http://www.londonspeedcameras.com/news.asp?id=110

Quote:
The cameras should track drivers as they drive through a section of road covered by a 20 mph speed limit, this is in place to protect vulnerable road users during road works while the lanes are narrowed. However, the cameras has [sic] been positioned so that it [sic] start monitoring drivers while they are still in the 30mph speed limit.


There are a lot of potential perjury issues here. They must have known. It's not exactly hard to spot if a camera for a 20 zone is actually inside a 30 limit.

Quote:
Due to the calibration of the cameras all of the motorists who have received a fixed penalty notice must have been breaking the speed limit at some point in the cameras enforcement area. However, the LSCP has decided to cancel all of the tickets, repay the fines and rescind the penalty points.


Could this 'decision' of theirs have something to do with the fact that a case has just been dismissed by magistrates? So hardly their decision to make at all. This allegation also ignores the findings on Pepipoo that the 20 zone was not valid anyway as it doesn't have traffic calming.

Quote:
What about people who have had their insurance premium affected by points on their licence?
People affected will have to take the issue up with their insurers


Wrong. Victims can sue the bastards for negligence.

Quote:
How many have gone to court?
237 cases went to court – we don’t believe any of these resulted in a loss of licence


Note the careful wording. They seem very well informed on every other minor detail, but somwhow this is only a matter of 'belief'.

Quote:
“Although our records show that each of these motorists were in excess of either speed limit at some point within the area, including the area they may have thought was a 30mph limit, the LSCP will refund all of the fines paid and will cancel all of the licence endorsements.


Same kind of thing again. They're all just repeating the same party line. Anyway, what does he/she mean 'thought was a 30 limit'? It was a 30 limit! Why do they come out with this blame shifting garbage spin every time?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 29, 2005 10:09 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 16:34
Posts: 923
Location: UK
Zamzara wrote:

Quote:
How many have gone to court?
237 cases went to court – we don’t believe any of these resulted in a loss of licence


Note the careful wording. They seem very well informed on every other minor detail, but somwhow this is only a matter of 'belief'.


Out of 237 cases going to court it would be almost certain that several people would have lost their licences - firstly several of them would have been on nine points and got three points, secondly some of them would have been given six points due to the alleged high speed, lastly some of them might have alleged to have been going such a terribly high speed (over 40) that they were given a short term ban.

Gareth


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 251 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.037s | 11 Queries | GZIP : Off ]