Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Wed May 27, 2026 04:59

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Aug 09, 2005 15:27 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 09:16
Posts: 3655
Quote:
A SENIOR children's doctor banned from driving for his fourth speeding offence has failed in a bid to win back his licence.

Consultant paediatrician Dr Robert Moy claimed the six-month disqualification imposed by Solihull magistrates would cause "exceptional hardship" to his patients, an appeal at Warwick Crown Court heard.

The Birmingham Children's Hospital doctor, 54, of Knightlow Road, Harborne, had been fined £100 and ordered to pay £35 costs by magistrates, who rejected the exceptional hardship submission and banned him under the totting-up procedure.

During Dr Moy's appeal Andrew Tucker, prosecuting, said that in April there was a temporary 40mph speed limit on a stretch of the A45 Coventry Road, near Old Damson Lane, but a speed camera caught the doctor doing 51mph in his Peugeot.

Richard Faux, for Dr Moy, said: "It would be right to find exceptional hardship, not only because of the effect it would have on Dr Moy but the effect it will have on his patients."

Giving evidence Dr Moy said he was a consultant community paediatrician based at Birmingham Children's Hospital but conducted clinics and saw patients " in community situations throughout Birmingham".

He said that as well as having to get to the clinics, he also had to transport confidential medical notes and equipment weighing a total of up to 20 kilos.

Because of the ban he had to rely on taxis paid for by the primary health care trust, which could cause delays, especially on a Wednesday when he had to do one clinic and go back to his office before going on to a second.

He added that he was also on call every Wednesday for child protection issues at the children's hospital.

Rejecting the appeal against the driving ban and ordering the doctor to pay a further £275 costs, Judge James Pyke said: "We are not certain that some compromise arrangement could not be made where a vehicle could be made available on those occasions when it is most particularly required.

"We do not believe the hardship in this case qualifies as exceptional hardship."


Obviously the medical profession is not as over stretched as the police force….go figure

here is the source for info...
http://icbirmingham.icnetwork.co.uk/0100news/0100localnews/tm_objectid=15837093&method=full&siteid=50002&headline=doc-s-bid-to-lift-driving-ban-fails-name_page.html

_________________
Speed camera policy Kills


Last edited by Gizmo on Wed Aug 10, 2005 07:07, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 09, 2005 18:40 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member

Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2004 13:50
Posts: 2643
They want their pound of flesh, and the blood as well.

Cheers
Peter

_________________
Only when ideology, prejudice and dogma are set aside does the truth emerge - Kepler


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 10, 2005 05:05 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
The case of this thread is refered to in our PR:
http://www.safespeed.org.uk/forum/viewt ... 8328#38328

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 10, 2005 13:17 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 14:26
Posts: 4364
Location: Hampshire/Wiltshire Border
Contrast this to the report in today's Southampton Echo where the Chief Executive of the Southampton University Hospitals NHS Trust was spared a ban under totting up because of the "challenging time" he was having running the Trust. He was given 3 points for 38mph in a 30 limit on camera.

The Trust is in huge defecit and received only one star rating.

He could easily use public transport or get a driver or taxi if he needed to.

_________________
Malcolm W.
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not represent the views of Safespeed.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 12, 2005 13:46 
Offline
User

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 12:33
Posts: 770
Location: Earith, Cambs
If the Doc in question decided to quit this country, go to work in the USA (thus doubling his income), deprive the HNS of a good doctor and let the Daily Mail know, that would really do some good. Imagine the comments from the parents of sick children whose various procedures had to be put back to later dates (think of the children!).
How stupid the Pratnership, the Magistrates and the Appeal Court would look (once again).
Would you blame him if he did emigrate?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.047s | 13 Queries | GZIP : Off ]