Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Wed Nov 12, 2025 18:19

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Left To DIE!
PostPosted: Wed Nov 16, 2005 01:12 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 21:41
Posts: 3608
Location: North West
Is the highly emotive headline of tonight's "Bolton Evening News" :roll:

A seventeen year old was run over by a "speeding driver" :roll: on Albert Road, Farnworth - close to the site where the 18 year old clipped the kerb on his scooter and died of head injuries - and think I put this on here somewhere :? at the time :?

The incident occurred at 11.30 pm on Saturday when the lad was walking a friend home. His friend dropped her mobile phone in the middle of the road and he went back to pick it up

Ah... we get to the truth - no insult intended to the lad - but it seems to me that more importance is attached to these damned things than life itself.. Fancy wanting to be buried with the wretched thing... My idea of hell someone phoning me all the time.


As the lad stooped to pick up the phone - he was struck by a driver who failed to stop. The lad (who is recovering at home said the driver was on the wrong side of the road.... :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: Does not remember anything but the sight of the car as it approached him. :(

Now - cannot and will not condone driver for running from the scene and failing to report, nor if he really was on the wrong side of the road can anyone defend.

However, given the lad received per the paper report mild concussion, cuts and bruises - this car could not have been "speeding" as a hit at 30 mph or even 25 mph against a chap bending to pick something up would have given a fatal blow to the head as head would be closer to the ground given he was stooping to pick up a small telephone. : roll:

So - under the circumstance - driver not guilty of speeding but guilty of colliding with another, failing to stop and report. Perhaps at that time - may have run because of a drink or no insurance/MOT or may have been on 9 points even - and thus panicked.

The parents claimed that cars failed to slow down despite police cars and ambulances with flashing lights. Now that I just do NOT believe! That is shock talking! :?

Police believe the car to be a Rover and urge anyone with any information to call the traffic unit at 0161 856 7273

_________________
If you want to get to heaven - you have to raise a little hell!

Smilies are contagious
They are just like the flu
We use our smilies on YOU today
Now Good Causes are smiling too!

KEEP SMILING
It makes folk wonder just what you REALLY got up to last night!

Smily to penny.. penny to pound
safespeed prospers-smiles all round! !

But the real message? SMILE.. GO ON ! DO IT! and the world will smile with you!
Enjoy life! You only have the one bite at it.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 16, 2005 01:40 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 01:42
Posts: 686
The driver's crime here is that he committed a "hit & run". There could be numerous reasons why he did this - no insurance, no licence, under the influence of drink/drugs, car taken without consent, etc.

Why bring speed into it at all?

_________________
“For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.” - H. L. Mencken


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 16, 2005 08:23 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 15:05
Posts: 1225
Location: Glasgow
antera309 wrote:
The driver's crime here is that he committed a "hit & run". There could be numerous reasons why he did this - no insurance, no licence, under the influence of drink/drugs, car taken without consent,


...and why precisely is it that, despite all the wonderful detection technology now in place to 'ease the burden' (ie. replace) the traffic police they still cannot track down said vehicle.....?

:x


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 16, 2005 16:13 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 01:42
Posts: 686
r11co wrote:
antera309 wrote:
The driver's crime here is that he committed a "hit & run". There could be numerous reasons why he did this - no insurance, no licence, under the influence of drink/drugs, car taken without consent,


...and why precisely is it that, despite all the wonderful detection technology now in place to 'ease the burden' (ie. replace) the traffic police they still cannot track down said vehicle.....?

:x


It must be keeping within the speed limits.

_________________
“For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.” - H. L. Mencken


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.018s | 12 Queries | GZIP : Off ]