stevemcol wrote:
Hobbes. You're not prone to knee jerk reactions then!
Can't imagine such a device would be launched if it wasn't robust*. I'll certainly wait until I've seen the finshed article before I go off on one.
Anything has to be better than steep solid bumps
No, I'm not particularly prone to knee jerk reactions. I'm just saying that if there exists a way of breaking something....it'll be found & exploited.
The ONLY reason normal speed humps 'work' is they are just immovable lumps with no moving parts (unless you own a JCB

). Drivers themselves may not do the attacking, but local kids/yob element will undoubtedly get their kicks from it. I've seen 10's of thousands of pounds worth of damage done to the new bus shelters in my city, (several HUNDRED panels of toughened safety glass about 4'x4' at 15mm thick), and thousands of pounds worth of new trees snapped for the hell of it....and these things "just sit there", but because they CAN be damaged - they automatically WILL be.
Even if it's not a burstable 'bladder' arrangement, and it uses pneumatic pistons to hinge/raise/lower the hump the potential for destruction is there!
If it moves, it new or novel....and the public have access to it....yup, it'll be broken.
Cynic? Moi?
*Many things are launched without being fully tested. eg. The LTi 20/20

...Mr Gates' software.....everything requiring a 'product recall'....etc etc