Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Tue Apr 21, 2026 06:26

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Oct 13, 2006 18:17 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2005 19:50
Posts: 3369
Location: Lost in the Wilderness
Daily Telegraph

Quote:
Old Minis 'most vulnerable' in a crash
By David Millward, Transport Correspondent
(Filed: 13/10/2006)

The driver of an old-style Mini is 14 times more likely to be killed or injured in a two-car crash than somebody behind the wheel of a four-wheel drive such as a Land Rover or Isuzu Trooper, according to figures released by the Department for Transport.

Its study, based on examining the consequences of 67,000 crashes between 2000 and 2004, shows that motorists in small cars run a greater risk than those in larger models.

But while the DfT research is based on real accidents - rather than laboratory tests as carried out in the Euro NCAP surveys - the Department said the survey should be treated with caution.

"It does not address issues of primary safety and gives no information on whether or not specific makes of car have different risks of being involved in an accident," the DfT noted.

According to the study six per cent of drivers of small sports cars involved in a crash with another vehicle were killed or seriously injured, with the lowest percentage being four per cent in a BMW Z3 and the highest seven per cent in the Toyota MR2 1990 to 1995 version.

The average for small cars was seven per cent with the old version of the Mini faring worst with 14 per cent of drivers in two-vehicle accidents being either killed or seriously hurt.

On the other hand those behind the wheel of a Citroen fared best with only three per cent sustaining serious or fatal injuries.

Four wheel drive cars had the best record with three per cent of drivers dying or being injured in two vehicle accidents.

People carriers and large cars came next with four per cent, medium cars scored five per cent, while small-medium cars showed six per cent of drivers being killed or injured after an accident.

_________________
Useless laws weaken necessary laws.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 13, 2006 18:24 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 23:09
Posts: 6737
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
Also reported in The Times here:

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0, ... 89,00.html

This says:

Quote:
DRIVERS of small and medium-sized cars are 50 times more likely to be killed in collisions with another car than drivers of 4x4s or people-carriers, according to the Department for Transport.

It will give people a further reason to buy a 4x4 :o

_________________
"Show me someone who says that they have never exceeded a speed limit, and I'll show you a liar, or a menace." (Austin Williams - Director, Transport Research Group)

Any views expressed in this post are personal opinions and may not represent the views of Safe Speed


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 13, 2006 18:34 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 21:10
Posts: 1693
PeterE wrote:
Also reported in The Times here:

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0, ... 89,00.html

This says:

Quote:
DRIVERS of small and medium-sized cars are 50 times more likely to be killed in collisions with another car than drivers of 4x4s or people-carriers, according to the Department for Transport.

It will give people a further reason to buy a 4x4 :o


I wonder if there is enogh data to see whether this still holds true if *both* vehicles are 4x4's?

_________________
"The road to a police state is paved with public safety legislation"


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 13, 2006 18:46 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
There's a strong bias in the survey method - they only have data for crashes that involve injury, then they look at relative likelihood of driver injury.

I'm unsure of the nature of the bias that this introduces. (Still thinking about it.)

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 13, 2006 21:21 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 09:16
Posts: 3655
The old shape mini was taken out of production because it did not meet modern crash testing. It was given a stay of execution because some of the laws did not apply to existing platform, but eventualy it caught up.

By modern standards it is a death trap.

_________________
Speed camera policy Kills


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 13, 2006 21:30 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 23:09
Posts: 6737
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
Gizmo wrote:
The old shape mini was taken out of production because it did not meet modern crash testing. It was given a stay of execution because some of the laws did not apply to existing platform, but eventualy it caught up.

By modern standards it is a death trap.

Yes, no other cars of a 1950s design were kept in production anywhere near so long.

_________________
"Show me someone who says that they have never exceeded a speed limit, and I'll show you a liar, or a menace." (Austin Williams - Director, Transport Research Group)

Any views expressed in this post are personal opinions and may not represent the views of Safe Speed


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 13, 2006 23:35 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 00:15
Posts: 5232
Location: Windermere
PeterE wrote:
Gizmo wrote:
The old shape mini was taken out of production because it did not meet modern crash testing. It was given a stay of execution because some of the laws did not apply to existing platform, but eventualy it caught up.

By modern standards it is a death trap.

Yes, no other cars of a 1950s design were kept in production anywhere near so long.

Not even the VW Beetle? :shock:

_________________
Time to take responsibility for our actions.. and don't be afraid of speaking out!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 14, 2006 19:34 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 09:16
Posts: 3655
Ernest Marsh wrote:
Not even the VW Beetle? :shock:


The German built Beetle lasted 40 years (38 to 78) the mini went from 59 to 2001.

_________________
Speed camera policy Kills


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 14, 2006 20:29 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 21:10
Posts: 1693
Gizmo wrote:
Ernest Marsh wrote:
Not even the VW Beetle? :shock:


The German built Beetle lasted 40 years (38 to 78) the mini went from 59 to 2001.


I thought beetles were manufactured rather more recently in Mexico.

Also, what was the "Production run" for the 2CV?

_________________
"The road to a police state is paved with public safety legislation"


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 14, 2006 20:34 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 23:09
Posts: 6737
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
Perhaps it could be rephrased as the old Mini was the only car of 1950s design that survived in production long enough (and on the UK market) to make it through to the era of NCAP crash testing.

I wouldn't reckon much to my chances of survival in a 2CV :o

_________________
"Show me someone who says that they have never exceeded a speed limit, and I'll show you a liar, or a menace." (Austin Williams - Director, Transport Research Group)

Any views expressed in this post are personal opinions and may not represent the views of Safe Speed


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 14, 2006 23:26 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
PeterE wrote:
Perhaps it could be rephrased as the old Mini was the only car of 1950s design that survived in production long enough (and on the UK market) to make it through to the era of NCAP crash testing.



OR perhaps those driving MINIs had the sense (AND SKILL) TO AVOID getting into head ons with bigger things.
Peter seems to think that driving skills only came after the demise of the Mini - Sorry - in those days we had peeps called Trafpols to keep us in line --
Get naughty ---those blokes in not so well marked cars would descend on you( like a ton of bricks) and give you the "Acid lecture " as defined by a certain police member on ere -these days due to political correctness/human rights IG and friends need to have stripes in the right places - those days - they only neded a blue light--

_________________
lets bring sanity back to speed limits.
Drivers are like donkeys -they respond best to a carrot, not a stick .Road safety experts are like Asses - best kept covered up ,or sat on


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 14, 2006 23:32 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 23:09
Posts: 6737
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
botach wrote:
Peter seems to think that driving skills only came after the demise of the Mini - Sorry - in those days we had peeps called Trafpols to keep us in line --

Not at all, and indeed the ability to avoid crashes remains far more important than the protection against them.

(I know we've had a spat, mate, but I think we agree on 90%+ of the message)

For a vision of a society where "crash protection" is taken to the ultimate,
see:

http://members.aol.com/redbarche/ANiceMorningDrive.html

_________________
"Show me someone who says that they have never exceeded a speed limit, and I'll show you a liar, or a menace." (Austin Williams - Director, Transport Research Group)

Any views expressed in this post are personal opinions and may not represent the views of Safe Speed


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 16, 2006 10:24 
Offline
User

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 12:33
Posts: 770
Location: Earith, Cambs
As an ardent fan of the 'real' Mini, it is obvious that if your are hit by a heavier vehicle at any sort of apeed, you will be more vulnerable in the Mini because the distance from you to the impacting metal object will clearly be much less. Structurally the Mini has high torsional rigidity and, for its size, it's very strong, but the design advances since 1958 are obvious. I think the same applies to the Beetle really, it's just that the Beetle is slightly bigger.
The advantage of the Mini has always been its agility and thus the capability of 'steering around' potential accidents which a heavy 4x4 would just plough into.
But then, I guess I'm biased really.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 16, 2006 13:02 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 16:12
Posts: 1040
Location: West Midlands
The first person that I knew who was killed on the road was driving a mini, which was a relatively new (old) one at the time. Found himself on the wrong side of the road (cannot remember if I ever knew why - possibly steering around a potential accident) and the oncoming vehicle tore it into little pieces with him still in it (around the potential accident and into a real one).


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 16, 2006 14:18 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 21:10
Posts: 1693
PeterE wrote:
Perhaps it could be rephrased as the old Mini was the only car of 1950s design that survived in production long enough (and on the UK market) to make it through to the era of NCAP crash testing.

I wouldn't reckon much to my chances of survival in a 2CV :o


I remember some years ago seeing a report on KSI's for occupants by vehcle .

Not surprisingly the 2CV didnt come out too well IIRC the fatality rate was 40% :shock: . By contrast the fatality rate for the XJ40 (Which was the best performer, interestingly enough) was 2%

_________________
"The road to a police state is paved with public safety legislation"


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 16, 2006 20:19 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
Quote:
(I know we've had a spat, mate, but I think we agree on 90%+ of the message)


More like 100% --- accidents are caused - look at the causes - learn and put into practice.(BTW - PAX :drink: ( I'm not driving tomorrow))

Now years ago as a uni student ( peeps going -shock/shock) --i visited the Imp plant at Linwood --at the Q & A session afterwards i raised the Q about front end safety ( now bear in mind that some time previous we had had friends burnt up with one survivor -got out through the rear window ) after being shunted into the rear of a car in a multi shunt

My Question " how much front end protection do you build in , bearing in mind that the fuel tank is in the front end" --
Answer -"We do not design cars to crash" ( or words similar )

Mind you this was in the late 60' s.


Now how would this car fare today - i drove one in the late 70's - good road holding, lovely engine - brakes- please pass the anchor ( and that was compared to a Austin Maxi)

_________________
lets bring sanity back to speed limits.
Drivers are like donkeys -they respond best to a carrot, not a stick .Road safety experts are like Asses - best kept covered up ,or sat on


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 16, 2006 20:43 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 21:10
Posts: 1693
Rewolf wrote:
The first person that I knew who was killed on the road was driving a mini, which was a relatively new (old) one at the time. Found himself on the wrong side of the road (cannot remember if I ever knew why - possibly steering around a potential accident) and the oncoming vehicle tore it into little pieces with him still in it (around the potential accident and into a real one).


When I first started driving my parents were *concerned* that I might get a mini!

So to preclude this they gave me a Mk4 Zodiac! :lol:

(Nice car actually Id love to get another one!)

A few years later My younger brother got an old XJ12!

Of course this was all back in the dark ages when insurance was "sensible" My premium for TPT&T (for a student) was comparable to one-two weeks of an average starting wage!

_________________
"The road to a police state is paved with public safety legislation"


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 16, 2006 22:21 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 18:54
Posts: 4036
Location: Cumbria
I guess a lot depends on the nature of the accident. Obviously, there are no points for guessing that big heavy cars do better than small light cars in vehicle-to-vehicle impacts!

I think the old Mini was pretty bad (though not necessarily in the context of its peers) largely because of the hard steering wheel and rigid column. Obviously, the lack of much crumple zone didn't help and side impact protection wasn't really there.

They were, however, great fun to drive - especially the rubber suspension ones!

I often wonder about the Beetle and the Imp though. One great thing about a front-engined car in a forward crash into a rigid object is that as soon as the engine & gearbox hit the wall, they cease to become part of the car's mass. That makes the what's left of the car easier to stop before too much more crumpling has taken place. Obviously, in a rear-engined car, the weight of the engine & transmission is still pushing it into the wall for the whole duration of the crash!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 19, 2006 19:08 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
Mole - your bit about the Imp - that was the car i was talking about - whole family wiped out -petrol tank exploded, car on fire , doors wedged shut - one small person got out of rear window.

One other bit of history - Mini - 1959-2001.
Austin & Morris Mini 1959 - 1970 (circa) ---became MINI in tht year - mine bought new in 1970 (H plate ) had MINI on the bonnet ,not Austin/Morris.Were two others about - Riley Elf and Wolseley Hornet ---both sported twin carbs and lots of extras.Then there was the clubman.Possibly others - over to you Cooperman.

And just to make Cooperman drool ---


Look at this site

http://www.miniman.com/


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 19, 2006 20:10 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 02:50
Posts: 2868
Location: Dorset
It's nice to see my C3 listed as one of the safer ones. Now I know I won't have to pay as much attention to the road... :twisted:

_________________
Andrew.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 358 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.034s | 10 Queries | GZIP : Off ]