Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Sat Apr 04, 2020 02:43

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Nov 11, 2007 11:23 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2005 19:50
Posts: 3369
Location: Lost in the Wilderness
Page two of the sun.

Quote:
Motorist face 6pts for speed
By George Pascoe-Watson

A PLAN to ban seeding drivers after just two offences triggered outrage last night.
Road safety minister Jim Fitzpatrick believes a new sliding scale in fines and penalty points will cut road deaths.
He wants the current three penalty points doubled for going over 45mph in a 30mph zone or doing 90mph on a motorway.
Drivers would be automatically banned for six months after two convictions. And the £60 fine would rise to £100.
But drivers’ groups say it is wrong to target drivers doing 90mph on a clear motorway.

Paul Smith of Safe Speed fumed: “Road safety depends on drivers adjusting their speed to suit the conditions and this behaviour must be encouraged not denied.
“Drivers will rightly be concerned. Road safety efforts must be concentrated on real causes of road dangers.
“the pretending must stop. The lies must stop”
More than 1.1 million drivers have six or more points on their licences. They could be banned after just one more offence under the new system. The only good news is those just over the limit get a two point penalty.

_________________
Useless laws weaken necessary laws.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 11, 2007 23:59 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 22:19
Posts: 23
It'll cut road deaths overall because eventually no bugger will be using them.

Road deaths per 1000miles will however stay the same.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 10:37 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2004 19:19
Posts: 1050
except they are not planning to implement the reduced penalty for being just over. The DfT already announced in the consultation plans that they do not expect the reduction to be popular in the consultation.

talk about interfering with the consultation.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.327s | 13 Queries | GZIP : Off ]