Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Fri Jun 26, 2026 05:36

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Jul 21, 2005 19:27 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member

Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 15:49
Posts: 393
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/wilt ... 704617.stm

Claim cameras do not cut crashes

The Association of British Drivers (ABD) has made new claims that cameras have not helped reduce crashes along a stretch of the M4 in Wiltshire.
The ABD paid Wiltshire police for accident statistics and found excessive speed was a factor in 14% of crashes.

Previously the Wiltshire and Swindon Safety Camera Partnership (WSSCP) said cameras had reduced crashes by 64%.

Paul Smith, of the independent Safe Speed campaign said the WSSCP claims did not make sense.

Data interpretation

"There is absolutely no mechanism by which their claims could be true," said Mr Smith.

"Far from making the roads safer, cameras have damaged the foundations of British road safety by squandering massive resources on a minor safety factor."

Data supplied to the Department for Transport for the seven specific collision cluster sites on the M4 showed out of the 90 collisions analyzed, 16 (17.77%) were specifically caused by speeding, according to the officer at the scene.

A further 51 were judged to have speed as a causing factor (either inappropriate or excessive speed) and the remaining 23 collisions were not speed related.

Based on this, the WSSCP said: "Therefore out of the 90 collisions examined, 74% were judged to have excess speed or inappropriate speed as a causation factor."

Paul Smith disagrees with the partnership's interpretation of the data.

"Excessive speed is not the same as exceeding a speed limit," he said. "It includes speed inappropriate for the conditions as well as speed in excess of the speed limit."


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2005 16:31 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2004 19:19
Posts: 1050
STATEMENT

ISSUED ON BEHALF OF THE WILTSHIRE AND SWINDON SAFETY CAMERA PARTNERSHIP (WSSCP)

Swapped for a link due to their copywrite policy - which is not enforcable anyway..

http://www.safetycameraswiltshire.co.uk ... ?newsid=90


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2005 16:55 
Offline
Former Police Officer
Former Police Officer
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 00:27
Posts: 351
I am really confused by Wiltshire scameras release,

Scamera gits in Wiltshire wrote:
The data supplied to the DfT for approval of the 7 specific collision cluster sites on the M4 motorway, showed that out of the 90 collisions analyzed, 16 (17.77%) were specifically stated by the officer at the scene, as having excess speed as the causation factor. A further 51 were judged to have speed as a causation factor (either inappropriate or excessive speed) and the remaining 23 collisions were not speed related


So what they are saying is that they frigged the figures by adding an extra 51 accidents to the excess speed catagory. Surely that can't be right, what am I missing.

_________________
Former Military Police Officer and accident investigator


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.056s | 12 Queries | GZIP : Off ]