Right Richard then - let's be having yo9ur credentials then
Me? Have very good class degree in Maths and Physics from a top Uni - UMIST - and joined
as family tradition more or less.
Did dally with alternaive but got hooked on prospect of improving my driving and making an impact on security andbeiung useful to my fellow man!
I trained at Hendon and emerged from course with some accolades and pats on back - and to date have worked drugs/porn/traffic and ma trained in firearms as well.
So let's be hearing your expertise then - armchair road safety expert
who collects newspaper cuttings on a website as far as I can find - none of which have been "peer reviewed" as they are after all - the
opinion of a journalist
So please - no disrepect but I have looked at your site in entirety now and not discovered any mind numbing "peer reviewed article on road safety on there" so far.
Sorry if I sound blunt - but you really do have no idea about road safety in your ivory tower up there. I don't do "academic" - I do "enforcing law fair and square" and one of my vows as rookie was to "protect the public" - and I still take this very very seruiously. But armchair academics who "peer review" and arrogantly refuse to read real life anecdotes unless some academic has "peer reviewed it" have no idea as to what really goes on - do they?
Listen mate - I have now spent over 25 years as
and actually enjoyed my career to date. So much so that I do not want to retire even though I have the service record to do so. I'm still a "young "man with plenty to offer - and they wish to retain me!
Now - I've lost count of the numenr of incidents which caused mytrather queasy stomach to get the better of me on a clear up - and 90% of hese have not been down to
speed bit more to a lack of driver judgement and I would say that one of more element of COA ST was missing .
By the way COAST per DIS/SPEED AWARE courses will feature soon enough in ytour accredited \"Accident Prevention Analysis " doo -dah as it is a police/safety partnerhsip initiatiive and so far [i[ all evidence to date shows we are correct in this project [/i]
I aslo note you fail to recognise the piece on Durham and N Yorks in this peer reviewed tome you are so anxious to see safepeed within
Oh - no speed cameras too - and we get a plaudit there....
How odd and we do it without cameras too.. now there's a novel thought!
Well - we do without fixed ones - - ummmm - - er what' s in the cars ... er - um
secret
and then we have a cam van
- but heck - we use our professional judgement - and guess what - our public don't "hate us" and actually help us fight crime as a result Well I never -
what a quaint old fashioned concept - eh?:
Quote:
you advertise appliances intended to undermine a major national safety system, and thousands use it to justify their individual campaigns to destroy public property and safety systems.
I am not bothered about useful gadgets - use an origin myself if in strange Kodak territory
If they help folk comply and drive safely - no issues whatsoever. A Wildy pointed out to you - they are "useful" - same as driving to my C O A S T helps a dirver be hazard aware?
You think I give this COAST tip for the fun of it ?
Forms part of DIS and Speed aware basis - and about to appear in your lovely accredited journal!
So prove me, John Lyons, Paul Ripley, John Franklin and police trainers wrong when they suggest concentrating, observing, anticipating and allowing space and time - and bear in mind all these authors have been "peer reviewed" by the journal you hold so close to your heart here!
Speed cameras rather undermine by making people believe they are safe so long as they adhere to the lollipop. = per speed cam folk. Yeah - OK so tell that to person we've scraped up NOT speeding in frezing fog, ice, snow then or to the drunk pedestrian we sent ot the morgue last week!
I'd rather a real safety message any day of the week . But even so - tell me how we do keep it safe without forests of your peer reviewed scams and how hinset cops on patrol do a much beter job?
.
Basically mate - could not give a stuff about any peer review - I'm more concerned with getting a safety message across and I do so via this site and the Swiss have passed this on elsewhere!
Speed is just one isolated issue - but you can have fatals at low speeds - and I've scraped these up -Richard - so do NOT dare bleat on at me about speed being a lkiller - BAD DRIVING practices KILL and I will admit that bad choice of speed or even unaweareness of speed or power of the vehicle all contribute to this - and Ian , Stephen, Dutch are more than aware of this - unlike yourself in your academic ivory tower. Real world training counts and I am more than convinced all "peer reviewed
trained at sharp edge Bib would back me on this!
Quote:
The issue for me is less about being pro- or anti- [insert contentious issue here], although I do have a view on the particular issue of speed cameras. I am, however, very suspicious of anyone who promotes civil disobedience.
Where on this site does this feature -
guy's not about abolishing speed limits and - forum jokey banter apart - not seen any such promotion on here and anyone who does - getrs full blast of my temper and my mate Riggers backs me on this.
But guy is merely pointing out that speed cameras are not a cure all and there is a very real danger that this government has been led down garden path by loony lefty peer reviewers from questionable "new" unis.