Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Sun Jan 25, 2026 16:31

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 50 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 18, 2005 13:24 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Thu May 19, 2005 22:21
Posts: 925
fergl100 wrote:
The tanker driver may not have been speeding but he could still have been going too fast for the situation.


Yes he could have been driving to fast for the situation, but equally the car driver could have made a terrible misjudgement when deciding to pull out of the side road, and tragically paid the ultimate price.

I think it's important to avoid the knee-jerk reaction to appotion the blame to the tanker driver as careless right turns are a big cause of accidents. The tanker driver must have had to be going excessively fast for the driver not to have been able to clear it's path. That may have been what happened of course, but equally it may have been a mis-judged exit from the side road. Lastly it could even be a bit of both. With that however, both parties had an opportunity to avoid the accident. I believe the topic of having a second chance to avoid an accident has been discussed previously, and it should not be forgot.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 18, 2005 13:53 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2004 18:19
Posts: 90
Location: East Yorks
I think we've lost the way in this thread somewhat.
Safety should never be about apportioning blame. Indeed, apportioning blame acts, at best, as a smokescreen, and at worst as a barrier to improvements.

Safety should be about learning the lessons, and trying to ensure that accidents don't happen again, and better still, don't happen in the first place. I believe that was what Fergl100's original intent was.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 18, 2005 15:11 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 18:38
Posts: 396
Location: Glasgow
Yes you're right Teepee, my goal is to see if I can help make this junction safer using the resource of this forum, but I admit I do find myself apportioning blame to the tanker driver although capri was correct in all he said about the possibility of a misjudged pull out. Maybe I'm too close to the situation to be objective.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 18, 2005 22:38 
Offline
Camera Partnership Staff
Camera Partnership Staff
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2005 19:48
Posts: 1995
whatever the outcome of the accident investigation still a tragic event, a fatality, child lost its mother, husband lost his wife etc, the tanker driver if he was speeding or not will have to live with this for the rest of his life.

when i was still in the brigade going to an pi rta you could come across one car wrecked another hardly damaged yet people dead, forget my current role if a tanker even empty hits a car side on at 30mph then severe damage is caused, therefore less damage would be caused at 20mph

i passed my driving test at the third attempt i failed one on ANTICIPATION at a junction, should i go or wait, whether in work or not i pull out of a jct when i feel it is safe to, sod the car flashing me from behind, but i feel somewhat that todays drivers have no patience, respect for other road users only their own agenda

fergl do you have a lot of hgv's using the village, if yes get on to the local traffic managment dept within the police / council looking for alternative routes, vehicles under xx weight only allowed through the village unless for access

_________________
now retired


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 18, 2005 23:06 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 18:38
Posts: 396
Location: Glasgow
No we don't have a lot of through traffic, most large vehicles are there for access. I presume this tanker serviced local farms.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 20, 2005 13:21 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2004 14:04
Posts: 2325
Location: The interweb
How long / realistic was the drivers route and the time he had to complete it?

It wouldn't suprise me if he was under some pressure to get around as fast as possible.

Spoke to a delivery driver a couple of weeks ago. They have routes drawn up on Autoroute with no stopping time factored in at all.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 20, 2005 14:35 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 18:38
Posts: 396
Location: Glasgow
I don't know the schedule this driver was running to. He could of course not be under time restraint but just in a hurry to finish work early.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 20, 2005 16:25 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2005 16:30
Posts: 20
Location: northwales
and maybe the woman was trying to get home fast to put some tea on
for her family or the child in the car was a distraction.
I have seen lots of driver just see you and pull out.Its like you are not there.
Have given this a lot of thourgh and the only way to take out the danger is to put traffic lights in.
Vas signs do not work for someone local, as you get use to them.
Mirrors also dont work as you can look one way then the next and move off and before you now it bang.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 20, 2005 16:40 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member

Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2004 13:50
Posts: 2643
There are several things they can do to minimise the danger, any of which would be infinitely more effective than speed cameras / limits:

1) Put up clear and unambiguous warning signs

2) Install a chicane at the bend to force vehicles down to a crawl. This would, however, have the disadvantage of being 24:7, where an actual danger may only be present for a few minutes of the day. Not to be recommended for a busy road.

3) Install a mini-roundabout at the junction. Same disadvantages as the last point.

4) Prohibit right-turns out of the side-road.

5) Install 'on-demand' traffic lights which are visible, or signed, from before the bend.

_________________
Only when ideology, prejudice and dogma are set aside does the truth emerge - Kepler


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 21, 2005 14:05 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2004 14:04
Posts: 2325
Location: The interweb
Pete317 wrote:
1) Put up clear and unambiguous warning signs

Gets my vote if they don't already exist and there really is a problem with the layout which canot easily be put right.

Quote:
2) Install a chicane at the bend to force vehicles down to a crawl.

My experience of chicanes si that they do exactly the opposite. Drivers speed through in order to get past the obstruction before anyone coming the other way. They also focus drivers attention on one small patch of road. They can only make an accident more likely.

Quote:
3) Install a mini-roundabout at the junction. Same disadvantages as the last point.

This is slightly better than a chicane but would it have avoided this accident? It would appear the car driver pulled out without seeing the truck or without giving it room to stop. Can't see a mini roundabout making this less likely. Traffic on the main road will have a "my right of way" mentality approaching it.

Quote:
4) Prohibit right-turns out of the side-road.

This Idea I like. And if I lived in the street I would support it but how many people living there will?

Quote:
5) Install 'on-demand' traffic lights which are visible, or signed, from before the bend.

I think always on lights with road sensors would be another good solution but an expensive and possibly unsightly one.
I don't like part time lights at all. It is far too easy for someone to get used to them not being active then come through one day when they are and not have time to stop.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 21, 2005 14:22 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
Stepping back from the discussion and viewing it from the perspective of an advanced driver...

When the side road is close to a bend or other visual obstruction an advanced driver familar with the location might choose to use a different route.

If any of you are regularly concerned about the risk of a crash involving an approaching vehicle in one of these situations, my advice is to try and find an alternative route.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 21, 2005 16:03 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 09:59
Posts: 3544
Location: Shropshire
SafeSpeed wrote:
If any of you are regularly concerned about the risk of a crash involving an approaching vehicle in one of these situations, my advice is to try and find an alternative route.


Absolutely agree. There are a number of possible routes of of Albrighton onto the A41, one of which I don't use because of visibility difficulties. OTOH, when approaching this junction from along the A41, I give myself as much oipportunity as possible to accomodate someone emerging unsighted.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 21, 2005 17:53 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 18:38
Posts: 396
Location: Glasgow
SafeSpeed wrote:
Stepping back from the discussion and viewing it from the perspective of an advanced driver...

When the side road is close to a bend or other visual obstruction an advanced driver familar with the location might choose to use a different route.

If any of you are regularly concerned about the risk of a crash involving an approaching vehicle in one of these situations, my advice is to try and find an alternative route.


This is the only exit from a fairly large housing estate built in the70's. Unfortunately residents have no choice but to use it.

From all the suggestions I am guessing the council will favour a mini roundabout as they have just installed one in the neighbouring village. Whether this will be safe at this location I have my doubts. Stopping cars turning right from the junction sounds good but won't be implemented due to residents wanting to nip out to the co-op in the village centre. It is a tricky one.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 21, 2005 19:04 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member

Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2004 13:50
Posts: 2643
SafeSpeed wrote:
When the side road is close to a bend or other visual obstruction an advanced driver familar with the location might choose to use a different route.

If any of you are regularly concerned about the risk of a crash involving an approaching vehicle in one of these situations, my advice is to try and find an alternative route.


Agreed. But this doesn't help people who are not advanced drivers, nor those who are unfamiliar with the surroundings.

_________________
Only when ideology, prejudice and dogma are set aside does the truth emerge - Kepler


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 21, 2005 19:33 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
Pete317 wrote:
SafeSpeed wrote:
When the side road is close to a bend or other visual obstruction an advanced driver familar with the location might choose to use a different route.

If any of you are regularly concerned about the risk of a crash involving an approaching vehicle in one of these situations, my advice is to try and find an alternative route.


Agreed. But this doesn't help people who are not advanced drivers...


Well it might if advanced drivers had a decent channel of communication to the wider public. We might even be doing it here and now - someone reading this might have thought: "It's so easy when you think about it like that! - I'll go round the other way".

But I'd really like to see the government with its huge resources delivering such simple and intelligent messages to the wider public.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 25, 2005 15:43 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 19:41
Posts: 201
Location: North East Wales
Quote:
I have seen lots of driver just see you and pull out.Its like you are not there


Yesterday morning I was riding a bicycle to work. As I approached a minor road joining from the left from the local school, I saw a hatchback waiting to turn right at the stop line. The woman driving was not indicating ( no-one does anymore :x ) but her front wheels were turned towards me a few degrees. I looked at her face as I approached and she looked back but less than 2 bike lengths she just pulled out and stopped. I had anticipated something odd might happen and had slowed so I was able to swerve left so as to just miss her door (and avoid buckling my front wheel ) I was amazed that all the time she was apparently looking at me and only seemed surprised when she braked. I was too busy mounting s***** b**** and only thought of what was going through her mind afterwards. Was she asleep ? on medication ? totally preoccupied ? or looking through me to see if there was approaching traffic.

Just shows what bikers have to face everyday ! Have others experienced this ?

Oh and basingwerk ....how would a speed camera solve this ?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 25, 2005 19:48 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 21:17
Posts: 3734
Location: Dorset/Somerset border
Frequently, and in something much bigger than a bike, so you'd think the puller-outer would be a bit more careful.

And has anyone EVER pulled out, then gone quicker than you, rather than pull out and go really slowly?

I think once in fifteen years in my case.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 25, 2005 22:34 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
Johnnytheboy wrote:
Frequently, and in something much bigger than a bike, so you'd think the puller-outer would be a bit more careful.

And has anyone EVER pulled out, then gone quicker than you, rather than pull out and go really slowly?

I think once in fifteen years in my case.


Then I surmise that you are faster than most folk on the road... :wink:

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 26, 2005 00:38 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 21:17
Posts: 3734
Location: Dorset/Somerset border
I was doing about 85 on a dead straight A road about ten years ago.

An Aston Martin pulled out on me when I was almost on top of him.

I went to just steer round him, and he just vanished to the horizon.

Suffice to say, I was not cross.... 8-)

My point was that people that pull out too late tend to be the slow, inconsiderate, no-indicator ones, rather than the fast-but courteous Safespeed posting ones.

I freely admit I drive fast, but if I am in ANY DOUBT WHATSOEVER, I don't pull out on people.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 28, 2005 13:45 
Offline
User

Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 17:00
Posts: 169
Location: Leicester
Last Friday my daughter, a learner driver, was involved in a damage only accident when someone pulled out on her on a roundabout. She emergency braked (so did her instructor) and managed to avoid hitting the car that pulled out, but was rear ended by the car behind her.
I don't know whether the puller out didn't see my daughter or simply didn't want to be stuck behind a learner. And as a learner, she could hardly be expected to make allowances for the tailgater behind. In any case my daughter is said to be "almost ready for her test", so presumably isn't too slow. I was encouraged by a converstion I had with her last week, where I was talking to her about the importance of observation, and she said "my instructor is always going on about that too". Sounds like a good instructor. Anyway, perhaps this incident has brought it home to her (if it needed to be).

Add to that my wife's car being damaged in a car park because someone failed apply his handbrake when leaving his car, which then rolled into my wife's car, and the smash just up the road from my house where a blue Escort drove straight into the back of a stationary queue of traffic waiting at the traffic lights, at around 40mph without any attempt at braking, it has been quite a weekend.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 50 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.064s | 11 Queries | GZIP : Off ]