Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Mon Jan 26, 2026 00:57

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 68 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 29, 2006 12:36 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 09:01
Posts: 1548
Quote taken from the film clip.....
Quote:
In Dutch cities where traffic lights have been scrapped, there has been a 30% reduction in accidents


That is one hell of a reduction, what on earth are we waiting for?

_________________
What makes you think I'm drunk officer, have I got a fat bird with me?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 29, 2006 12:44 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2004 02:07
Posts: 242
In theory you would think that a man-controlled junction would be better because they can use their brains and regulate the traffic according to the conditions.

In practice that doesn't happen because I think that traffic passes through the junction a lot slower when it is man-controlled than when it is signal-controlled.

Best solution could be some TTLs humanly controlled by someone above having a look down at the road conditions.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 29, 2006 16:56 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 02:50
Posts: 2868
Location: Dorset
Earl Purple wrote:
And pedestrians object to bridges and subways unless the road is getting close to motorway standard.

Really? I don't mind them. Although it would be nice if they could keep the subways clean and bright. And it would be nice if you could shoot those drunk people who occasionally sit in them insulting you as you walk past to try and get you to give them money.

_________________
Andrew.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 29, 2006 18:31 
Offline
User

Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 16:24
Posts: 322
Ziltro wrote:
Earl Purple wrote:
And pedestrians object to bridges and subways unless the road is getting close to motorway standard.

Really? I don't mind them. Although it would be nice if they could keep the subways clean and bright. And it would be nice if you could shoot those drunk people who occasionally sit in them insulting you as you walk past to try and get you to give them money.


Local authorities don't like bridges and subways; they much prefer replacing them with toucan crossings :furious:


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 29, 2006 19:16 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 02:50
Posts: 2868
Location: Dorset
sotonsteve wrote:
Local authorities don't like bridges and subways; they much prefer replacing them with toucan crossings :furious:

Ick. Any crossings without flashing amber can f**k off. In my opinion. And I mean that in the politest way possible. :)

_________________
Andrew.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 14:11 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2004 02:07
Posts: 242
There is a footbridge crossing the North Circular Road at the junction with the A502 Brent Street / Golders Green Road, one of the few junctions on that road that actually has a traffic light as well.

Crossing on the bridge is safer and there have been accidents at that junction but crossing on the road is so much faster as the bridge has an enormously long spiral ramp. For me the alternative that would get me to want to use the bridge would be to start the ramp up some way up Brent Street and along Golders Green Road and the pavement is certainly wide enough for that. As the NCR is at the bottom of a hill from both directions in some ways it makes sense.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 14:29 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 10:30
Posts: 2053
Location: South Wales (Roving all UK)
Pedestrians dislike underpasses due to graffitti and vandalism etc, they dislike bridges as they have to climb up and down steps.

The problem with pedestrians is that they're like badgers and the like, they will go where they want to go and always have done. When I was building a big urban d/c in south wales they were a complete nuisance! Ignore the bridge, climb over the visi rail and go straight across the roundabout! (I'm probably the same mind).

In general though I think there is an over reliance on signal control. Roundabouts are great they represent a great intuitive solution.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 14:52 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
Earl Purple wrote:
In theory you would think that a man-controlled junction would be better because they can use their brains and regulate the traffic according to the conditions.

In practice that doesn't happen because I think that traffic passes through the junction a lot slower when it is man-controlled than when it is signal-controlled.

Best solution could be some TTLs humanly controlled by someone above having a look down at the road conditions.


I posted recently on a "personned - controlled junction" -- a PCSO - bloke who had a decent grasp of things - and with trafpol guidance would be excellent in time , and his dizzy assistant ( blonde of course) .
Now going back years/years/years to the days of PROPER trafpols with white armbands - qqqqq--- no such thing with these blokes - masters of their art ---as far as i am concerned - ONE GOOD TRAFPOL WITH WITE ARMBANDS ===50 SETS OF LIGHTS. I shout ---cause i've seen them in action and it's a pity some on here are too young to have seen them toooooo( so step up trafpol posters , that have directed and take a bow)

_________________
lets bring sanity back to speed limits.
Drivers are like donkeys -they respond best to a carrot, not a stick .Road safety experts are like Asses - best kept covered up ,or sat on


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 16:39 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 00:45
Posts: 1016
Location: Mighty Tamworth
I have noticed more, and more people jumping lights.
Something needs to be done, because it is dangerous.
People are seeing less vaule in them.

_________________
Oct 11 Birmingham Half Marathon. I am running for the British Heart Foundation.
http://www.justgiving.com/Rob-Taylor


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 17:42 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 02:50
Posts: 2868
Location: Dorset
ree.t wrote:
I have noticed more, and more people jumping lights.

Because there are too many red lights and people don't need to be controlled.
ree.t wrote:
Something needs to be done, because it is dangerous.

Hmm I've just thought of an intersting question. People say that but... Why is it dangerous to drive through a red light? I am of course assuming that you can see what is (or in most cases, isn't) coming the other direction.

_________________
Andrew.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 20:03 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 00:45
Posts: 1016
Location: Mighty Tamworth
Ziltro wrote:
Hmm I've just thought of an interesting question. People say that but... Why is it dangerous to drive through a red light? I am of course assuming that you can see what is (or in most cases, isn't) coming the other direction.


People are leaving later before they stop at red, ie when the other traffic is moving.

I think there is too many traffic lights, and they stop free flowing traffic, when there is no need to.

Example of pointless traffic lights is where the M6 Toll road crossed the A38 on the north of Birmingham. It is an NSL duel carriageway. However halfway along there is two roundabouts controlled by traffic lights. :roll: :?

Many times I have had to stop when there is no traffic.

I understand(ish) why people jump lights, as it is frustrating. However I believe it is dangerous because some people won't look properly, because of the traffic lights.
Also: I was at a set today, At a T junction. I was turning right and there was a car to on my left, turning left. I stopped at the white line. He did not. His car was half over the line. This blocked my view to the left.
As the lights change, I normally expect one or two cars coming though on amber (As I expect their lights are going from amber to red).
My light was on green, I move slowly forward (reason as stated above).
Then from my left a car cuts infront of me, which is turning right. It was lucky I was moving slowly.

I believe people are taking too many risks, because of stupidly placed lights.

_________________
Oct 11 Birmingham Half Marathon. I am running for the British Heart Foundation.
http://www.justgiving.com/Rob-Taylor


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 20:25 
Offline
User

Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 16:24
Posts: 322
As I have mentioned Southampton is overloaded by inefficient traffic lights, agreed by my friends, parents, taxi and bus drivers.

Today I saw a council worker jump the lights themselves, doing a turn left on red into their Civic Centre and almost hitting the bus I was on.

One rule for us and another for them. I wish the junction had a red light camera; Southampton love them. I want council workers to bear the same frustration as everybody else.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 03:57 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2004 00:14
Posts: 535
Location: Victoria, Australia
I find it very annoying and dangerous where traffic lights are installed at the intersection of a minor road and a major road, probably to give the traffic exiting the small road a chance in heavy traffic. The sequence usually only gives the small road a short space of time and then allocates an extended period to the main road.

All this makes perfect sense - in PEAK hour - but for the rest of the time it is common to have to wait for an extended period of time on the small road at a red light while the main road is completely empty of traffic.

This leads to people entering the intersection too fast on the green as they accellerate rapidly to the lights in case they turn red, and sometimes end up running the red at high speed or people simply ignoring the red.

My suggestion - a system of lights, for these type of roads, that only operate during peak times and maybe have flashing red on the small road and flashing amber on the main road at other times. Traffic facing a flashing red must give way to all traffic on the main road at all times and traffic facing a flashing yellow indicates to proceed with caution but be aware other traffic may be entering the intersection.

In this way the traffic on the minor road is not wasting time sitting at an unnecessary red light.

Just my .02c worth...

_________________
Ross

Yes I'm a hoon, but only on the track!!!!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 15:03 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2004 02:07
Posts: 242
civil engineer wrote:
The problem with pedestrians is that they're like badgers and the like, they will go where they want to go and always have done. When I was building a big urban d/c in south wales they were a complete nuisance! Ignore the bridge, climb over the visi rail and go straight across the roundabout! (I'm probably the same mind).


Then why didn't you make the carriageway go up and down allowing them to cross on a straight path (with no access to the road at all at that point). Yes, I know it would be more expensive to build it that way but how useful it would be. A bit like the A41 underpass that links the Brent Cross Fenwick Car Park to Haley Road near Renters Avenue. Of course, they made the A41 go up to cross the A406, not the pedestrians.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 04, 2006 12:05 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2005 19:50
Posts: 3369
Location: Lost in the Wilderness
In the Daily Telegraph today.

Quote:
Is this the end of the road for traffic lights?
By David Millward
Last Updated: 1:11am GMT 04/11/2006

Most traffic lights should be torn up as they make roads less safe, one of Europe's leading road engineers said yesterday.

Hans Monderman, a traffic planner involved in a Brussels-backed project known as Shared Space, said that taking lights away helped motorists, cyclists and pedestrians to co-exist more happily and safely.

Residents of the northern Dutch town of Drachten have already been used as guinea-pigs in an experiment which has seen nearly all the traffic lights stripped from their streets.

Only three of the 15 sets in the town of 50,000 remain and they will be gone within a couple of years.

The project is the brainchild of Mr Monderman, and the town has seen some remarkable results. There used to be a road death every three years but there have been none since the traffic light removal started seven years ago.

There have been a few small collisions, but these are almost to be encouraged, Mr Monderman explained. "We want small accidents, in order to prevent serious ones in which people get hurt," he said yesterday.

"It works well because it is dangerous, which is exactly what we want. But it shifts the emphasis away from the Government taking the risk, to the driver being responsible for his or her own risk.

"We only want traffic lights where they are useful and I haven't found anywhere where they are useful yet."

Mr Monderman, 61, compared his philosophy of motoring to an ice rink. "Skaters work out things for themselves and it works wonderfully well. I am not an anarchist, but I don't like rules which are ineffective and street furniture tells people how to behave."

In short, if motorists are made more wary about how they drive, they behave more carefully, he said.

The main junction in Drachten handles about 22,000 cars a day. Where once there were traffic lights, there is a roundabout, an extended cycle path and pedestrian area.

In the days of traffic lights, progress across the junction was slow as cars stopped and started. Now tailbacks are almost unheard of — and almost nobody toots a horn.

However, it is not the cars which seem to be involved in the greatest conflict, it is the cyclists and pedestrians who seem to jostle for space. Driving around Drachten, vehicles approach roundabouts with considerable caution – traffic approaches from the left, but cyclists come from either side.

Cyclists, almost none of whom bother with helmets, signal clearly at junctions making sure motorists are aware of them.

Thus far, Drachten's drivers and pedestrians have voted the experiment a success.

"I am used to it now," said Helena Spaanstra, 24. "You drive more slowly and carefully, but somehow you seem to get around town quicker."

Tony Ooostward, 70, was equally enthusiastic. "Everybody is learning. I am a walker and now you are the boss at the crossroads, everyone waits for you. But at the same time pedestrians wait until there are a number wanting to cross at the same time."

Kanaan Jamal, 39, like many people in Drachten, uses a bike to get around. "It is very smooth — a lot better than other towns," he said. The consensus is that the creation of uncertainty by taking away the lights and even in some places the road markings has worked

"Anybody who is new here doesn't know what to do. They don't know who has priority, the car, bike or pedestrian. It's all confusing, but because of that everybody takes care," Mr Jamal said.

_________________
Useless laws weaken necessary laws.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 04, 2006 20:54 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
Since seeing this , noticed some junctions near me have a bit of bias to certain directions. You can arrive at one set in the small hours, with the lights set against any movement ahead. Vehicle approaches from other side , even after about 5 mins, their lights change.

But then a few years ago the road on this set was repaired and since then the length of queues on any side or right turning makes no effect - reason given in press was that "it is possible the sensors were damaged during the repair " - now we see Truvellos getting sensors cut in - so unless it's a more complicated job than that - why not a repair - or is it all about ca$$h.
Congestion makes no difference.
Cameras make money.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 08, 2006 16:49 
Offline
User

Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 19:54
Posts: 55
Location: Shropshire
Is it too much to ask someone from the Highways Agency to come on here and explain to us all what they think they are doing erecting ever more traffic lights?
No one who drives has asked for them, everyone knows they cause tail backs and everyone knows they create driver frustration.
Now unless it is the Highways Agency's objective to create all of this negativity and to create roads that don't flow, would they come and tell us why are they doing it?
Some of us are starting to think it is a preparation to toll charges. The logic being make everyone think the roads are overloaded and congested then the public will be more accepting of road toll charges.
The reallity is the Highways Agency and the councils have caused the chaos they now say tolls will resolve. Well I have news for them, tolls will make no difference at all. There is no alternative to car use in this country outside of the London, so we will all keep driving and paying,
just like Gordon wants and needs.
RJ

_________________
Too much of our money is being wasted on supposed road safety improvements that are actually making driving more dangerous.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 08, 2006 17:01 
Offline
User

Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 19:54
Posts: 55
Location: Shropshire
I grabbed this comment from an earlier postee which sums up how ridiculous it is getting.
RJ

Rat runs have formed in my local area as a result of resignalling the local traffic light junction, making congestion and journey times significantly worse. People now use four alternative routes to avoid the junction, two of which have speed cushions, and three of the roads are predominantly residential and not designed for such through traffic.

I aired my view to the local councillor pleading for alterations to the new layout such as removing the protected right turns and altering timings, but he didn't want to listen, even though rat running is becoming a serious issue. £350,000 on making traffic flow worse... and making everybody's lives worse, apart from the niche flow of pedestrians who use the crossings. Having carried out my own traffic surveys for A-level geography coursework I found this junction to be perfectly adequate, whereas in the High Street there was only one pedestrian crossing with dropped kerbs (woefully inadequate).

_________________
Too much of our money is being wasted on supposed road safety improvements that are actually making driving more dangerous.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 10, 2006 18:42 
Offline
User

Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 16:24
Posts: 322
Rod Evans wrote:
I grabbed this comment from an earlier postee which sums up how ridiculous it is getting.
RJ

Rat runs have formed in my local area as a result of resignalling the local traffic light junction, making congestion and journey times significantly worse. People now use four alternative routes to avoid the junction, two of which have speed cushions, and three of the roads are predominantly residential and not designed for such through traffic.

I aired my view to the local councillor pleading for alterations to the new layout such as removing the protected right turns and altering timings, but he didn't want to listen, even though rat running is becoming a serious issue. £350,000 on making traffic flow worse... and making everybody's lives worse, apart from the niche flow of pedestrians who use the crossings. Having carried out my own traffic surveys for A-level geography coursework I found this junction to be perfectly adequate, whereas in the High Street there was only one pedestrian crossing with dropped kerbs (woefully inadequate).


I'd like to make an update to this. The accident rate at the junction has also increased. In the past three weeks there have been two serious accidents requiring ambulances. The cause of the accidents are people jumping the red lights.

However, the underlying cause is that people rush through the junction on amber because if they have to stop it will cost them between two and five minutes. You see significantly more light jumping. Our former (failed) councillor was an anti-car freak, and 'anti-children involved in motorcycle display teams'. He now wants to stick a speed camera on my road; a road name that he can't even spell. He doesn't even live in the same ward; he lives two or three miles away up the road. Steven Broomfield, piss off back to Fair Oak.

People tend to drive differently through traffic light junctions in my experience; they speed up rather than slow down. Therefore, if speed kills traffic lights kill and should be eradicated as much as possible.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 10, 2006 22:27 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 02:50
Posts: 2868
Location: Dorset
Are these queues all caused by traffic lights?
This is only a quick scan around Southampton, you should see the one I found in Melbourne :|

http://maps.google.co.uk/?ie=UTF8&z=18& ... 6&t=k&om=1
http://maps.google.co.uk/?ie=UTF8&z=18& ... 6&t=k&om=1
http://maps.google.co.uk/?ie=UTF8&z=18& ... 6&t=k&om=1
http://maps.google.co.uk/?ie=UTF8&z=18& ... 6&t=k&om=1

_________________
Andrew.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 68 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.048s | 13 Queries | GZIP : Off ]