Thatsnews wrote:
Quote:
Thatsnew if you really visited Monash you would have noticed there is more then link, where all of them couldn't fit in this forum.
Err... CRW, You have been a bit of a silly Billy, haven't you? A moments thought before you posted the above would have made you realise that of course I must have visited the Monash University site... or else how would I have found the link to the research paper there?
One link
thatsnew, you are being a silly billy when facing the truth aren't you?
Because if you did in fact visited the Monash site and done a search on speed cameras (top right search box), you would soon realise that there is more then one link in fact, there are 10 pages on speed cameras, which I can put up, if I am allowed as the link would go over more then 1 line?
But why are we still waiting for information from you where the source and evidence is not connected to you or safe speed that proves removing speed cameras, lives well be saved as you claim or that it is against The UK Law to name a vehicle on a web site?
Waiting, Waiting, Waiting, Waiting etc etc
PS Thatsnew are you one these people who hears one word and you twist this word around to make it what you wanted to hear or read, which is not the truth?
For example on 9/11 some people said what happened sounded like an explosion, but others twisted these words around and made it into 'it was an explosion'.