Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Tue May 26, 2026 00:51

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 09:03 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2005 23:28
Posts: 1940
Per BBC News - it seem drivers not pull over if feeling yawney. It seem that the government say a fifth of drivers cause the accidents. 18% of 1500 surveyed allegedly pull over if they feel a yawn.

There now a new campaign asking to THINK! if worth continuing to next lay-by if tired already.

_________________
Nicht ganz im Lot!
Ich setze mich immer wieder in die Nesseln! Der Mad Doc ist mein Mann! Und ich benutzte seinen PC!

UND OUR SMILEYS? Smile ... und the the world smiles with you.
Smiley guy seen when you read
Fine me for Safe Speed
(& other good causes..)

Greatest love & Greatest Achievements Require Greatest Risk
But if you lose the driving plan - don't lose the COAST lesson.
Me?
Je ne regrette rien
!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 12:50 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 14:26
Posts: 4364
Location: Hampshire/Wiltshire Border
My immediate reaction is that every so often the Government comes along with "Department of Guesswork" figures that X% of accidents are caused by factor Y.

These soon add up to over 100%.

Still, if you believe them, then tiredness causes 3 times as many accidents as speeding. Sleep cameras?

_________________
Malcolm W.
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not represent the views of Safespeed.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 14:31 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 18:54
Posts: 4036
Location: Cumbria
I'm sure they'd try to squirm out of the "more than 100%" accusation by suggesting that of the 30% of accidents caused by speeding, a signifcant number are actually caused by people speeding while asleep. :roll:


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 17:42 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 02:50
Posts: 2868
Location: Dorset
Remind me, where exactly are we meant to pull over to stop?

_________________
Andrew.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 18:05 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 14:06
Posts: 3654
Location: Oxfordshire
Whilst I have no empirical reason to doubt this figure, I do have to wonder if it comes from the same Department of Proportions which brought us a third which is equal to 5%! :lol:


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 19:15 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 04:10
Posts: 3244
RobinXe wrote:
Whilst I have no empirical reason to doubt this figure, I do have to wonder if it comes from the same Department of Proportions which brought us a third which is equal to 5%! :lol:


Or the same department that decided that the 38% of motorcyclists driving without tax is equal to 6.8%.
They have computer systems with all the info on that they could want, yet they still go by the bean counters on the roadside.
They got cameras everywhere (loads of sneaky little cams on high columns near MK now....) yet they still stick 3 people in a car by the roadside to tick boxes on paper ?
Maybe that's where the near 1 million extra public servants are now.....

_________________
The world runs on oil, period. No other substance can compete when it comes to energy density, flexibility, ease of handling, ease of transportation. If oil didn’t exist we would have to invent it.”

56 years after it was decided it was needed, the Bedford Bypass is nearing completion. The last single carriageway length of it.We have the most photogenic mayor though, always being photographed doing nothing


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 30, 2008 05:17 
Offline
User

Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2005 01:16
Posts: 917
Location: Northern England
I've only experienced this once. Shortly after the opening of the Euro-Tunnel. The Ferries then assumed that everyone wanted a superfast crossing and stopped the Calais - Oostend and Zeebrugge services (bunks available) to a Dover Calais 1 hr ish quick service (no bunks)!

Great if you lived in the SE corner of our country......Downright dangerous if you lived further north.

I remember vaguely driving north on the M40 being woken by an observant lorry drivers horn as I began to slow and wander out of my lane.

I've never used that route since.........but, many lorry drivers do, hence the accidents.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 30, 2008 11:30 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2004 14:47
Posts: 1659
Location: A Dark Desert Highway
at least they are kind of admitting that there is more to crashing than simply exceeding an arbitary number and that there might be other, as yet unknown, forces at work...

If they were honest with us and said all crashes have several contributing factors and no one factor is to blame. They could go on to say that lots of crashes happen when the driver is tired and no able to respond as a more alert driver might and that if we can address this problem by encouraging drivers to not drive when they are tired we might make the roads a little safer for all.

It is no different than with any of the lastest food and or health fads. one day eating food x is great, the next too much x gives you cancer :roll:

If polititions and civil servants would just be straight with us for once....


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 30, 2008 14:57 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 14:26
Posts: 4364
Location: Hampshire/Wiltshire Border
They can't be straightforward with us. This would mean admittting people can use their own judgement about things affecting them instead of having to be controlled by the Government. Control is the ultimate aim of politicians and hence all the new laws passed.

_________________
Malcolm W.
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not represent the views of Safespeed.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 30, 2008 23:05 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 17:12
Posts: 618
Location: Borough of Queens, NYC, NY USA
malcolmw wrote:
They can't be straightforward with us. This would mean admittting people can use their own judgement about things affecting them instead of having to be controlled by the Government. Control is the ultimate aim of politicians and hence all the new laws passed.
Nearly every message they issue is an advertisement. Thus the resemblance to commercials of varying lengths. Every commercial tries to get you to BUY something.

Individual driver behavior, traffic behavior, and road safety are not straightforward issues, but there is a tremendous incentive for the vast majority of people to sum things up in a sound bite.
Those who generate the sound bites are seldom truly qualified or sufficiently knowledgeable about cars, drivers, or roads, but they know that most of the general public has a similar lack of info.
The vast majority of these sound bites sacrifice varying degrees of 'factuality' for catchiness, which the majority of the audience interprets as 'truthiness'.
The sound bites are generated without all the facts in plain sight. Often, they are also generated to obscure the facts.
Therefore the people generating these sound bites are misusing Occam's Razor as a weapon against the unarmed ... to keep a majority of us simple and stupid.

_________________
The Rules for ALL ROAD USERS:
1) No one gets hurt
2) Nothing gets hit, except to protect others; see Rule#1
3) The Laws of Physics are invincible and immutable - so-called 'laws' of men are not
4) You are always immediately and ultimately responsible for your safety first, then proximately responsible for everyone's
Do not let other road users' mistakes become yours, nor yours become others
5) The rest, including laws of the land, is thoughtful observation, prescience, etiquette, decorum, and cooperation


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 31, 2008 00:27 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 16:34
Posts: 4923
Location: Somewhere between a rock and a hard place
Statistics shamistics. I’m sick of them! Am I the only one? :roll:

Did you know 1 in 4 people are Chinese?

There’s four in my family: Tony, Teresa, Vanessa and Kim Wah. I think it’s Vanessa. :roll:

Did you know 5 out of 4 people can't do maths?

(groan) :bunker:


Like I said once here, about a year ago, statistics are like a bikini. What they reveal is interesting but what they conceal is vital. We can talk stats forever; all I want is the truth!

Stats are useful if they take everything into account! But how often does that happen when parties have a vested interest?


(And before a troll comes on with accusations - SS is a 'not for profit' organisation)

_________________
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not necessarily represent the views of Safe Speed.
You will be branded a threat to society by going over a speed limit where it is safe to do so, and suffer the consequences of your actions in a way criminals do not, more so than someone who is a real threat to our society.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 10, 2008 19:24 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2007 17:19
Posts: 31
WildCat wrote:
It seem that the government say a fifth of drivers cause the accidents.


I don't think that's what they said exactly:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/1708872.stm

They say "driver fatigue ... is estimated to be responsible for a fifth of all accidents on motorways and trunk routes".

If there are cameras giving out 3 points and £60 for 10mph above a limit or for using a hand held mobile, are we to see the same for a yawn on camera? Eating a chocolate bar? Rubbing your eyes?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2008 10:21 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 20:28
Posts: 1267
Location: not too far in front, not too far behind.
Ziltro wrote:
Remind me, where exactly are we meant to pull over to stop?


We had a discussion on here a couple of years ago - it was prompted, I think, by the signs on motorway service stations stating that maximum parking length was 2 hours (this is obviously to stop car drivers parking up at services then car sharing to another location? Perhaps the policy should be re-thought now, as car sharing is being promoted more heavily? Anyway, I digress).

I wrote to all of the motorwat service station operators and received replies from a few. I think it was the Roadchef guy who wrote back to say that his parking attendants were instructed never to give a ticket to a car that had a sleeping motorist inside, and the Welcome Break guy who said that his staff were told to use common sense (I had written about 2 things, 1 being that it may be safer to stop for a short nap in the car than carry on with the journey, the second that with 4 very small children, 2 hours to park up, get them out, get them all sat down, fed, numerous toilet trips and ready to go again was easily used up).

I kept the letters for a while, but having moved house and changed car twice, I don't have them anymore. In short, though, if you need a nap, based on my letter writing, choose Roadchef first, then Welcome Break. Moto didn't reply.

_________________
COAST Not just somewhere to keep a beach.

A young loner on a crusade to champion the cause of the innocent, the helpless, the powerless, in a world of criminals who operate above the law.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 21, 2008 09:21 
Offline
User

Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 09:18
Posts: 181
They should have an instant ban on sleeping drivers!

_________________
If you think everyone else around you is driving badly, perhaps it's time to examine your own driving.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 20:28 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 17:12
Posts: 618
Location: Borough of Queens, NYC, NY USA
Pratnership wrote:
They should have an instant ban on sleeping drivers!
Would anyone be opposed to cars that, instead of testing for drunkenness, testing for being awake?

_________________
The Rules for ALL ROAD USERS:
1) No one gets hurt
2) Nothing gets hit, except to protect others; see Rule#1
3) The Laws of Physics are invincible and immutable - so-called 'laws' of men are not
4) You are always immediately and ultimately responsible for your safety first, then proximately responsible for everyone's
Do not let other road users' mistakes become yours, nor yours become others
5) The rest, including laws of the land, is thoughtful observation, prescience, etiquette, decorum, and cooperation


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 20:39 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 04:10
Posts: 3244
Pratnership wrote:
They should have an instant ban on sleeping drivers!


Would that be before, or after they woke them up ?

_________________
The world runs on oil, period. No other substance can compete when it comes to energy density, flexibility, ease of handling, ease of transportation. If oil didn’t exist we would have to invent it.”

56 years after it was decided it was needed, the Bedford Bypass is nearing completion. The last single carriageway length of it.We have the most photogenic mayor though, always being photographed doing nothing


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.049s | 15 Queries | GZIP : Off ]