Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Mon Oct 27, 2025 15:01

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 18:06 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 19:08
Posts: 3434
http://www.detnews.com/article/20091008 ... -debatable

The above link from an american newspaper suggests lowering the speed limits causes more tailgating and aggression. I must admit I notice more "tailgating" now than ever before in my local area (most NSL limits reduced to 40MPH)

_________________
My views do not represent Safespeed but those of a driver who has driven for 39 yrs, in all conditions, at all times of the day & night on every type of road and covered well over a million miles, so knows a bit about what makes for safety on the road,what is really dangerous and needs to be observed when driving and quite frankly, the speedo is way down on my list of things to observe to negotiate Britain's roads safely, but I don't expect some fool who sits behind a desk all day to appreciate that.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 19:04 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 21:10
Posts: 1693
It certainly does if you obey the Stoopid "White Van" speed limits on a SC-NSL!

_________________
"The road to a police state is paved with public safety legislation"


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 21:33 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 21:17
Posts: 3734
Location: Dorset/Somerset border
Tailgating seems to be some people's way of releasing the aggression caused by not being skillful enough to overtake.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 21:51 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 23:07
Posts: 135
Johnnytheboy wrote:
Tailgating seems to be some people's way of releasing the aggression caused by not being skillful enough to overtake.


Or no chance to overtake because with the lower limits there is a higher volume of traffic in the zone?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 22:16 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 19:08
Posts: 3434
Also round our way, where they have dropped the limits to 40MPH they have installed little "crossing refuges" every few hundred yards to prevent overtaking although there is no footpaths on some sides of the road and no need to cross. The council say that these "refuges" are to slow down traffic. The bollards on them seem to get hit frequently....is this really "road safety"????

_________________
My views do not represent Safespeed but those of a driver who has driven for 39 yrs, in all conditions, at all times of the day & night on every type of road and covered well over a million miles, so knows a bit about what makes for safety on the road,what is really dangerous and needs to be observed when driving and quite frankly, the speedo is way down on my list of things to observe to negotiate Britain's roads safely, but I don't expect some fool who sits behind a desk all day to appreciate that.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 22:21 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 21:10
Posts: 1693
Dusty wrote:
It certainly does if you obey the Stoopid "White Van" speed limits on a SC-NSL!


I feel I should point out that I am the "White van"!

_________________
"The road to a police state is paved with public safety legislation"


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 22:50 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 18:54
Posts: 4036
Location: Cumbria
Dusty wrote:
Dusty wrote:
It certainly does if you obey the Stoopid "White Van" speed limits on a SC-NSL!


I feel I should point out that I am the "White van"!


What you need to do is hack the body off it and drop a big garden shed on the back - make sure you get the centre of gravity as high as possible, for maximum instability and minimum braking efficiency! Next, shove a cooker, sink and bed in there - don't skimp, make sure it's pretty much loaded up to its Gross Vehicle Weight. Don't do anything to the brakes, they'll be just fine....

....and now you can do 60 on an NSL single carriageway! :roll:

Good thing we have "experts" to decide these things for us! :wink:


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 22:52 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 18:54
Posts: 4036
Location: Cumbria
Mind Driver wrote:
Johnnytheboy wrote:
Tailgating seems to be some people's way of releasing the aggression caused by not being skillful enough to overtake.


Or no chance to overtake because with the lower limits there is a higher volume of traffic in the zone?


Round here, there is another reason (potentially) which is that long straights where overtaking can be done safely are few and far between. Guess where they park the scamera vans????


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 19, 2009 00:47 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:16
Posts: 7986
Location: Moved to London
graball wrote:
Also round our way, where they have dropped the limits to 40MPH they have installed little "crossing refuges" every few hundred yards to prevent overtaking although there is no footpaths on some sides of the road and no need to cross. The council say that these "refuges" are to slow down traffic. The bollards on them seem to get hit frequently....is this really "road safety"????

As a cyclist, I loath these things. They usually result with me slowing and blocking traffic (which would otherwise have passed freely and without risk) and having vehicles up my a**e - for no good reason.
Granted pedestrians need to cross (not in the case you describe, obviously) but there must be better solutions.

_________________
Views expressed are personal opinions and are not necessarily shared by the Safe Speed campaign


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 19, 2009 14:53 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 23:09
Posts: 6737
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
Where limits are unreasonably low, there can often be a conflict between locals who know they are rarely if ever enforced and treat them with the contempt they deserve, and outsiders who are making some effort to adhere to them because they don't want to get pinged.

_________________
"Show me someone who says that they have never exceeded a speed limit, and I'll show you a liar, or a menace." (Austin Williams - Director, Transport Research Group)

Any views expressed in this post are personal opinions and may not represent the views of Safe Speed


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 02:18 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 02:50
Posts: 2868
Location: Dorset
graball wrote:
Also round our way, where they have dropped the limits to 40MPH they have installed little "crossing refuges" every few hundred yards to prevent overtaking although there is no footpaths on some sides of the road and no need to cross. The council say that these "refuges" are to slow down traffic. The bollards on them seem to get hit frequently....is this really "road safety"????

The obstructions are put there (at out expense) in order to make the road dangerous enough to justify the low speed restriction.

_________________
Andrew.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 08:08 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 19:08
Posts: 3434
Exactly!...

"so in the name of road safety, lets build some dangerous obstructions, place them in the middle of the road and lower the speed limit!!!"

_________________
My views do not represent Safespeed but those of a driver who has driven for 39 yrs, in all conditions, at all times of the day & night on every type of road and covered well over a million miles, so knows a bit about what makes for safety on the road,what is really dangerous and needs to be observed when driving and quite frankly, the speedo is way down on my list of things to observe to negotiate Britain's roads safely, but I don't expect some fool who sits behind a desk all day to appreciate that.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 10:43 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 02:50
Posts: 2868
Location: Dorset
I suspect it is to do with the "targets" they have created for the number of our vehicles they want to get off of our roads. They hate freedom.

_________________
Andrew.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 11:29 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 14:26
Posts: 4364
Location: Hampshire/Wiltshire Border
We now have Boris Johnson saying that he wants the bicycle to be the default mode of transport in London. When I see MPs give up their Government cars I will believe the sincerity of this.

At one time we smiled at the Chinese with all their bikes in Beijing. Then they got richer and decided to buy cars like us. We are going the opposite way to reflect our relative poverty.

I also don't see the logic in trying to reduce car usage while promoting more air transport and runways. This appears schizophrenic.

_________________
Malcolm W.
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not represent the views of Safespeed.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 11:38 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 21:17
Posts: 3734
Location: Dorset/Somerset border
Amid this idea that we should suffer more CO2 cuts than 'developing' nations, effectively we are getting on our bikes so the Chinese can get off theirs.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 13:01 
Offline
User

Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 09:26
Posts: 350
malcolmw wrote:
We now have Boris Johnson saying that he wants the bicycle to be the default mode of transport in London. When I see MPs give up their Government cars I will believe the sincerity of this.


That's going to upset the public tranpsort operators!

malcolmw wrote:
At one time we smiled at the Chinese with all their bikes in Beijing. Then they got richer and decided to buy cars like us. We are going the opposite way to reflect our relative poverty.


True. Hopefully though the Chinese will recognise the full cost of transport sooner than we have and return to their bikes before they get that poor again!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 06, 2009 09:38 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 22:50
Posts: 3267
Peyote wrote:
That's going to upset the public tranpsort operators!


I think that's the point, Boris appears to hate transport where people who don't know each othe have to sit next to each other. He has described buses as "socialistic" which in his world must be close to associating them with child abuse.

He's all for personal transport.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 06, 2009 18:12 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2004 18:42
Posts: 1283
Location: Essex
Quote:
"so in the name of road safety, lets build some dangerous obstructions, place them in the middle of the road and lower the speed limit!!!"


If I were to build or introduce a hazard on a site to control another at best the HSE would close the site down till it was dealt with properly or I could be prosecuted.

_________________
Gordon Brown saying I got the country into it's current economic mess so I'll get us out of it is the same as Bomber Harris nipping over to Dresden and offering to repair a few windows.

Chaos, panic and disorder - my work here is done.

http://www.wildcrafts.co.uk


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 07, 2009 23:50 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 02:17
Posts: 7355
Location: Highlands
When the purpose of local Councils and Transport Management is to 'organise' traffic so that it meets Government targets, they will apply all and every conceivable option open to them in an attempt to meet those targets. This is not about road safety, it is not intelligent or even sensible, and nor is it following research in an unbiased manner, because at this level they are not paid to. We expect proper input all the way through the 'system' but from our point of view this has not happened and has now gone badly wrong. The research is (in many cases) being ignored, misunderstood or twisted that I can see.
I hope that as our efforts continue our message will be listened to and understood, so that one day we can return to having the safest roads in the World.

_________________
Safe Speed for Intelligent Road Safety through proper research, experience & guidance.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 23:35 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
Johnnytheboy wrote:
Amid this idea that we should suffer more CO2 cuts than 'developing' nations, effectively we are getting on our bikes so the Chinese can get off theirs.

:clap: :clap: :clap:

_________________
lets bring sanity back to speed limits.
Drivers are like donkeys -they respond best to a carrot, not a stick .Road safety experts are like Asses - best kept covered up ,or sat on


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 47 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.126s | 10 Queries | GZIP : Off ]