Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Thu Apr 18, 2024 01:06

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2006 22:12 
Offline
New User
New User

Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 20:56
Posts: 8
Location: UK
Hi all,
I've just registered, Great forum!

I had an idea a week or two ago about ways to hit back at speed cameras; it's called the Signal Thumbs Down campaign. Simple idea really, I'm trying to get motorists to signal oncoming traffic with a Thumbs Down signal if there 's a speed trap ahead.

I think we could really hit the profitability of speed cameras if we simply communicate with each other.

I'm going to get a load of bumper stickers printed and give them away or sell them to promote my campaign. I'd love any feedback or thoughts anyone has on this project. The address is http://www.donate-a-mate.com/dam/member.asp?uname=std

_________________
Signal Thumbs Down http://www.donate-a-mate.com/std


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2006 22:18 
Offline
Camera Partnership Staff
Camera Partnership Staff
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2005 19:48
Posts: 1995
excellent idea, pity MCN have done it already

_________________
now retired


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2006 22:38 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
Thumbs_Down wrote:
I had an idea a week or two ago about ways to hit back at speed cameras; it's called the Signal Thumbs Down campaign. Simple idea really, I'm trying to get motorists to signal oncoming traffic with a Thumbs Down signal if there 's a speed trap ahead.


:welcome:

Of course truck drivers have been doing this for years. The signal is already well understood in certain circles.

However, be warned, the legality of this sort of signal is being challenged. A truck driver was aquitted (at crown court I believe) recently and the CPS are appealing. I'm not sure if it's being appealed to the High Court or to the House of Lords.

The two possible charges are 'obstructing a Police Officer in the course of his duty' and 'attempting to pervert the course of justice'.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 00:40 
Offline
New User
New User

Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 20:56
Posts: 8
Location: UK
Interesting who would MCN be?

Yeh I know truck drivers do it but not many car driver do. I didn't know that it could be considered as illegal!

If you have any links or info about the court jugment I would be very interested. (perverting the course of justice, that's ironic :o )

Thanks a lot.

_________________
Signal Thumbs Down http://www.donate-a-mate.com/std


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 00:58 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
Thumbs_Down wrote:
If you have any links or info about the court jugment I would be very interested. (perverting the course of justice, that's ironic


Damn. I was afraid that you would ask me that. I don't have a link to hand, but it was only about a month ago. Anyone?

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 01:31 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2004 13:36
Posts: 1339
Lorry driver cleared of waving

Lords to rule on speeding warning


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 08:21 
Offline
User

Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2006 22:03
Posts: 111
Location: West Sussex
MCN = Motorcycle News

_________________
Nick


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 19:58 
Offline
New User
New User

Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 20:56
Posts: 8
Location: UK
Thanks guys, makes for very interesting reading.

As I understand it then, It's OK to give a thumbs down for gatsos and talivans, but maybe not for police traps (possibility of obstructng an officer) even thuogh this case seems to suggest that the police would have to prove the person was speeding when you warned them.

I liked this comment by the judge:
(Mr Justice Owen suggested that some people might think the police would appreciate "the efforts of others to prevent speeding").

Does anyone have any detaills of the Motorcyle News campaign?

_________________
Signal Thumbs Down http://www.donate-a-mate.com/std


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 20:02 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 16:08
Posts: 54
Quote:
attempting to pervert the course of justice


Who?

The cop sat there waiting on the edge of a 30 zone
or the truckers, for signalling to each other about
the cop being there?

This is hilarious :D Keep it coming!

But you see, I shouldn't be laughing.

I know a guy whose father this happened to,
he was coming up to a 60mph zone from a
30mph zone and ended up with points on his
licence.

Its all smoke and mirrors folks.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 20:21 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9263
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
Thumbs_Down wrote:
Thanks guys, makes for very interesting reading.

As I understand it then, It's OK to give a thumbs down for gatsos and talivans, but maybe not for police traps (possibility of obstructng an officer) even thuogh this case seems to suggest that the police would have to prove the person was speeding when you warned them.

I liked this comment by the judge:
(Mr Justice Owen suggested that some people might think the police would appreciate "the efforts of others to prevent speeding").

Does anyone have any detaills of the Motorcyle News campaign?


Not so far away from the way the AA did things in days of yore - cars carried large badges on grill - AA man saluted members - unless speed trap about -

_________________
lets bring sanity back to speed limits.
Drivers are like donkeys -they respond best to a carrot, not a stick .Road safety experts are like Asses - best kept covered up ,or sat on


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2006 09:46 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 23:17
Posts: 499
I find this whole court case quite bizare.

Surely, notifying another driver of a speed trap is merely making the trap more visible to other road users.

The SCPs all spout the same old rubbish; "all we want to do is slow people down, not to catch people".

In my opinion, making a hand gesture or flashing headlights slows other drivers down, exactly what police and SCPs want; so how can the police possibly complain?

I find it amazing that this even came to trial.

I find it equally amazing that some jobsworth was actually lying in wait trying to spot motorist's hand gestures. For god's sake, our council tax goes to these people!

What is the police force coming to?!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2006 13:01 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2004 13:36
Posts: 1339
What I don't get either is how do they tell why you are waving? Maybe he didn't know about the camera and was just telling someone to slow down because they were actually going too fast! Or maybe he was just waving to a mate? :thumbsdown:*


* Disclaimer: This smilie indicates disapproval of some of the events being discussed and is not in any way intended to warn others of a safety camera being operated nearby, whether hidden or otherwise.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2006 14:01 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 23:17
Posts: 499
Zamzara wrote:
What I don't get either is how do they tell why you are waving? Maybe he didn't know about the camera and was just telling someone to slow down because they were actually going too fast! Or maybe he was just waving to a mate? :thumbsdown:*


* Disclaimer: This smilie indicates disapproval of some of the events being discussed and is not in any way intended to warn others of a safety camera being operated nearby, whether hidden or otherwise.


Exactly...........unless the communication was in approved british Sign Language, ie an unambiguous message, and the police could demonstrate the receipient of the message understood it, i don't think the police even have a point to make. I hope they feel very embarassed with themselves.

Also, if the police wish to conduct covert enforcement surely it is their responsiblity to take reasonable measures to make the enforcement covert.

It is my humble opinion that a police officer standing by the roadside holding aming a laser gun at passing vehicles, in clear view of other road users, is by definition not covert.

How does notifying any other road user of the proesence of enforcement, that is clearly visible, in any way an obstruction of the police.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2006 14:44 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2005 19:50
Posts: 3369
Location: Lost in the Wilderness
T2006 wrote:
How does notifying any other road user of the proesence of enforcement, that is clearly visible, in any way an obstruction of the police.


Because they will not make any money, and could loose their jobs. :)

_________________
Useless laws weaken necessary laws.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2006 19:17 
Offline
Camera Partnership Staff
Camera Partnership Staff
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2005 19:48
Posts: 1995
Dixie wrote:
T2006 wrote:
How does notifying any other road user of the proesence of enforcement, that is clearly visible, in any way an obstruction of the police.


Because they will not make any money, and could loose their jobs. :)


i should set up a countdown clock to April 2007, when the rules of netting off go out the window and the SCP become grant funded,

_________________
now retired


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2006 19:57 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 23:17
Posts: 499
camera operator wrote:
Dixie wrote:
T2006 wrote:
How does notifying any other road user of the proesence of enforcement, that is clearly visible, in any way an obstruction of the police.


Because they will not make any money, and could loose their jobs. :)


i should set up a countdown clock to April 2007, when the rules of netting off go out the window and the SCP become grant funded,


Does this mean tax payers money will be used instead of speed camera revenue?

If so i'm not sure which is the most controversial; tax payers money funding a pseudoscience, unproven road safety measure, or a biased SCP with a vested interest in putting revenue generation before road safety.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 11, 2006 10:34 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 08:49
Posts: 400
I am so stupid that when someone flashed me the other day I assumed they knew me and while I was trying to figure out who it was I drove through a speed trap. :stupidme:

_________________
Shooting is good for you and too good for some people.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 12, 2006 01:38 
Offline
Suspended
Suspended

Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 14:31
Posts: 97
LeveL wrote:
Quote:
attempting to pervert the course of justice


Who?

The cop sat there waiting on the edge of a 30 zone
or the truckers, for signalling to each other about
the cop being there?

This is hilarious :D Keep it coming!

But you see, I shouldn't be laughing.

I know a guy whose father this happened to,
he was coming up to a 60mph zone from a
30mph zone and ended up with points on his
licence.

Its all smoke and mirrors folks.


Am I missing something here? Presumably he was speeding in the 30 zone?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 12, 2006 01:40 
Offline
Suspended
Suspended

Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 14:31
Posts: 97
Dixie wrote:
T2006 wrote:
How does notifying any other road user of the proesence of enforcement, that is clearly visible, in any way an obstruction of the police.


Because they will not make any money, and could loose their jobs. :)


Simple, change the current fine system to only a points on your licence system. Fair enough?

I thought not...

How about, we just let all the speeders carry on breaking the law, and the rest of us can watch as our loved ones are butchered by selfish speeders who couldn't give two hoots about anybody else.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 12, 2006 01:44 
Offline
Suspended
Suspended

Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 14:31
Posts: 97
I've got a brilliant idea to 'hit back' at speed cameras:

Don't speed!

Brilliant! I wish I'd thought of this before.

Can anybody explain to me just WHY you find it necessary to speed? Please?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.033s | 13 Queries | GZIP : Off ]